Skip to main content

Autonomy, Dignity, Beneficence, and Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Ethics ((BRIEFSETHIC))

Abstract

Much of our concern in the field of applied ethics has to do with the central principles of modern medical ethics. As it turns out, the ethos of science also demands that we abide by these same principles. At the outset of this book, I described the emergence of modern applied ethics, its origins in philosophical ethical theory, and the development of post-Nuremberg principles, codes, and institutions. Now we will explore a bit more in depth the nature of these major ethical principles as applied to human subject research. Norms that have been largely developed after World War II demand that human subjects be treated according to certain, basic ethical principles, including: autonomy, dignity, beneficence, and justice. In this chapter I discuss these principles briefly, and provide an argument for their adherence to and emergence from norms of scientific behavior generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allmark, Peter. 1995. Can there be an ethics of care? Journal of Medical Ethics 21(1): 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andorno, Roberto. 2009. Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34(3): 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, Richard E. 2005. Making sense of dignity. Journal of Medical Ethics 31(11): 679–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benatar, Soloman R. 2001. Justice and medical research: A global perspective. Bioethics 15(4): 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H. Tristram. 1996. The foundations of bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Charles. 2013. Human dignity in bioethics and law. Journal of Medical Ethics: medethics-2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, Maurice. 2004. Embodied care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and feminist ethics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, John. 1999. Justice and equal opportunities in health care. Bioethics 13(5): 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häyry, Matti, and Tuija Takala. 2005. Human dignity, bioethics and human rights. Developing World Bioethics 5(3): 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczor, Christopher. 2006. The edge of life: Human dignity and contemporary bioethics, vol. 85. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, Nancy E. 2004. Public health ethics from foundations and frameworks to justice and global public health. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32(2): 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koepsell, David. 2010. On genies and bottles: Scientists’ moral responsibility and dangerous technology R&D. Science and Engineering Ethics 16(1): 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewy, Erich H. 1989. Beneficence in Trust. Hastings Center Report 19(1): 42–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, Ruth. 2003. Dignity is a useless concept: It means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy. BMJ: British Medical Journal 327(7429): 1419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millum, Joseph, and Ezekiel J. Emanuel. 2012. Global justice and bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’neill, Onora. 2002. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rancich, Ana María, et al. 2005. Beneficence, justice, and lifelong learning expressed in medical oaths. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 25(3): 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, Stuart, and Bavon Mupenda. 2008. Living apart together: Reflections on bioethics, global inequality and social justice. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3(1): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secker, Barbara. 1999. The appearance of Kant’s deontology in contemporary Kantianism: Concepts of patient autonomy in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24(1): 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvers, Anita, David T. Wasserman, and Mary Briody Mahowald. 1998. Disability, difference, discrimination: Perspectives on justice in bioethics and public policy, vol. 94. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, James Stacey. 2010. Practical autonomy and bioethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, Paul Root. 1998. The triumph of autonomy in American bioethics: A sociological view. Bioethics and Society: Constructing the Ethical Enterprise: 38–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koepsell, D. (2017). Autonomy, Dignity, Beneficence, and Justice. In: Scientific Integrity and Research Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51277-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics