Skip to main content

Is There a State-of-the-Art to Reduce Pile-Driving Noise?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Underwater noise caused by pile-driving during the installation of offshore foundations is potentially harmful to marine life. In Germany, the regulation authority BSH set the following protection values: Sound Exposure Level SEL = 160 dB and Peak Level LPeak = 190 dB for Harbor Porpoises that must be complied with at a distance of 750 m to the construction site in order to avoid temporal threshold shifts. The experience over the last years shows that underwater sound produced during pile-driving, depending on many parameters and measurements, shows values of up to 180 dBSEL and up to 205 dBL Peak in a distance of 750 m. Therefore, Noise Mitigation Systems (NMS) are required to significantly minimize the underwater sound. Since 2011, NMS must be applied during all noisy offshore construction work in Germany. The Institute of Technical and Applied Physics GmbH (itap) was involved in many offshore wind farm (OWF) projects with pile-driving activities (>1000 pile installations without and with different NMS). Based on these underwater noise measurements, the tested NMS were evaluated. In this paper, a general overview of existing and tested NMS including tested system variations is provided and the measured data and influencing factors on the resulting noise reduction are discussed. Additionally, combinations of two or more NMS are measured during the construction phase, if monopiles with diameters of up to 8 m are installed. It is demonstrated what level of effect one or more NMS have on the emitted noise. However, it is shown that it is possible to install monopiles with a diameter of >6 m with noise levels below 160 dBSEL at a distance of 750 m, if combinations of suitable NMS are used. Nevertheless, any kind of noise mitigation will have a significant influence on the ‘disturbed’ or treated area from pile-driving noise for marine mammals. The question of whether a state-of-the-art measure to reduce pile-driving noise exists will be explored, based on measured data and experiences with NMS under real offshore conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    SEL5: 95% percentile value of the SEL, which means 95% of all blows per installation have lower SEL values. The SEL5 must be compared with the German limiting value 160 dB @750 m distance. Differences between SEL50 and SEL05 are usually 2–3 dB (empirical data).

References

  • Bellmann M (2014) Overview of existing noise mitigation systems for reducing pile-driving noise. Proceeding auf der Internoise 2014, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • BSH (2011) Offshore wind farms — measuring instruction for underwater noise measurement, technical report by Müller & Zerbst on behalf of BSH. Available via http://www.bsh.de/

  • BSH (2013a) Standard — investigation of the impacts of offshore wind turbines on marine environment (StUK4). Available via http://www.bsh.de/

  • BSH (2013b) Offshore wind farms — measuring specification for the quantitative determination of the effectiveness of noise control systems. Report M100004/05 by Müller & Zerbst on behalf of BSH. Available via http://www.bsh.de/

  • Diederichs A, Pehlke H, Nehls G, Bellmann MA, Gerke P, Oldeland J, Grunau C, Witte S (2014) Entwicklung und Erprobung des „Großen Blasenschleiers“ zur Minderung der Hydroschallemissionen bei Offshore-Rammarbeiten (HYDROSCHALL OFF BW II), technical final report, funded by BMWi and PTJ 0325309 A/B/C. Available via http://www.hydroschall.de

  • Gündert S (2014) Empirische Prognosemodelle für Hydroschallimmissionen zum Schutz des Gehörs und der Gesundheit von Meeressäugern. Masterarbeit an der Universität Oldenburg, Institut für Physik, AG Akustik

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastelain RA, Gransier R, Hoek L, Rambags M (2013) Hearing frequency thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) temporarily affected by a continuous 1.5 kHz tone. J Acoust Soc Am 134/3:2286. doi:10.1121/1.4816405. ISSN 00014966

  • Koschinski S, Lüdemann K (2013) Stand der Entwicklung schallminimierender Maßnahmen beim Bau von Offshore‐Windenergieanlagen. Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Available via https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/themen/meeresundkuestenschutz/downloads/Berichte-und-Positionspapiere/Entwicklung-schallmindernder-Massnahmen-beim-Bau-von-Offshore-Windenergieanlagen-2013.pdf

  • Nehls G, Bellmann MA (2015) Weiterentwicklung und Erprobung des „Großen Blasenschleiers“ zur Minderung der Hydroschallemissionen bei Offshore-Rammarbeiten, technical final report, funded by BMWi and PTJ, FKZ 0325645A/B/C/D. Available via www.hydroschall.de

  • Schorcht S (2015) Technical noise mitigation during offshore-windfarm foundation examples from offshore windfarms: Meerwind Süd|Ost, Global Tech I, Nordsee Ost, DanTysk, EnBW Baltic 2, Borkum Riffgrund 1, Amrumbank West und Butendiek. Presented at the offshore wind R&D conference 2015 in Bremerhaven, 13/14 Oct 2015. Available via http://www.rave-conference.de/

  • Thiele & Schellstede (1980) Standardwerte zur Ausbreitungsdämpfung in der Nordsee. FWG-Bericht 1980-7, Forschungsanstalt der Bundeswehr für Wasserschall und Geophysik

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke F, Kloske K, Bellmann M (2012) Evaluation von Systemen zur Rammschallminderung an einem Offshore-Testpfahl, technical final report for the project ESRa, funded by BMWi and PTJ FKZ 0325307

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to all companies involved in the performed offshore tests within several funded research projects and normal construction phases, and especially to all OWF owners, who allowed us to conduct a lot of underwater noise measurements within their construction processes.

Great thanks go to all manufacturers of noise mitigation systems for their courage to develop and build different concepts to reduce pile-driving noise. Additionally, thank you very much for the constructive discussion during the improving and enhancing processes onshore and offshore; we enjoyed the experience.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Bellmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bellmann, M.A., Schuckenbrock, J., Gündert, S., Müller, M., Holst, H., Remmers, P. (2017). Is There a State-of-the-Art to Reduce Pile-Driving Noise?. In: Köppel, J. (eds) Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51272-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics