Skip to main content

Topology and Psychoanalysis: Rhe-torically Restructuring the Subject

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Topologies as Techniques for a Post-Critical Rhetoric
  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

Although a topological account of the psychoanalytic subject had been of interest to Jacques Lacan since the early 1950s, it was not until the late 1970s that Lacan fully embraced knot theory. Following the genealogy of this topological turn, this chapter suggests that Lacan’s development of topology is simultaneously a pivot toward a psychoanalytic praxis of rhetoric. Lacanian knot theory enables rhetorician and analyst alike to articulate the various situations and discourses the subject is caught up within without diminishing their multiplicity. Thus, clinical and pedagogical topology opens up novel means of rhetorical invention. If in his turn toward topology Lacan suggests new ways of writing the subject, then this chapter shows how the intersection of topology and psychoanalysis creates a (rhe)torical praxis that remains open to the Other in its discordant diversity.

Every knot says a lot

—James Joyce

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Beckett, Samuel. 1991. Three Novels: Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Virginia, and Anna Secor. 2011. “Psychotopologies: Closing the Circuit Between Psychic and Material Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29: 1030–1047. doi:10.1068/d11910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charraud, Nathalie. 2001. “Topology: The Möbius Strip between Torus and Cross-Cap.” In A Compendium of Lacanian Terms, ed. Huguette Glowinski, Zita M. Marks, and Sara Murphy, Trans. Oliver Feltham and Dominique Hecq, 204–210. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, Lorenzo. 2006. “Count-As-One, Forming-Into-One, Unary Trait, S1.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 2, nos. 1–2: 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Tim. 2013. Geographic Thought: A Critical Introduction. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Diane. 2010. Inessential Solidarity: Rhetoric and Foreigner Relations, Pitt Comp Literacy Culture. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa, Edson Luiz André. 2013. “An Ocean That Is Disarmed into Letters: Utopia and Psychoanalysis.” In The Epistemology of Utopia: Rhetoric, Theory and Imagination, ed. Jorge Bastos da Silva, 158–164. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, Suzanne. 2014. “Lacan with Beckett.” Nottingham French Studies 53, no. 1: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidelsztein, Alfredo. 2009. The Graph of Desire: Using the Work of Jacques Lacan. Trans. Florencia F.C. Shanahan. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1989. The Ego and the Id. Trans. Joan Riviere. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. A. A Brill. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N.A., and C.H. Séquin. 2007. “Keizo Ushio’s Sculptures, Split Tori and Möbius Bands.” Journal of Mathematics and Art 1, no. 1: 47–57. doi:10.1080/17513470701217217.

  • Gunn, Joshua. 2004. “Refitting Fantasy: Psychoanalysis, Subjectivity, and Talking to the Dead.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 90, no. 1: 1–23. doi:10.1080/0033563042000206808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harari, Roberto. 2002. How James Joyce Made His Name: A Reading of the Final Lacan. Trans. Luke Thurston. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 1987. “Television.” Trans. Denis Hollier, Rosalind Krauss, and Annette Michelson. October 40: 6–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991a. Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953–1954. Trans. John Forrester. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, bk 1. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991b. The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954–1955 (Vol. Book II), ed. Jacques-Alain Miller and Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan 2. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Alan Sheridan. Reiss. The Seminar of Jaques Lacan, Book 11. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. On Feminine Sexuality: The Limits of Love and Knowledge. Trans. Bruce Fink. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, bk. 20. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. “L’étourdit.” Trans. Cormac Gallagher. The Letter 41: 31–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. n.d. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XXIII: Joyce and the Sinthome, 1975–1976. Trans. Cormac Gallagher. unpublished, lacaninireland.com.

  • Laplanche, Jean, and Jean-Bertrand Pontalis. 2006. The Language of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, Eric. 2007. “The Purloined Letter and the Tao of the Psychoanalyst.” In The Later Lacan: An Introduction, ed. Véronique Voruz and Bogdan Wolf, 25–52. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Stokes, Carmela. 2001. “Jouissance.” In A Compendium of Lacanian Terms, ed. Huguette Glowinski, Zita M. Marks, and Sara Murphy, 101–109. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, Christian. 2004. “The Royal Road Not Taken: Joshua Gunn’s ‘Refitting Fantasy: Psychoanalysis, Subjectivity and Talking to the Dead’ and Lacan’s Symbolic Order.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 90, no. 4: 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Lacan in Public: Psychoanalysis and the Science of Rhetoric, Rhetoric, Culture, and Social Critique. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, Marcelle. 1992. Jacques Lacan: The French Context. Trans. Anne Tomiche. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Jacques-Alain. 1994. “Extimité.” In Lacanian Theory of Discourse: Subject, Structure, and Society, ed. Mark Bracher, Marshall W. Alcorn, Ronald J. Corthell, and Françoise Massardier-Kenney, 74–87. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. “Commentary on the Graphs.” In Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, ed. Jacques Lacan, and Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobus, Dany. 2001. “Littorical Reading: Lacan, Derrida, and the Analytic Production of Chaff.” Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society 6, no. 2: 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. “Lacan’s Science of the Subject: Between Linguistics and Toplogy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Lacan, ed. Jean-Michel Rabaté, 50–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, Diane. 2007. “Mapping the Unconscious: Freud’s ‘Topographic’ Constructions.” Visual Resources 23, nos. 1–2: 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pile, Steve. 2014. “Beastly Minds: A Topological Twist in the Rethinking of the Human in Nonhuman Geographies Using Two of Freud’s Case Studies, Emmy von N. and the Wolfman.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39: 224–236. doi:10.1111/tran.12017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, Graciela. 2011. “Writing the Subject’s Knot.” Transl. Kristina Valendinova. Recherches En Psychanalyse 12(December): 170–179. doi:10.3917/rep.012.0170.

  • Rickert, Thomas J. 2007. Acts of Enjoyment: Rhetoric, Žižek, and the Return of the Subject, Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler, Colette. 2003. “The Paradoxes of the Symptom in Psychoanalysis.” In The Cambridge Companion to Lacan, ed. Jean-Michel Rabaté, 86–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Lacanian Affects: The Function of Affect in Lacan’s Work. Trans. Bruce Fink. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomšič, Samo. 2012. “Homology: Marx and Lacan.” S: Journal of the Jan van Eyck Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique 5: 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitanza, Victor J. 1997. Negation, Subjectivity, and the History of Rhetoric. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Tzahi. 2009. “On the Matter of Language: The Creation of the World from Letters and Jacques Lacan’s Perception of Letters as Real.” Journal of Jewish Thought & Philosophy 17, no. 1: 101–115. doi:10.1163/147728509X448993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cowan, J. (2017). Topology and Psychoanalysis: Rhe-torically Restructuring the Subject. In: Walsh, L., Boyle, C. (eds) Topologies as Techniques for a Post-Critical Rhetoric. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51267-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51268-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics