Abstract
Topological criticism gains dynamism when it attends to texts’ chronologies. The topos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric gains clarity when read within the context of Aristotle’s spatial metaphor of reasoning as cognitive motion. Further, the dynamics of probabilistic topoi over time can be more clearly understood when conjoined with a focus on tekmēria, signs held to be necessary in the negative spaces of self-evidence and impossibility. The quasi-dialogue between Isocrates’ Against the Sophists and Alcidamas’ About the Writers of Written Speeches, a debate about the relative temporal characteristics of written and oral discourse, offers warrants for the claims that topological criticism can be dynamic. Read together, these texts reveal the workings of time-in-texts and texts-in-time at the fulcrum between orality and literacy in ancient Greek thought.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Alcidamas: The Works and Fragments, ed. and Trans. J. V. Muir. London: Bristol Classical Press (Duckworth), 2001.
Aristotle. 2006. The “Art” of Rhetoric, ed. and Trans. John Henry Freese. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Cassin, Barbara. 2014. “Topos/Kairos: Two Modes of Invention.” In Sophistical Practice: Toward a Consistent Relativism, 87–101. New York: Fordham University Press.
Di Piazza, Salvatore, and Francesca Piazza. 2016. “The Words of Conjecture: Semiotics and Epistemology in Ancient Medicine and Rhetoric.” Rhetorica 34, no. 1: 1–26.
Eberly, Rosa A., and Jeremy David Johnson. 2017. “Isocratean Tropos and Mediated Multiplicity.” In Ancient Rhetorics + Digital Networks, ed. Michele Kennerly and Damien Pfister. University of Alabama Press.
Gagarin, Michael, and Paul Woodruff, ed. 1995. Early Greek Political Thought from Homer to the Sophists. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grimaldi, W.M.A. 1980. “Semeion, Tekmerion, Eikos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” The American Journal of Philology 4: 383–398.
Harari, Orna. 2012. “Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proofs.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 366–375.
Isocrates, Against the Sophists, Greek text from Isocrates vol. II, ed. and Trans. George Norlin. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Kraus, Manfred. 2011. “How to Classify Means of Persuasion: The Rhetoric to Alexander and Aristotle on Pisteis.” Rhetorica 29: 263–279.
Lentz, Tony. 1989. Orality and Literacy in Hellenic Greece. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2015. “Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 48: 26–53.
Noël, Marie-Pierre. 2011. “Isocrates and the Rhetoric to Alexander: Meaning and Uses of Tekmerion.” Rhetorica 29: 319–335.
Reguero, M. Carmen Encinas. 2009. “La evolución de algunos conceptos retóricos. Semeion y tekmerion del s. V al IV a.C.” Rhetorica 27: 373–403.
Reinhardt, Tobias. 2007. “Techniques of Proof in 4th Century Rhetoric: Ar. Rhet. 2.23-24 and Pre-Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory.” Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric, ed. David C. Mirhady.
Rickert, Thomas. 2013. Ambient Rhetoric: Attunements of Rhetorical Being. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Schiappa, Edward. 1990, Winter. “Did Plato Coin Rhētorikē?” The American Journal of Philology 111, no. 4: 457–470. http://www.jstor.org/stable/295241
Van Hook, LaRue. 1919. “Alcidamas Versus Isocrates; The Spoken Versus the Written Word.” The Classical Weekly 12: 89–94. www.jstor.org/stable/4387752
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cody, A.W., Eberly, R.A. (2017). Topoi and Tekmēria: Rhetorical Fluidity among Aristotle, Isocrates, and Alcidamas. In: Walsh, L., Boyle, C. (eds) Topologies as Techniques for a Post-Critical Rhetoric. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51267-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51268-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)