A Federation of Clutter: The Bourgeoning Language of Vulnerability in Australian Policing Policies

  • Loene M HowesEmail author
  • Isabelle Bartkowiak-Théron
  • Nicole L Asquith


The policing of vulnerable people has long been a topic of operational uncertainty and political sensitivity. On the one hand, governments have accepted that police officers require special mechanisms to cater for disadvantaged social groups and should interact with members of these groups in such a way that vulnerability attributes are acknowledged (Bartkowiak-Théron and Asquith 2012a). On the other hand, agencies disagree on a variety of technical issues relating to the policing of vulnerable people, such as collaborative logistics, leadership, ownership and resource sharing. The policing of vulnerability has been under close scrutiny for over 30 years, with an increasing array of government and non-government services contributing their own areas of expertise to assist in solving these ‘wicked’ issues (Fleming and Wood 2006: 2). Yet, the burgeoning lists of who constitutes a vulnerable person, and the haphazard and localised development of strategies, have left little room for policy and practice transfer across vulnerability attributes, let alone jurisdictions. In this chapter, we reverse the policy transfer lens from the UK and US to consider the valuable policy and practice innovations developed in one Australian jurisdiction that may resolve some of the operational barriers to policing vulnerability in other jurisdictions.


Police Officer Torres Strait Islander Umbrella Term Vulnerable People Australian Capital Territory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Charter of Victims Rights [Victims Rights and Support Act] 2013, (NSW).Google Scholar
  2. Child Protection Act 1999, (Qld).Google Scholar
  3. Law Enforcement [Powers and Responsibilities] Act 2002, (NSW).Google Scholar
  4. Law Enforcement [Powers and Responsibilities] Regulation 2005, (NSW).Google Scholar
  5. Mental Health Act 2000, (Qld).Google Scholar
  6. Working with Vulnerable people [Background Checking] Act 2011, (ACT).Google Scholar
  7. Archdiocese of Brisbane 2015, Safeguarding children and vulnerable adults: Prevention and protection. Brisbane, Australia: Archdiocese of Brisbane. Available from (accessed 11 June 2015).Google Scholar
  8. Asquith, N. L., & Bartkowiak-Théron, I. 2012, Vulnerability and diversity in policing, in I. Bartkowiak-Theron & N. L. Asquith (eds), Policing vulnerability. Sydney: The Federation Press, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  9. Asquith, N. L., Bartkowiak-Théron, I., & Roberts, K. 2016, Vulnerability and the criminal justice system, Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 2(3), pp. 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Australian Capital Territory Government 2015, A guide to working with vulnerable people in the ACT. Canberra: ACT Government. Available from (accessed 28 June 2015).Google Scholar
  11. Australian Network on Disability 2015, Inclusive Language. Available from (accessed 1 July 2015).
  12. Bartkowiak-Théron, I. 2011, Policing partnerships for police organisations, in P. Birch & V. Herrington (eds), Policing in practice. London: Palgrave, pp. 180–204.Google Scholar
  13. Bartkowiak-Théron, I., & Asquith, N. L. 2012, The extraordinary intricacies of policing vulnerability, Australasian Policing: A Journal of Professional Practice and Research, 4(2), pp. 43–49.Google Scholar
  14. Bartkowiak-Théron, I., & Asquith, N. L. 2015, Policing diversity and vulnerability in the post-Macpherson era: Unintended consequences and missed opportunities, Policing: A Journal of Policy & Practice, 9(1), pp. 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bartkowiak-Théron, I., & Asquith, N. L. 2016, Practice synergies and conceptual divides in law enforcement and public health: Some lessons from policing vulnerability in Australia, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. doi:  10.1080/10439463.2016.1216553.Google Scholar
  16. Bartkowiak-Théron, I., & Corbo Crehan, A. 2012, ‘For when equality is given to unequals, the result is inequality’: The socio-legal ethics of vulnerable people, in I. Bartkowiak-Theron & N. L. Asquith (eds), Policing vulnerability. Sydney: Federation Press, pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
  17. Bartkowiak-Theron, I., & Lieutier, F. 2014, Making community engagement a core business of policing, in I. Bartkowiak-Théron & K. Anderson (eds), Knowledge in action: University-community engagement in Australia. London: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 116–131.Google Scholar
  18. Berg, B. L. 2009, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7e). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  19. Boxelaar, L., Paine, M., & Beilin, R. 2006, Community engagement and public administration: Of silos, overlays and technologies of government, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(1), pp. 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brackertz, N. 2007, Who is hard to reach and why? Australian Policy Online. Available from (accessed 4 September 2015).
  21. Brown, K. 2014, Questioning the vulnerability zeitgeist: Care and control practices with ‘vulnerable’ young people, Social Policy and Society, 13, pp. 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Critchlow, R. 2015, Critical issues in the field. Paper Presented at Policing Vulnerability: Challenges and Solutions Symposium, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, 9–10 December, 2015.Google Scholar
  23. Dunn, M. C., Clare, I. C. H., & Holland, A. J. 2008, To empower or to protect? Constructing the ‘vulnerable adult’ in English law and public policy, Legal Studies, 28(2), pp. 234–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleming, J., & Wood, J. 2006, New ways of doing business: Networks of policing & security, in J. Fleming & J. Wood (eds), Fighting crime together: The challenges of policing and security networks. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  25. Fyson, R., & Kitson, D. 2010, Human rights and social wrongs: Issues in safeguarding adults with learning disabilities, Practice: Social Work in Action, 22(5), pp. 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilson, E. 2014, The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Hamilton, M. 2010, People with complex needs and the criminal justice system, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22(2), pp. 307–324.Google Scholar
  28. Herring, C., & Henderson, I. 2011, From affirmative action to diversity: Toward a critical diversity perspective, Critical Sociology, 38(5), pp. 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, T., & Newburn, T. 2001, Widening access: Improving police relations with hard to reach groups. London: Home Office, Police Research Series.Google Scholar
  30. Mason-Bish, H. 2010, Future challenges of hate crime policy: Lessons from the past, in N. Chakraborti (ed), Hate crime: Concepts, policy, future directions. Collumpton: Willan Publishing, pp. 58–77.Google Scholar
  31. Merriam-Webster. (2015). Vulnerability. Available from (accessed 26 June 2015).
  32. Millie, A. 2014, The great debate: How wide or narrow should the police’s remit be?, Public Safety Leadership: Research Focus, 2(4), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  33. New South Wales Police Force 2012, Victims policy statement. Sydney: NSWPF.Google Scholar
  34. O’Callaghan, K. 2014 (5 May), Police reform to create better future, What Really Matters: WA Police Commissioner’s Blog. Available from (accessed 19 June 2015).
  35. Ogloff, J. R. P., Thomas, S. D. M., Luebbers, S., Baksheev, G., Elliott, I., Godfredson, J., Kesic, D. et al. 2013, Policing services with mentally ill people: Developing greater understanding and best practice, Australian Psychologist, 48(1), pp. 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Purple Orange 2011, Submission by purple orange: Safeguarding vulnerable adults in services operated or funded by the department of families and communities in South Australia. Unley, SA: Julia Farr Association.Google Scholar
  37. Queensland Crime and Misconduct Commission (QCMC) 2013, Vulnerable victims: Child homicide by parents, Research and Issues, 10. Brisbane: CMC.Google Scholar
  38. Queensland Government 2015a, Public Safety Business Agency. Available from (accessed 20 June 2015).
  39. Queensland Government 2015b, The Blue Card System. Available from (accessed 20 June 2015).
  40. Queensland Police Service (QPS) 2010, Vulnerable Persons Policy. Available from (accessed 11 June 2015).
  41. Queensland Police Service (QPS) 2014, Operating Procedures Manual. Available from (accessed 11 June 2015).
  42. Queensland Police Service (QPS) 2015a, Children, Commissioner’s Circular No. 2/2015; File No. DOC14/1371945.19/01/2015. Available from (accessed 11 June 2015).
  43. Queensland Police Service (QPS) 2015b, Child harm, Commissioner’s Circular No. 3/2015; File No. DOC14/1371956.19/01/2015. Available from (accessed 11 June 2015).
  44. Reiner, R. 2000, The politics of the police (4e). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Robinson, K., Bansel, P., Denson, N., Ovenden, G., & Davies, C. 2014, Growing up queer: Issues facing young Australians who are gender variant and sexuality diverse. Melbourne: Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. 1968, Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt Rinehart Winston.Google Scholar
  47. Roulstone, A., Thomas, P., & Balderston, S. 2011, Between hate and vulnerability: Unpacking the British criminal justice system’s construction of disablist hate crime, Disability and Society, 26(3), pp. 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shearlock, L., & Cambridge, P. 2009, Working effectively with the police in safeguarding vulnerable adults: Sharing the experience from Somerset, Policy and Practice, 11(4), pp. 6–19.Google Scholar
  49. Sproule, W. 2010, Content analysis, in M. Walter (ed), Social research methods(2e). Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 320–350.Google Scholar
  50. Stanford, S. 2012, Critically reflecting on being ‘at risk’ and ‘a risk’ in vulnerable people policing, in I. Bartkowiak-Theron & N. L. Asquith (eds), Policing vulnerability. Sydney: Federation Press, pp. 20–32.Google Scholar
  51. Stevens, E. 2013, Safeguarding vulnerable adults: Exploring the challenges to best practice across multi-agency settings, The Journal of Adult Protection, 15(2), pp. 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tasmanian Department of Education 2011, Guidelines for inclusive language. Hobart: Department of Education. Available from (accessed 11 June 2015).Google Scholar
  53. Tasmanian Department of Health and Human Services 2010, A working with children and other vulnerable people checking system for Tasmania. Hobart: DHHS.Google Scholar
  54. Thorneycroft, R. M., & Asquith, N. L. 2015, The dark figure of disablist violence, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 54(5), pp. 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. UK Department of Health 2000, No secrets: Guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse. London: The Stationary Office. Available from (accessed 28 June 2015).Google Scholar
  56. United Kingdom Department of Health 2009, Safeguarding Adults. Report on the consultation on the review of no secrets: Guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  57. Western Australian Mental Health Commission 2010, People with exceptionally complex needs. Perth: Western Australian Government. Available from (accessed 26 June 2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loene M Howes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isabelle Bartkowiak-Théron
    • 2
  • Nicole L Asquith
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Social SciencesUniversity of TasmaniaTasmaniaAustralia
  2. 2.Tasmanian Institute of Law Enforcement StudiesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  3. 3.Western Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations