Some Implications of the Moral Vulnerability of Police

  • Anna Corbo CrehanEmail author


The situational sources of vulnerability to which police are subject when on duty have been well documented. However, the moral vulnerability of police has received less attention, and this is a significant oversight given that increasing a person’s vulnerability puts them at increased risk of harm and so is prima facie wrong (in the absence of any very good reasons to the contrary). In this chapter, two important senses of moral vulnerability are clarified and applied to two contemporary issues in policing: the defensiveness of police when called to account for their actions or inactions, and their use of tasers. This perspective on the issues allows for some important ethical insights to be identified. In addition, the discussion demonstrates that moral vulnerability is a susceptibility to very real harms and, therefore, where such vulnerability exists, it ought to impact on our ethical assessments.


Police Officer Police Action Moral Community Moral Condemnation Police Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arnetz, B. B., Nevedal, D. C., Lumley, M. A., Backman, L., & Lublin, A. 2009, Trauma resilience training for police: Psychophysiological and performance effects, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 24(1), pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashcroft, R. 2003, Consent, inducement and conflict of interest in medical research and development, in J. Boomgaarden, P. Louhiala, & U. Wiesing (eds), Issues in medical research ethics. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
  3. Bronitt, S. 2012, Rethinking police use of force: Linking law reform with policy and practice, Criminal Law Journal, 36(2), pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
  4. Caless, B., & Tong, S. 2015, Leading policing in Europe: An empirical study of strategic police leadership. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chae, M. H., & Boyle, D. J. 2013, Police suicide: Prevalence, risk, and protective factors, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 36(1), pp. 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbo Crehan, A., & Absalom, M. 2016, Watching out for the watchers, Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice. doi:  10.1108/JCRPP-08-2015-0038.Google Scholar
  7. Goldsworthy, T. 2014 (25 November), Shoot to kill: The use of lethal force by police in Australia, the conversation. Available from (accessed 2 September 2016).
  8. Goldsworthy, T. 2016 (10 June), NSW police defend ‘life or death’ shooting, the project. Available from (accessed 2 September 2016).
  9. Gove, T. G. 2011, Implicit bias and law enforcement, The Police Chief, 78 (October), pp. 44–56.Google Scholar
  10. Karlsson, I., & Christianson, S. 2003, The phenomenology of traumatic experiences in police work, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 26(3), pp. 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kleinig, J. 2007, Ethical constraints on Taser use by police, Policing, 1(3), pp. 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marenin, O. 2016, Cheapening death: Danger, police street culture, and the use of deadly force, Police Quarterly. doi:  10.1177/1098611116652983.Google Scholar
  13. Ménard, K. S., & Arter, M. L. 2014, Stress, coping, alcohol use, and posttraumatic stress disorder among an international sample of police officers: Does gender matter?, Police Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, S., Blackler, J., & Alexandra, A. 2006, Police ethics (2e). Crow’s Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. New South Wales Ombudsman 2012, How are Taser Weapons Used by the NSW Police Force? Available from (accessed 2 September 2016).
  16. Punch, M. 2011, Shoot to kill—police accountability, firearms and fatal force. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shane, J. M. 2010, Organizational stressors and police performance, Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), pp. 807–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stinchcomb, J. B. 2004, Searching for stress in all the wrong places: Combating chronic organizational stressors in policing, Police Practice and Research, 5(3), pp. 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thornton, S. 2016 (13 May), Accept blame, then learn from it: This should be a police credo, The Guardian. Available from (accessed 2 September 2016).
  20. Tucker, J. M. 2015, Police officer willingness to use stress intervention services: The role of perceived organizational support (POS), confidentiality and stigma, International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 17(1), pp. 304–314.Google Scholar
  21. Tuckey, M. R., Winwood, P. C., & Dollard, M. F. 2012, Psychosocial culture and pathways to psychological injury within policing, Police Practice and Research, 13(3), pp. 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vuorensyrjä, M., & Mälkiä, M. 2011, Nonlinearity of the effects of police stressors on police officer burnout, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 34(3), pp. 382–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Walker, M. U. 2007, Moral understandings—A feminist study in ethics (2e). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, M. U. 2014, Moral vulnerability and the task of reparations, in C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers, & S. Dodds (eds), Vulnerability—new essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 110–133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Graduate School of Policing and SecurityCharles Sturt UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations