Advertisement

The Effect of Tensile Strength on the Formability Parameters of Dual Phase Steels

  • Gábor Béres
  • Miklós Tisza
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The importance of dual phase (DP) steels in the automotive industry was continuously spreading in the last decade. With their special microstructure—containing ferrite and martensite in particular ratio—high strength and increased formability is available. That’s the reason why the application of DP steels is providing to exceed the 50% in a modern car body structure, according to the European program of Ultra-Light Steel Auto Body Advanced Vehicle Technology. This paper presents the experimental results of hemispherical dome tests and uniaxial tensile tests of three types of DP steels: DP 600, DP 800 and DP 1000. The effect of the tensile strength on the formability was investigated. It was described by the total and the ultimate tensile elongation, the average anisotropy and the limiting dome height (LDH). Based on our results it can be concluded that both the total and the uniform elongations are nearly linearly decreasing as the tensile strength is increasing. The slope of total elongation is more sensitive to the strength growth. However, it is no longer true for the plastic anisotropy. The reduction rate of average anisotropy stops over 800 MPa, and does not change until 1100 MPa. According to the dome tests results, the formability is also influenced by the sample geometry—through the deformation path—besides the tensile strength. The LDH values in biaxial stretch strain conditions are less dependent on the tensile strength. They are within a 3 mm interval for all three strength classes. In plane or stretch-press strain conditions, higher reduction can be observed. The characteristics of dome height curves are similar for all samples, regardless of their strength.

Keywords

Tensile Strength Dual Phase Steel Dual Phase Uniform Elongation Blank Holder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The presented research work was supported by Ministry of Human Resources, in the program of National Talent Program NFTÖ-16—scholarships to provide individual development.

References

  1. 1.
    Li Y, Lin Z, Jiang A, Chen G (2003) Use of high strength steel sheet for lightweight and crashworthy car body. Mater Des 24:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cui X, Zhang H, Wang S, Zhang L, Ko J (2011) Design of lightweight multi-material automotive bodies using new material performance indices of thin-walled beams for the material selection with crashworthiness consideration. Mater Des 32:815–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuziak R, Kawalla R, Waengler S (2008) Advanced high strength steels for automotive industry. Arch Civil Mech Eng VIII:103–117Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uthaisangsuk V, Prahl U, Bleck W (2011) Modelling of damage and failure in multiphase high strength DP and TRIP steels. Eng Fract Mech 78:469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Surajit Kumar Paul (2013) Real microstructure based micromechanical model to simulate microstructural level deformation behavior and failure initiation in DP 590 steel. Mater Des 44:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun X, Choi KS, Soulami A, Liu WN, Khaleel MA (2009) On key factors influencing ductile fractures of dual phase (DP) steels. Mater Sci Eng, A 526:140–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Movahed P, Kolahgar S, Marashi SPH, Pouranvari M, Parvin N (2009) The effect of intercritical heat treatment temperature on the tensile properties and work hardening behavior of ferrite–martensite dual phase steel sheets. Mater Sci Eng, A 518:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Official certificate of material testing laboratory of SSAB EMEA AB, Borlange, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tisza M, Kovács PZ, Lukács Zs (2015) Formability of high strength sheet metals with special regard to the effect of the influential factors on the forming limit diagrams. Mater Sci Forum 812:271–275. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.812.271
  10. 10.
    Danyi J, Végvári F, Béres G (2016) Járműipari célú acéllemezek mélyíthetőségi és mélyhúzhatósági problémái. Miskolci Egyetem Közleményei: Anyagmérnöki Tudományok 39(1):19–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Technology, Faculty of GAMF Technical and ITUniversity of Pallasz AthénéKecskemétHungary
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and ITUniversity of MiskolcMiskolcHungary

Personalised recommendations