Skip to main content

Sparse Representation Methods for Image Prediction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 596 Accesses

Abstract

An alternative class of image prediction methods based on sparse representation is discussed in this chapter. Typical sparse representation techniques aim to approximate the unknown block as a linear combination of few patches extracted from an adaptive dictionary, that is formed by texture patches derived from the previously encoded area. Due to their features, sparse representation methods tend to perform better in the presence of complex textures with repeated patterns. The sparse characteristic imposes a reduced number of linearly combined patches, providing a representative model that performs more efficiently for prediction purposes.

In this chapter, dimensionality reduction methods are investigated in the context of the most recent HEVC standard, in particular for Light Field image coding. Experiments demonstrate the advantage of the LLE-based prediction to exploit the high redundant structure of Light Field images.

An improved sparse linear prediction method that can be seen as a generalisation of existing linear prediction and sparse representation prediction methods is also presented. Unlike most LSP-based algorithms proposed in literature, which use a fixed filter context limited to a small set of closer neighbouring pixels, sparse-LSP involves a linear prediction method able to use a sparse filter context defined in larger causal area. Sparsity restrictions are imposed to the linear prediction method by limiting the number of non-null coefficients in the filter context, using the k-nearest neighbours method. Experimental tests for natural image coding demonstrate the advantage of the developed method relative to other existing prediction solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. (2016) http://www.tgeorgiev.net/Gallery. Accessed 5 Jan 2016

  2. Agooun A, Fatah OA, Fernandez JC, Conti C, Nunes P, Soares LD (2013) Acquisition, processing and coding of 3d holoscopic content for immersive video systems. 3DTV-conference: the true vision-capture, transmission and display of 3D video (3DTV-CON) (2013), pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bjontegaard G (2001) Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves. ITU-T SG 16 Q6 video coding experts group (VCEG), Document VCEG-M33

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bossen F (2013) Common HM test conditions and software reference configurations. Joint collaborative team on video coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Document JCTVC-L1100. 12th Meeting, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conti C, Nunes P, Soares L (2012) New HEVC prediction modes for 3D holoscopic video coding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing, ICIP ’12, Orlando, FL, pp 1325–1328

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conti C, Soares LD, Nunes P (2016) HEVC-based 3d holoscopic video coding using self-similarity compensated prediction. Signal Process Image Commun 42:59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graziosi DB, Rodrigues N, da Silva E, de Faria S, de Carvalho M (2009) Improving multiscale recurrent pattern image coding with least-squares prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing, ICIP ’09, Cairo, pp 2813–2816

    Google Scholar 

  8. HM Reference Software for HEVC (2013). https://hevc.hhi.fraunhofer.de/svn/svn_HEVCSoftware/tags/. Accessed 5 Jan 2016

  9. Lucas L, Conti C, Nunes P, Ducla Soares L, Rodrigues N, Pagliari C, da Silva E, de Faria S (2014) Locally linear embedding-based prediction for 3d holoscopic image coding using HEVC. In: Proceedings of the European signal processing conference, EUSIPCO ’14, Lisbon, pp 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lucas L, Rodrigues N, Pagliari C, da Silva E, de Faria S (2015) Sparse least-squares prediction for intra image coding. In: 22th IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), 2015, pp 1115–1119. doi:10.1109/ICIP.2015.7350973

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turkan M, Guillemot C (2010) Image prediction: Template matching vs. sparse approximation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing, ICIP ’10, Hong Kong, pp 789–792

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turkan M, Guillemot C (2012) Image prediction based on neighbor-embedding methods. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(4):1885–1898

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosário Lucas, L.F., Barros da Silva, E.A., Maciel de Faria, S.M., Morais Rodrigues, N.M., Liberal Pagliari, C. (2017). Sparse Representation Methods for Image Prediction. In: Efficient Predictive Algorithms for Image Compression. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51180-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51180-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51179-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51180-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics