Advertisement

Faculty Reflections at the Intersection of Digital Storytelling and Community Engagement

  • Bev Bickel
  • Bill Shewbridge
  • Romy Hübler
  • Ana Oskoz
Chapter
  • 901 Downloads
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

Drawing on a decade of extensive digital storytelling at University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), experienced faculty practitioners have expanded story work beyond traditional personal narratives into community engagement and public scholarship projects. While social and civic aspirations have been present in the work of Joe Lambert and the Center for Digital Storytelling (now the Story Center) since its early days, there is increasing interest in digital stories, conceived broadly, and their intersection with renewed campus commitments in US higher education’s democratic purposes and the continued development of civically engaged, public scholarship. UMBC’s faculty reflections on recent projects at the intersection of digital storytelling and civic engagement provoke our discussion of collaborative, inclusive knowledge production, disseminating stories and nurturing public scholarship, and the contributions of this engaged story work to changing campus cultures. We conclude with recommendations from experienced practitioners for launching and sustaining community-engaged story work across disciplines and communities.

Keywords

Faculty Member Civic Engagement Community Partner Social Entrepreneurship Epistemic Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2004). Cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. BaltimoreHeritage. (2016). Explore Baltimore Heritage. http://explore.baltimoreheritage.org/ (home page). Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  4. BaltimoreTraces. (2016a). Baltimore Traces. http://baltimoretraces.org (home page). Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  5. BaltimoreTraces. (2016b). Mapping dialogues. Baltimore Traces. http://baltimoretraces.org/mapping-dialogues. Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  6. BaltimoreTraces. (2016c). Stories of deindustrialized Baltimore on the Marc Steiner show. Baltimore Traces. http://baltimoretraces.umbc.edu/projects/stories-of-deindustrialization-on-the-marc-steiner-show/. Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  7. BaltimoreUprising. (2016). Preserve the Baltimore uprising 2015 archive project. http://baltimoreuprising2015.org (home page). Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  8. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  9. Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Couldry, N. (2008). Digital storytelling, media research and democracy: Conceptual choices and alternative futures. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 41–60). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, A., & Foley, L. (2016). Digital storytelling. In B. Guzzetti & M. Lesley (Eds.), Handbook of research on the societal impact of digital media (pp. 317–342). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference [IGI Global].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1916/1997). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. DigitalStories@UMBC. (2016). Digital Stories @ UMBC, http://stories.umbc.edu (home page). Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  14. Drotner, K. (2008). Boundaries and bridges: Digital storytelling in education studies and media studies. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 61–81). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  15. Eatman, T. K., & O’Meara, K. A. (2015). Advancing engaged scholarship in promotion and tenure: A roadmap and call for reform. Liberal Education, 101(3), n. p. http://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/2015/summer/o%27meara. Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  16. Ellison, J., & Eatman, T. K. (2008). Scholarship in public: Knowledge creation and tenure policy in the engaged university. Syracuse: Imagining America.Google Scholar
  17. Erstad, O., & Silseth, K. (2008). Agency in digital storytelling: Challenging the educational context. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 213–232). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Erstad, O., & Wertsch, J. (2008). Tales of mediation: Narrative and digital media as cultural tools. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 21–40). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, R., Fabricant, M., & Simmons, L. (2004). Understanding contemporary university-community connections: Context, practice, and challenges. In T. M. Soska & A. K. Johnson Butterfield (Eds.), University-community partnerships: Universities in civic engagement (pp. 13–34). Binghamton: Haworth Social Work Practice Press.Google Scholar
  20. Freire, P. (2003). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ganz, M. (2010). Leading change: Leadership, organization, and social movements. In N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), Handbook of leadership theory and practice: An HBS centennial colloquium on advancing leadership (pp. 509–550). Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gubrium, A., & Harper, K. (2013). Participatory visual and digital methods. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hartley, M., & Harkavy, I. (2011). The civic engagement movement and the democratization of the academy. In C. Gibson & N. Longo (Eds.), From command to community: A new approach to leadership education in colleges and universities (pp. 67–82). Medford: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hrabowski, F. A., & Maton, K. I. (2009). Change institutional culture, and you change who goes into science. Academe, 95(3), 11–15.Google Scholar
  27. Hull, G. A., & Katz, M.-L. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.Google Scholar
  28. Jay, G. (2011). The engaged humanities: Principles and practices for public scholarship and teaching. Journal of community engagement and scholarship, 3(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
  29. Kezar, A. (2014). Higher education change and social networks: A review of research. Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kezar, A., Gallant, T., & Lester, J. (2011). Everyday people making a difference on college campuses: The tempered grassroots leadership tactics of faculty and staff. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, T. (2008). The truth about stories: A narrative. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  32. King, P. N. (2014). Preserving places, making spaces in Baltimore: Seeing the connections of research, teaching, and service as justice. Journal of Urban History, 40(3), 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). Dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American Children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Lambert, J. (2013). Seven stages: Story and the human experience. Berkeley: Digital Diner Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2008). Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Mander, H. (2010). Words from the heart: Researching people’s stories. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2(2), 252–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MappingBaybrook. (2016). Mapping Baybrook. http://mappingbaybrook.org (home page). Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  38. Meyerson, D. E. (2003). Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  39. Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6(5), 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MillStories. (2016). Mill Stories. http://millstories.org (home page). Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  41. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore, T., & Ward, K. (2010). Institutionalizing faculty engagement through research, teaching, and service at research universities. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Fall, 2010, 44–58.Google Scholar
  43. New England Resource Center for Higher Education. (n.d.). Lynton Award for the scholarship of engagement for early career faculty. http://www.nerche.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=375:ernest-a-lynton-award-for-early-career-faculty&catid=25&Itemid=68. Accessed 27 Oct 2016.
  44. Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nussbaum, M. C. (1998). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. O’Meara, K. A. (2011). Faculty civic engagement: New training, assumptions, and markets needed for the engaged American scholar. In J. A. Saltmarsh & M. Hartley (Eds.), “To serve a larger purpose”: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education (pp. 177–197). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  47. O’Meara, K. A. (2013). Advancing graduate student agency. Higher Education in Review, 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
  48. O’Meara, K. A., & Stromquist, N. P. (2015). Faculty peer networks: Role and relevance in advancing agency and gender equity. Gender & Education, 27(3), 338–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Post, M., Ward, E., Longo, N., & Saltmarsh, J. (2016). Publicly engaged scholars: Next-generation engagement and the future of higher education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Rice, E. R. (2003). Rethinking scholarship and engagement: The struggle for new meanings. Campus Compact Reader, Fall, 2003, 1–9.Google Scholar
  51. Saltmarsh, J., Hartley, M., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Democratic engagement white paper. Boston: New England Resource Center for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  52. Sanchez, G. J. (2004). The tangled web of diversity and democracy. Foreseeable Futures #4, Imagining America, Artists and Scholars in Public Life, pp. 4–24. http://imaginingamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Foreseeable-Futures-4-Sanchez.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  53. Sturm, S., Eatman, T., Saltmarsh, J., & Bush, A. (2011). Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and community engagement in higher education, Imagining America. Paper 17. http://surface.syr.edu/ia/17. Accessed 11 Sept 2016.
  54. Velez-Ibanez, C. G. (1988). Networks of exchange among Mexicans in the U.S. and Mexico: Local level mediating responses to national and international transformations. Urban Anthropology, 17(1), 27–51.Google Scholar
  55. von Wright, M. (2002). Narrative imagination and taking the perspective of others. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4/5), 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Weedon, C. (2004). Identity and culture: Narratives of difference and belonging. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Whitchurch, C. (2013). Reconstructing identities in higher education: The rise of “third space” professionals. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bev Bickel
    • 1
  • Bill Shewbridge
    • 1
  • Romy Hübler
    • 1
  • Ana Oskoz
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations