Implicating Practice: Engaged Scholarship Through Co-creative Media

  • Darcy Alexandra
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)


This chapter centres co-creative scriptwriting and the intellectual and aesthetic labour of two research practitioners as a means to explore digital storytelling as a form of engaged scholarship. It draws from research with asylum seekers and refugees in Ireland that advanced a longitudinal (four years) and inquiry-based approach to digital storytelling. Research findings indicate that this approach to digital storytelling facilitated dynamic opportunities for engaged inquiry into the asylum regime, recognition of storytellers and stories, and sustained encounters of narrative exchange. In particular, co-creative scriptwriting served as a vehicle for learning from and about research subjects in more equitable ways. In contrast to the rules of storytelling enforced in asylum proceedings, the monologues created by research practitioners are more akin to poetic meditations than to legal testimony or political confession. Of equal importance for consideration is the narrative time of the stories–in terms of the time it took to think through and compose them, and the lifespan and relationships these stories reveal. The reflexive use of digital storytelling raises questions related to the inherent complexities of participatory knowledge production through media practice. These issues are discussed coupled with theoretical considerations from visual and cultural anthropology.


Asylum Seeker Research Practitioner Refugee Status Direct Provision Digital Storytelling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alexandra, D. (2015). Visualizing migrant voices: Co-creative documentary and the politics of listening. Ph.D. Dublin Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  2. Cammarota, J. (2008). The cultural organizing of youth ethnographers: Formalizing a praxis-based pedagogy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 39(1), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coll, K. M. (2010). Remaking citizenship: Latina immigrants and new American politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. El Haj, T. R. A. (2009). Becoming citizens in an era of globalization and transnational migration: Re-imagining citizenship as critical practice. Theory into Practice, 48(4), 274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feldman, G. (2012). Border control: The new meaning of containment. In The migration apparatus: Security, labor and policymaking in the European Union (pp. 78–117). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fine, M., Weis, L., Centrie, C., & Roberts, R. (2000). Educating beyond the borders of schooling. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 31(2), 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fletcher, C., & Cambre, C. (2009). Digital storytelling and implicated scholarship in the classroom. Journal of Canadian Studies, 43(1), 109–130.Google Scholar
  8. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of hope. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Gubrium, A. (2009). Digital storytelling as a method for engaged scholarship in anthropology. Practicing Anthropology, 31(4), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, M. (2013). The wherewithal of life: Ethics, migration, and the question of well-being. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambert, J. (2013). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community (4th ed.). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loyal, S. (2011). The direct provision regime. In Understanding immigration in Ireland: State, capital and labor in a global age (pp. 101–121). Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Moll, L. C. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(1), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nuñez-Janes, M. (2016). When ethnography relates: Reflections on the possibilities of digital storytelling. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 47(3), 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosaldo, R. (1994). Cultural citizenship in San Jose, California. PoLAR, 17(2), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smyth, J., & Mangan, S., (2010, December 17). Asylum seekers return after deportation plane breaks down. The Irish Times. Accessed 30 Sept 2016.
  19. Spurgeon, C. L., Burgess, J. E., Klaebe, H. G., Tacchi, J. A., McWilliam, K., & Tsai, M. (2009, July 8–10). Co-creative media: Theorising digital storytelling as a platform for researching and developing participatory culture. In Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane. Accessed 30 Sept 2016.
  20. Stoller, P. (1997). Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darcy Alexandra
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations