Advertisement

The Scholarship of Integration and Digital Storytelling as “Bildung” in Higher Education

  • Yngve Nordkvelle
  • Yvonne Fritze
  • Geir Haugsbakk
Chapter
  • 917 Downloads
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

A Scholarship of Integration helps learners and teachers make sense of higher education. The separation of higher education from people’s lifeworlds has historical roots. Knowledge production accelerates and makes it increasingly difficult for students to get an oversight, develop ethical norms and judgements and feel in control of their situation. Teachers need tools and methods to engage students and support their understanding and preparedness to change what they find troublesome, unfair and daring. Digital Storytelling (DS) is a method for promoting student’s integration of knowledge, and this chapter discusses it in the light of educational philosophy. It asks what possibilities DS has for setting a larger agenda, as a didactic cornerstone—for “Bildung”—or signature pedagogy for higher education.

Keywords

High Education Boot Camp Signature Pedagogy Pedagogical Relationship Digital Storytelling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersson, L., & Kinnear, D. (2014). They just don’t get it: Digital storytelling as reflection with junior doctors. In P. Hardy & T. Sumner (Eds.), Cultivating compassion. How digital storytelling is transforming healthcare (pp. 109–120). Chichester: Kingsham Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ballatt, J., & Campling, P. (2011). Intelligent kindness. Reforming the culture of healthcare. London: RCPsych Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, R., Parry, G., & Coate, K. (2001). Conceptualising curriculum change. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjørndal, B., & Lieberg, S. (1978). Nye veier i didaktikken? Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
  7. Bok, D. C. (2003). Universities in the marketplace. The commercialization of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boud, D., & Knights, S. (1996). Course design for reflective practice. In N. Gould & I. Taylor (Eds.), Reflective learning for social work (pp. 23–34). Aldershot: Arena Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Copland, S., & Miskelly, C. (2010). Making time for storytelling; The challenges of community building and activism in a rural locale. Seminar.net International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 6(2), 192–207.Google Scholar
  12. Egan, K. (1989). Teaching as storytelling. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Friesen, N. (2012). Experiential evidence: I, we, you. In N. Friesen, C. Henriksson, & T. Saevi (Eds.), Hermeneutic phenomenology in education (pp. 9–54). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fritze, Y., & Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2015). Digitalt innfødte eller bare medialiserte? In Y. Fritze, G. Haugsbakk, & Y. T. Nordkvelle (Eds.), Mediepedagogiske perspektiver: mediesosialisering, undervisning om og med medier (pp. 67–83). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.Google Scholar
  15. Fritze, Y., Haugsbakk, G. O., & Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2016). Visual Bildung between iconoclasm and idolatry. Nordicom Review, 37(2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gurung, R. A. R., Chick, N. L., & Haynie, A. (2009). Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (1st ed.). Sterling: Stylus Pub.Google Scholar
  17. Handal, G. (1984). Hva er fagdidaktikk. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 68(2), 59–63.Google Scholar
  18. Hjarvard, S. (2009). Samfundets medialisering: En teori om mediernes forandring af samfund og kultur. NORDICOM—Information, 31(1–2), 5–35.Google Scholar
  19. Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(2), 148–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jamissen, G., & Skou, G. (2010). Poetic reflection through Digital Storytelling—A methodology to foster professional health worker identity in students. Seminar.net, 6(2), 177–191.Google Scholar
  21. Kaare, B. H., & Lundby, K. (2008). Mediated lives: Autobiography and assumed authenticity in digital storytelling. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 105–122). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Kress, G., & Leuwen, T. V. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Hodder.Google Scholar
  23. Lam, C. M., Wong, H., & Leung, T. T. F. (2007). An unfinished reflective journey: Social work students’ reflection on their placement experiences. British Journal of Social Work, 37(2), 91–105.Google Scholar
  24. Løvlie, L. (2009). Dannelse og profesjon. In: Dannelsesutvalget for høyere utdanning. Kunnskap og dannelse foran et nytt århundre (pp. 28–38). University of Bergen website. http://www.uib.no/filearchive/innstilling-dannelsesutvalget.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2016.
  25. Manen, M. V. (1994). Pedagogy, virtue and narrative identity in teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 4(2), 135–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marton, F., Dall’alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277–300.Google Scholar
  27. McClean, S. T. (2007). Digital storytelling. The narrative power of visual effects in film. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2003). Didactics: From classical rhetoric to kitchen-Latin. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11(3), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pettersen, R. C. (2005). Kvalitetslæring i høgere utdanning. Innføring i problem- og praksisbasert didaktikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  31. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Richardson, B. (2000). Recent concepts of narrative and the narratives of narrative theory. Style, 34, 168–175.Google Scholar
  33. Sampson, J., & Cohen, R. (2001). Strategies for peer learning. Some examples. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education (pp. 35–49). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  34. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. doi: 10.2307/20027998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Solberg, M. (2010). Om akademisk danning med utgangspunkt i Kants sensus communis og ‘Hva er opplysning?’. In F. Nilsen & L. Dybdal (Eds.), Festskrift til Hjördis Nerheim i anledning 70-årsdagen (pp. 51–68). Oslo: Unipub Forlag.Google Scholar
  36. Solberg, M., & Hansen, F. T. (2015). On Academic Bildung in higher education. A Scandinavian approach. In T. Fossland, H. Mathiasen, & M. Solberg (Eds.), Routledge research in higher education: Academic Bildung in net-based higher education: Moving beyond learning (pp. 28–54). Florence: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yngve Nordkvelle
    • 1
  • Yvonne Fritze
    • 1
  • Geir Haugsbakk
    • 1
  1. 1.Inland Norway University of Applied SciencesLillehammerNorway

Personalised recommendations