Skip to main content

The Quest for an Emancipatory Peace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping Peace in Kosovo

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 648 Accesses

Abstract

This concluding chapter offers a reappraisal and charts the necessary conditions for a more emancipatory form of peace to emerge in Kosovo. The proposed agenda for an emancipatory peace is situated in a delicate balance between the necessity for joint commitments to the state of Kosovo, dealing with the past through an emancipatory reconciliation process, and the promotion of people-centred security. The book concludes by asserting that grounds for emancipation in Kosovo are more likely to take place through self-emancipation and individual actions than organised and collective politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Interview by author with a youth activist in Kosovo, Pristina, 28 April 2016.

  2. 2.

    Assembly of Kosovo, Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo. 15 June 2008. Available at: http://www.kuvendikosoves.org/common/docs/Constitution1%20of%20the%20Republic%20of%20Kosovo.pdf (accessed 18 July 2016).

  3. 3.

    For an overview of UN Development Programme in Kosovo, see http://www.ks.undp.org/content/kosovo/en/home/ourwork/overview/ (accessed 07 September 2016).

References

  • Alker HR (1996) Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International (2009) Burying the Past: 10 Years of Impunity for Enforced Disappearances and Abductions in Kosovo. London: Amnesty International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B (2014) Encountering Affect: Capacities, Apparatuses, and Conditions. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assembly of Kosovo (2015) Law No.05/L-053 on Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office, 03 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou A (2005) Metapolitics. Trans. J Barker. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargetz B (2015) The Distribution of Emotions: Affective Politics of Emancipation. Hypatia 30(3): 580–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkan E (2000) The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan E and Karn A (2006) Group Apology as an Ethical Imperative. In E Barkan and A Karn (eds), Taking Wrongs Seriously: Apologies and Reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta G (2010) The New Logic of Emancipation: The Methodology of Jacques Rancière. Educational Theory 60(1): 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham C and Biesta G (2010) Jacques Ranicère: Education, Truth, Emancipation. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth K (1991) Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies 17(4): 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell T and Till C (2010) Resistance Towards Ethics. In M Davis and K Tester (eds), Bauman’s Challenge: Sociological Issues for the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 172–188.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JN (2014) International Trials and Reconciliation: Assessing the Impact of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRDP (2012) Victims of Conflict in Kosovo: Time to Stop and Listen. Pristina: Centre for Research, Documentation and Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRDP (2013) Struggle on All Fronts: For Kosovo’s Institutions, Judiciary, and Media Dealing with the Past is a Perplexing Issue. Pristina: Centre for Research, Documentation and Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRDP (2014) The Road to Justice: Missing Persons in Kosovo from a Policy Standpoint. Pristina: Centre for Research, Documentation and Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRDP (2016) The Right to Reparation in Kosovo. Pristina: Centre for Research, Documentation and Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar A (2008) Territories of Difference: Place, Movement, Life, Redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans C (2012) The Right to Reparation in International Law for Victims of Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi L (2006) Affective Communities: Anticolonial Thought, Fin-de-Siècle Radicalism, and the Politics of Friendship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M (2006) A Theory of Political Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett N (2007) Badiou, Balibar, Rancière: Re-thinking Emancipation. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • HLC (2011) Transitional Justice in Post-Yugoslav Countries: Report for 2010–2011. Belgrade: Humanitarian Law Center. Available at http://www.hlc-rdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Transitional-Justice-in-Post-Yugoslav-countries-Report-for-2010-2011.pdf (accessed 26 June 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • HLC (2015a) Manual on Transitional Justice: Concepts, Mechanisms and Challenges. Pristina: Humanitarian Law Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • HLC (2015b) Transitional Justice in Serbia in the period from 2013 to 2015. Belgrade: Humanitarian Law Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger DA (1995) Postethnic America: Beyond Multiculturalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humanitarian Law Center (2016) Transitional Justice in Serbia in the period from 2013 to 2015. Belgrade: Humanitarian Law Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth A (1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison E (2016) Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions after Trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ICRC (2002) Unknown Fate, Untold Grief. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross. Available at https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/sr_balkans_missing.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insight B (2013) Yugoslav Army General Admits Kosovo War Crimes, 28 January. Available at http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/yugoslav-army-general-admits-kosovo-crimes/1458/74 (accessed 27 June 2016).

  • Isin E and Nielsen GM (eds) (2008) Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey A (2013) The Improvised State: Sovereignty, Performance and Agency in Dayton Bosnia. The Atrium: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg L and Dayton BW (2012) Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Resolution (4th ed.). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubo H (2010) Operationalising Human Security: A Brief Review of the United Nations. In McIntosh M and Hunter A (eds) New Perspectives on Human Security. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited, pp. 31–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lederach JP (1997) Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach JP and Appleby RS (2010) Strategic Peacebuilding: An Overview. In Philpott D and Powers GF (eds) Strategies of Peace: Transforming Conflict in a Violent World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martiniello M (2001) Towards a Post-ethnic Europe. Patterns of Prejudice 35(1): 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May T (2008) The Political Thought of Jacques Ranciére: Creating Equality. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Migdal JS (2004) State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T (1991) The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics. The American Political Science Review 85(1): 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman E (2011) A Human Security Peace-Building Agenda. Third World Quarterly 32(10): 1737–1756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes J (2014) Security, Emancipation and the Politics of Health: A New Theoretical Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendaal A (2013) A Crucial Link: Local Peace Committees and National Peacebuilding. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özerdem A and Podder S (2015) Youth in Conflict and Peacebuilding: Mobilization, Reintegration and Reconciliation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patomäki H (2002) After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)construction of World Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse JN (1992) Emancipations, Modern and Postmodern. Development and Change 23(3): 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh M (2010) Welfare in War-Torn Societies: Nemesis of the Liberal Peace. In Richmond OP (ed) Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 262–278.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbotham O, Woodhouse T and Miall H (2011) Contemporary Conflict Resolution (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranciére J (1991) The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rencière J (2009) The Emancipated Spectator. Trans. G Elliott. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond OP (2006) The Transformation of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond OP (2008) Peace in International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond OP (2010) A Genealogy of Peace and Conflict Theory. In Richmond OP (ed) Palgrave Advances to Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 14–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond OP (2011) A Post-Liberal Peace. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond OP (2014) Failed Statebuilding: Intervention, the State, and the Dynamics of Peace Formation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond OP (2016) Peace Formation and Political Order in Conflict Affected Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond OP and Mac Ginty R (2015) Where Now for the Critique of the Liberal Peace? Cooperation and Conflict 50(2): 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruane J and Todd J (1996) The Dynamics of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Power, Conflict and Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tadjbakhsh S (2010) Human Security and the Legitimisation of Peacebuilding. In Richmond OP (ed) Palgrave Advances to Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 116–136.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel R (2006) Transitional Apology. In Barkan E and Karn A (eds) Taking Wrongs Seriously: Apologies and Reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J (2009) Performance Affects: Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly and Security Council (2015) Report of the High-level Independent Panel on Peace Operations on Uniting our Strengths for Peace: Politics, Partnership and People, UN Doc. A/70/95-S/2015/446. UN: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council (2016) Provisional Verbatim of the 7673th Meeting, UN Doc. S/PV.7637, 29 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2012) Kosovo Conflict Assessment: Breaking Down Invisible Walls. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development. Available at http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnaec930.pdf (accessed 31 July 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2014) Kosovo: 2014–2018 Country Development Cooperation Strategy. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development. Available at https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1863/CDCS_Kosovo.pdf (accessed 31 July 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Visoka G (2013) Political Obligations in Kosovo. Pristina: Prishtina Institute of Political Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visoka G (2016) Arrested Truth: Transitional Justice and the Politics of Remembrance in Kosovo. Journal of Human Rights Practice 8(1): 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron J (2000) Cultural Identity and Civic Responsibility. In Kymlicka W and Norman W (eds) Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 155–174.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallensteen P (2015) Quality Peace: Peacebuilding, Victory, and World Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe S (2014) The Politics of Repatriations and Apologies. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S (2002) Beyond Ethnic Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 4. Available at http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2002/nr4/Focus4-2002_Wolff_Kymlicka.pdf (accessed 31 July 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Visoka, G. (2017). The Quest for an Emancipatory Peace. In: Shaping Peace in Kosovo . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51001-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics