Abstract
Academic research and knowledge construction is increasingly organised in collaboration with nonacademic partners and geared towards solving societal challenges. This chapter asks what such a context and explicit collaboration with a nonacademic societal partner means for research in the bachelor’s phase. It discusses 5 years of a MaRBLe project developed in close collaboration with external partners along the lines of a number of continuums identified in education literature (student, staff, or external partner initiated; academic relevance versus relevance for the external partner; product versus process centred; curriculum based or not; larger or smaller groups). The chapter states that such research-based bachelor’s projects provide both opportunities and challenges and involve trade-offs. Students engaged in such projects learn academic and professional skills that are less prominent in non-collaborative academic projects. The collaboration with an external partner is likely to lead to an emphasis on knowledge utilisation (by the students and the external partner) in addition to – and sometimes perhaps in tension with – academic relevance. In terms of continuums, it turns out that the collaboration itself, the intensity of the collaboration, and the duration of the collaboration matter more to the content and setup of a project than which actor initiated the research. To what extent research-based bachelor’s projects in collaboration with a nonacademic partner are feasible, preferable, or acceptable depends on what one wants students to learn and to what extent knowledge utilisation should be part of undergraduate research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
By the end of the academic year 2014–2015 and over a period of 5 years, 27 MaRBLe theses have been produced within this MaRBLe project.
- 2.
European Studies students had to write a MaRBLe paper and a separate bachelor’s thesis.
- 3.
The chapter speaks of relevance to the external partner rather than societal relevance as it does not want to give the impression that academic research is not of societal relevance.
References
Beckman, M., & Hensel, N. (2009). Making explicit the implicit: Defining undergraduate research. CUR Quarterly, 29(4), 40–44.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740–760.
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2014). Knowledge utilisation manual – Innovational research incentives scheme 2014. The Hague.http://www.nwo.nl/binaries/content/documents/nwo-en/common/documentation/application/nwo/innovational-research-incentives-scheme---knowledge-utilisation-manual
NWO Policies. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Retrieved from: http://www.nwo.nl/en/policies/knowledge+utilisation
van Drooge, L., van den Besselaar, P., Elsen, G. M. F., de Haas, M., van den Heuvel, J. J., Maassen van den Brink, H., & Westenbrink, R. (2010). Evaluating the societal relevance of academic research: A guide. (ERiC). The Hague: ERiC-Evaluating Research in Context.
Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown::A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 393–409.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zeiss, R. (2017). Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences: Changing Research Contexts. In: Bastiaens, E., van Tilburg, J., van Merriënboer, J. (eds) Research-Based Learning: Case Studies from Maastricht University. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50993-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50993-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50991-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50993-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)