Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion ((NASR,volume 1))

  • 510 Accesses

Abstract

In order to sketch a process pragmatist heuristics of believing, one needs, first, to set the stage of the discussion in classical Greece and especially to introduce the “gnôsis/pistis ” contrast. It is then possible to show how Plato provides useful concepts to understand the history of that contrast. Eventually, James and Whitehead are brought in to specify the process nature of the religious phenomena and to bring the debate up to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “The true method of philosophical construction is to frame a scheme of ideas, the best that one can, and unflinchingly to explore the interpretation of experience in terms of that scheme.” (Timæus at Whitehead 1933)

  2. 2.

    “There is no difference of truth that does not make a difference of fact.” (Peirce 1878:286–302)

References

  • Angel HF (2013) Credition, the process of belief. In: Encyclopedia of sciences and religions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 536–539

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher, Über die Religion. Reden an die Gebildeten unter ihren Verächteren (1799), neu herausgegeben von Rudolf Otto, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Dover Publications, New York. [1950], p 221

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1902) The varieties of religious experience. A study in human nature. Being the Gifford lectures on natural religion delivered at Edinburgh in 1901–1902. Longman, Green, and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1907) Pragmatism. A new name for some old ways of thinking. Longman, Green and Co, New York, pp 73–74

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1911/1996) Some problems of philosophy. A beginning of an introduction to philosophy [Posthumously published by Horace M. Kallen with the assistance from Ralph Barton Perry and Henry James, Jr.], New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta, Longmans, Green, and Co., 1911. Bison Edition, Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1920) The letters of William James. Edited by his son Henry James. The Atlantic Monthly Press, Boston, pp 76–77

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1950) The principles of psychology [1890]. Authorized Edition in two volumes, Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1934) Gnosis und späntantiker Geist. Die mythologische Gnosis, mit Einer Einleitung zur Geschichte und Methodologie der Forschung, vol 1. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerenyi K (1967) Eleusis: Archetypal image of mother and daughter. Translated from the German by Ralph Manheim. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967 [German Original: Die Mysterien von Eleusis, Zürich, Rein-Verlag, 1962]

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddell HG, Scott R (eds) (1987) Gnôsis. In: A Greek-English Lexicon. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1878) How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly:286–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiermacher FDE (1799) Über die Religion. Reden an die Gebildeten unter ihren Verächteren. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernant JP (1990) Mythe et religion en Grèce ancienne. In: Œuvres complètes, vol I. Éditions du Seuil, Paris [2007], p 827

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2006) The hyperdialectics of religiousness and religion. In: Weber M, Rouvillois S (eds) L’Expérience de Dieu. Lectures de religion in the making, Aletheia. Revue de formation philosophique, théologique et spirituelle, pp 115–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2011a) Essai sur la gnose de Harvard. Whitehead apocryphe. Éditions Chromatika, Louvain-la-Neuve

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2011b) Whitehead’s pancreativism. Jamesian Applications. Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt/Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead AN (1929) Process and reality. An essay in cosmology. Gifford Lectures delivered in the University of Edinburgh during the session 1927–28. Corrected Edition. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne The Free Press New York, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead AN (1933) Adventures of ideas. The Free Press, New York [1969], pp 146–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead AN (1964) The concept of nature [1920]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead AN (1969) Adventures of ideas [1933]. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead AN (1978) Process and reality. An essay in cosmology [1929]. The Free Press, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Weber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weber, M. (2017). A Process Pragmatist Heuristics of Believing. In: Angel, HF., Oviedo, L., Paloutzian, R., Runehov, A., Seitz, R. (eds) Processes of Believing: The Acquisition, Maintenance, and Change in Creditions. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics