Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion ((NASR,volume 1))

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the bearings of recent neuroscientific credition research on David Hume’s influential idea in The Natural History of Religion (1757) that religious belief originates in and is sustained by a fear of misery coupled with mistaken beliefs as to the true causes of happiness. I argue that neuroscientific credition research, in particular of the sort associated with the work of Rüdiger Seitz, Hans-Ferdinand Angel and their colleagues, makes it possible, in principle, to provide some degree of empirical confirmation or disconfirmation for Hume’s idea. However, I also argue that this research is incapable of confirming or disconfirming Hume’s idea conclusively. The upshot of this is that Hume-style accounts of the grounds of religious belief would do well to take this sort of research into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a discussion of the historical influence of Hume ’s biblical criticism, see Addinall (2001). For a general survey of the Radical Enlightenment critique of Biblical Christianity, see Israel (2001).

  2. 2.

    For a very different take on Hume ’s aim in the Natural History, see Falkenstein (2003).

  3. 3.

    For example, in a study conducted by Beauregard and Paquette (2006), fifteen Carmelite nuns were asked to recall their strongest experiences of union with God, and in so doing Beauregard and Paquette were able to detect “[s]ignificant loci of activation” in several brain areas, including the left medial prefrontal cortex, the right medial orbitofrontal cortex, and the right middle temporal cortex (Beauregard and Paquette 2006:188). For more on this, see Runehov (2007): 143–151, 173–174, and 2010: 214–215.

References

  • Addinall P (2001) Philosophy and biblical interpretation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel HF (2013) Credition, the process of belief. In: Azari N, Oviedo L, Runehov A (eds) Encyclopedia of sciences and religions, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht/New York, pp 536–539

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Azari N, Nickel J, Wunderlich G, Niedeggen M, Hefter H, Tellmann L, Herzog H, Stoerig P, Birnbacher D, Seitz RJ (2001) Neural correlates of religious experience. Eur J Neurosci 13:1649–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard M, Paquette V (2006) Neural correlates of a mystical experience in Carmelite nuns. Neurosci Lett 405:186–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender F (1968) The natural history of religion by David Hume. Rev Relig Res 10:60–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman D (2000) Hume’s abject failure. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenstein L (2003) Hume’s project in the ‘natural history of religion’. Relig Stud 39:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein J, Adolphs R, Damasio A, Tranel D (2011) The human amygdala and the induction and experience of fear. Curr Biol 21:34–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin JCA (1988) Hume’s philosophy of religion, 2nd edn. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (2012) Leviathan, vol 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (2000 [1748]) An enquiry concerning human understanding. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (2007 [1759]) The natural history of religion. A dissertation on the passions. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd R (1757) Remarks on David Hume’s essay on the natural history of religion. Cadell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel J (2001) Radical enlightenment: philosophy and the making of modernity 1650–1750. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D (1999) Hume, holism and miracles. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail PJE (2007) Understanding Hume’s natural history of religion. Philos Q 57:190–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe D, Rogers S (2013) Neuropschology. In: Azari N, Oviedo L, Runehov A (eds) Encyclopedia of sciences and religions, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht/New York, pp 1500–1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossner E (1980) The life of David Hume, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A (2000) Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A (2011) Where the conflict really lies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runehov A (2007) Sacred or neural? The potential of neuroscience to explain religious experience. Vandenhoeck & Ruprect, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Runehov A (2010) Naturalistic understandings of religious experiences. In: Engberg-Pedersen T, Henrik Gregersen N (eds) Essays in naturalism and Christian semantics. Publications from the Faculty of Theology, Copenhagen, no. 18, pp 201–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell P (2008) The riddle of Hume’s treatise: skepticism, naturalism, and irreligion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz R, Angel HF (2012) Processes of believing – a review and conceptual account. Rev Neurosci 23:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen A (1909) David Hume’s natural history of religion. Monist 19:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Kraal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kraal, A. (2017). Hume on the Origins of Religious Belief. In: Angel, HF., Oviedo, L., Paloutzian, R., Runehov, A., Seitz, R. (eds) Processes of Believing: The Acquisition, Maintenance, and Change in Creditions. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics