Abstract
Eight factors have been identified in the personal characteristics that contribute to increased chances of survival in a disaster (“power to live”). To understand the role of the believing process during disasters, I will map these eight factors onto the two-dimensional matrix defined by the four credition functions crossed with three levels of internal schema of the self and world. In the face of adversity, the enclosure function seems to contribute the factors problem solving and emotional regulation by adaptive belief organization at the physical or interpersonal level and social-value level, respectively. For survival in the context of group dynamics, the converter function may facilitate the factors altruism and leadership by intimate association of the social situations with relevant interpersonal behaviors at the physical or interpersonal level and social-value level, respectively. In the face of confrontations with values, the stabilizer function can support the factors stubbornness and self-transcendence by protecting the values or beliefs in the physical level and interpersonal or social-value level, respectively. Finally, in the context of the optimization of the modulator function, the factor active well-being may facilitate the maintenance of the environment on the physical level and and etiquette do so on the interpersonal or social-value level. The mapping was in part validated from etiological perspectives. This map supports the comprehensiveness of the eight-factor model of the power to live and provides hypotheses of its neurocognitive underpinning. This, in turn, suggests the utility of the combined framework of the credition and the levels of internal schema.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angel HF (2006) Religiosität als menschliches Potential. Ein anthropologisches Modell im neurowissenschaftlichen Horizont. In: Angel HF, Broking-Bortfeldt M, Hemel U, Kunstmann J, Jakobs M, Pirner ML, Rothgangel M (eds) Religiosität. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 62–89
Angel HF (2013) Credition, the process of belief. In: Runehov A, Oviedo L (eds) Encyclopedia of sciences and religions. Springer, Dordrecht
Baltes PB, Smith J (2008) The fascination of wisdom: its nature, ontogeny, and function. Perspect Psychol Sci 3(1):56–64. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00062.x
Coltheart M (2010) The neuropsychology of delusions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1191:16–26. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05496.x
Craig AD (2002) How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(8):655–666
Devinsky O (2009) Delusional misidentifications and duplications right brain lesions, left brain delusions. Neurology 72(1):80–87. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000338625.47892.74
Festinger LA (1957) Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Friston K (2010) The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci 11(2):127–138. doi:10.1038/Nrn2787
Frith CD, Frith U (2006) The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4):531–534. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001
Iacoboni M (2009) Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annu Rev Psychol 60:653–670. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604
Langdon R, Coltheart M (2000) The cognitive neuropsychology of delusions. Mind Lang 15(1):184–218. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00129
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (2005) A mind and body sustaining a “zest for living”. National Printing Bureau, Tokyo
Seitz RJ, Angel HF (2012) Processes of believing – a review and conceptual account. Rev Neurosci 23(3):303–309. doi:10.1515/revneuro-2012-0034
Seitz RJ, Franz M, Azari NP (2009) Value judgments and self-control of action: the role of the medial frontal cortex. Brain Res Rev 60(2):368–378. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.02.003
Siebert A (2010) Survivor personality: why some people are stronger, smarter, and more skillful at handling life’s difficulties…and how you can be, too. Penguin, New York
Sugiura M (2013) Associative account of self-cognition: extended forward model and multi-layer structure. Front Hum Neurosci 7:535. doi:10.3389/Fnhum.2013.00535
Sugiura M, Sato S, Nouchi R, Honda A, Abe T, Muramoto T, Imamura F (2015a) Eight personal characteristics associated with the power to live with disasters as indicated by survivors of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster. PLoS One 10(7):e0130349. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130349
Sugiura M, Seitz RF, Angel HF (2015b) Models and neural bases of the believing process. J Behav Brain Sci 5(1):12–23. doi:10.4236/jbbs.2015.51002
Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG (1996) The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress 9(3):455–471
Turner RJ (1981) Social support as a contingency in psychological well-being. J Health Soc Behav 22(4):357–367. doi:10.2307/2136677
Urgesi C, Aglioti SM, Skrap M, Fabbro F (2010) The spiritual brain: selective cortical lesions modulate human self-transcendence. Neuron 65(3):309–319. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.026
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this manuscript was in part supported by KAKENHI (26118702) from JSPS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sugiura, M. (2017). The Power to Live with Disasters: Adaptive Believing Processes of the Self and World. In: Angel, HF., Oviedo, L., Paloutzian, R., Runehov, A., Seitz, R. (eds) Processes of Believing: The Acquisition, Maintenance, and Change in Creditions. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50922-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50924-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)