Skip to main content

Environmental Accounting: Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Accounting and Reporting

Abstract

With the rise of industrial facilities in the world, more and more costs and losses for activities related to environmental protection. Their value is already hundreds of billions of dollars and they are largely covered by plants using natural resources. For this reason, in many industrialized countries are beginning to try to accommodate the environmental performance of the industry back in the 70s of the twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gray et al. (1987).

  2. 2.

    Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament (2009).

  3. 3.

    The EXIOPOL research project (an integrated project funded by the European Commission under the 6th framework programme, priority 6.3 Global Change and Ecosystems) aims to create an expanded framework of incoming and outgoing information for the assessment of environmental impacts and external costs of economic sectors of final consumption and resource use in the EU: http://www.feem-project.net/exiopol/

    See also: Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector, February 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/transport/sustainable/doc/2008_costs_handbook.pdf

  4. 4.

    Coase (1960).

  5. 5.

    The problem of external effects or “externalities” is put in science for the first time by Arthur Cecil Pigou, but the solution is treated by him in the neo-classical sense.

  6. 6.

    Diseconomy—contrary to the economy (of scale): economic disadvantage, such as increased costs resulting from the increase in the size of the organization or due to damages caused by a business. In an ideal world, non-savings should be minimized.

  7. 7.

    Adams and Larrinaga-González (2007).

  8. 8.

    Contrafatto (2011).

  9. 9.

    Oxford Dictionary of Advanced Learners.

  10. 10.

    Adams and Larrinaga-Gonzáles (2007).

  11. 11.

    Regarding this: “the ‘tone from the top’ is as important in environmental matters as it is in ethical ones…this becomes even more apparent when it is realized that what is needed is a cultural change” (Gray et al. 1993, p. 45).

  12. 12.

    “If the business and accounting environmental agenda are the only games in town, one can choose to play or not to play” (Gray et al. 1993, p.305). Again: “But such incremental change will mean little without fundamental systemic change. Only a complete change of paradigm is likely to allow humanity to become part of ‘environment’ rather than its exploiter” (Gray et al. 1993, p. 307).

  13. 13.

    http://www.fondazioneoic.eu/

  14. 14.

    http://www.gruppobilanciosociale.org/

  15. 15.

    EU documents, European Commission, Green Paper 2002, p. 5.

  16. 16.

    http://www.camcom.gov.it/cdc/

  17. 17.

    Diplografiya = dual accounting.

  18. 18.

    Spasov (1999).

  19. 19.

    Trifonov (2010).

  20. 20.

    BGN (lev) = 1.95583 EU (fixed course in situation of Currency Board from July 1st, 1997).

  21. 21.

    Johansson (2007)

  22. 22.

    International Property Index Report 2010, http://www.internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/

  23. 23.

    Source: World Economic Forum 2009, http://www.weforum.org/404.html#network1

  24. 24.

    European Commission, Eurobarometer, 67, 2007, p. 35.

  25. 25.

    Foundation “Charities Aid for Bulgaria”: http://bcaf.bg/Bulgarian/NewsArticles2.aspx?article=25392

  26. 26.

    Annual financial statements, profit and loss account, Caritas Bulgaria for 2009.

  27. 27.

    Republic of Bulgaria, Ministry Council, Government has adopted a strategy for corporate social responsibility, http://www.government.bg/cgi-bin/e-cms/vis/vis.pl?s=001&p=0228&n=362&g=

References

  • Adams, C. A. (1999). The nature and processes of corporate reporting on ethical issues (pp. 1–64). London: CIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. & Larrinaga-González, C. (2007). Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 333–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, H., & Compagnoni, F. (2008). Fondare la responsabilità sociale d’impresa. Roma: Città Nuova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaduzzi, A., & Paolone, G. (1986). I bilanci di esercizio delle imprese. Torino: UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amodeo, D. (1970). Il bilancio delle società per azioni come strumento di informazione. Rivista dei Dottori Commercialisti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena, P., Beda, A., & Benanti, G. (Eds.). (2006). The corporate social responsibility. Scientific development and implementation. Roma: Aracne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, L. (2004). Quale responsabilità sociale per l’impresa? Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M. G. (Ed.). (2010). Civil economy, democracy, transparency and social and environmental accounting research role: Some reflections in theory and practice deriving from 2nd CSEAR conference—Italy. Milano: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M. G., Demartini, P. & Mošnja-Škare, P. (2007). International accounting standard for SMEs: Empirical evidences from SMEs in a country in transition and in a developed country facing new challenges. Pola (Croazia), Juraj Dobrila University of Pula Department of Economics and tourism “Dr. Mijo Mirkovic”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M. G. & Nesheva Kioseva, N. (2012). Social and environmental accounting and reporting institutional factors: Comparative analysis Bulgaria/Italy. In Arena, P. & Cardillo, E. (eds.) Social and environmental accounting. Research advances and new perspectives (pp. 63–137). Roma: ARACNE. ISBN 978-88-311-0167-7. doi:10.4399/97888548xxxxx0. www.aracneeditrice.it

  • Bandettini, A. (1981). Responsabilità sociali dell’azienda e bilancio d’esercizio. In AA.VV (eds.), Bilancio d’esercizio e amministrazione delle imprese. Studi in onore di Pietro Onida. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrit, R., & Shaltegger, S. (2001). Eco efficiency in corporate budgeting. Luneburg: Centre for Sustainability Management, e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buscarini, C. (2005). Il divenire dell’impresa “responsabile”. Un’ipotesi di bilancio sociale per le PMI italiane. Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanini, C. (1979). Teoria dei conti e teoria dei valori nel sistema dei fenomeni d’azienda. Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catturi, G. (1993). Sul contenuto scientifico dell’ ecologia aziendale, in Scritti in onore di Carlo Masini. Milano: EGEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccherelli, A. (1968). Il Linguaggio dei bilanci. Formazione e interpretazione dei bilanci commerciali. Formazione e interpretazione dei bilanci commerciali. Firenze: Le Monnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(October), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contrafatto, M. (2011). Social and environmental accounting and engagement research: Reflections on the state of the art and new research avenues. Economia Aziendale Online, 2(3): 273–289. www.economiaaziendale.it

  • Contrafatto, M., & Rusconi, G. (2005). Social accounting in Italy: Origins and developments. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal, Sept, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ippolito, T. (1975). I principi contabili razionali ed i principi contabili di comune accettazione. Rivista dei Dottori commercialisti, 2, 868–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Santis, G., & Ventrella, A. M. (1980). Il bilancio sociale dell’impresa. Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2007). Una Responsabilità sociale per più gnerazioni nel gruppo FBL-Della Rovere. Economia Aziendale Online, 2, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, C. (2007). Social accounting at traidcraft plc: A struggle for the meaning of fair trade. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 423–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC-European Commission. (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Green Paper. 3157 COM(2001) 366 final, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC-European Commission. (2002). Responsabilità sociale delle imprese: Un contributo delle imprese allo sviluppo sostenibile. (2002)347 def, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). Eurobarometer 69. Public opinion in the European Union, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E., Harrison, S., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & Call, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gancheva, V. (2007). Capacity of NGOs to provide local and regional sustainable development. In Collection integration and sustainable development (pp. 147–148).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenkron, A. (1978). Economic backwardness in historical perspective, a book of essays. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannessi, E. (1960). Le aziende di produzione originaria, Vol. I, Le aziende agricole. Pisa: Cursi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Adams, C. A., & Owen, D. (2014). Accountability, social responsibility and sustainability: Accounting for society and environment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. U., Bebbington, J., & Walters, D. (1993). Accounting for the environment. London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. London: Prentice Hall Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H., Owen, D. L., & Maunders, K. T. (1987). Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinna, L. (2009). Voce: Il bilancio sociale. In L. Bruni & S. Zamagni (Eds.), Dizionario di Economia Civile. Roma: Città Nuova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, U. (2007) Structure and performance of the business economy in Bulgaria and Romania, p. 1. Eurostat, industry, trade and services 3/2007. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-07-003/EN/KS-SF-07-003-EN.PDF

  • Lai, A. (1991). Le Aggregazioni di Imprese. In Caratteri istituzionali e strumenti per l’analisi economico-aziendale. Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, A. (2004). Paradigmi interpretativi dell’impresa contemporanea. Teorie istituzionali e logiche contrattuali, Collana Economia—Ricerche. Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrinaga-González, C. (2001). Social and political aspects of the value added statement. Revista de Contabilidad—Spanish Accounting Review, ASEPUC (Asociación Española de Profesores Universitarios de Contabilidad), 4(8), 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2001). Animali relazionali dipendenti. Perché gli uomini hanno bisogno delle virtù. Vita e Pensiero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackevicius, J. (2005). The triumph and fall of socialist accounting: A historical aspect. Ekonomika, 72, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matacena, A. (1984). Impresa e ambiente. Il “bilancio sociale”. Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matacena, A. (1993). Il bilancio d’esercizio. Strutture formali, logiche sostanziali e principi generali. Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasian, G. (2009). Economic imbalances and conflicts, 12.06.2009, Journal Money.bg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miolo Vitali, P. (1978). Problemi ecologici nella gestione delle aziende, Collana di studi economico-aziendali (No. 3). Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, M. (2004). PMI: quale responsabilità sociale? Economia & Management, 1, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. N. (2007). Le nuove frontiere della giustizia, Bologna: Il Mulino (o.e. Frontiers of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionary of Advanced Learners. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Oxford University Press ELT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paganelli, O. (1974). Il bilancio d’esercizio. Problemi di valutazione. Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D. (2005). Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 842–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report from the Commission to the Council and the European parliament, GDP and beyond measuring progress in a changing world, Brussels focusing, 08/20/2009. COM (1994) 670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusconi, G. (2006). Il bilancio sociale. Milano: Ediesse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusconi, G. (1988). Il bilancio sociale dell’impresa. Problemi e prospettive. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusconi, G., & Dorigatti, M. (Eds.). (2006). Impresa e responsabilità sociale, Collana: Persona, Imprese e Società (Vol. 6). Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signori, S., & Rusconi, G. (2009). Ethical thinking in the traditional Italian Economia Aziendale and the stakeholder management theory, the search for possible interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spasov, D. (1999). The first Bulgarian commercial paper (150 years since the publication of Diplografiya brothers Stoyan Hristo Kraminkovi), Journal Narodostopanski Archiv, Svishtov, pp. 46–49. http://dlib.uni-svishtov.bg/bitstream/handle/10610/1153/na1999-3-7-D._Spasov.swf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

  • Trifonov, T. (2010). Theoretical basis of accounting (Teortichni Osnovi na Schetovodstvoto) (p. 15). Sofia: Stopanstvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermiglio, F. (1984). Il bilancio sociale nel quadro evolutivo del sistema d’impresa. Messina: Grafo editore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baldarelli, MG., Nesheva-Kiosseva, N. (2017). Environmental Accounting: Conceptual Framework. In: Environmental Accounting and Reporting. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50918-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics