Abstract
Standard approaches to the study of information diffusion draw on analogies to the transmission of diseases or computer viruses, and find that adding more random ties to a network increases the speed of information propagation through it. However, a person sharing information in a social network differs from a computer transmitting a virus in two important respects: a person may not have the opportunity to pass the information to every tie, and may be unwilling to pass the information to certain ties even when presented with the opportunity. Accounting for these two features reveals that, while additional random ties allow information to jump to distant regions of a network, they also change the composition of network neighborhoods. When the latter increases the proportion of neighbors to whom people are less willing to pass information, the result can be a net decrease in diffusion. I show that this is the case in heterogeneous, homophilous networks: the addition of random ties strictly impedes information dissemination, and the impediment is increasing in both original homophily and the number of new ties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A.G., Duflo, E., Jackson, M.O.: The diffusion of microfinance. Science 341(6144) (2013)
Banerjee, A.V., Chandrasekhar, A., Duflo, E., Jackson, M.O.: Gossip: Identifying central individuals in a social network. Available at SSRN 2425379 (2014)
Centola, D.: The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. science 329(5996), 1194–1197 (2010)
Centola, D., Macy, M.: Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American journal of Sociology 113(3), 702–734 (2007)
Centola, D.M.: Homophily, networks, and critical mass: Solving the start-up problem in large group collective action. Rationality and society 25(1), 3–40 (2013)
Chiang, Y.S.: Birds of moderately different feathers: Bandwagon dynamics and the threshold heterogeneity of network neighbors. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 31(1), 47–69 (2007)
Chwe, M.: Communication and Coordination in Social Networks. Review of Economic Studies 67(1), 1–16 (2000)
Dodds, P.S.,Watts, D.J.: Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion. Physical review letters 92(21), 218,701 (2004)
Dodds, P.S.,Watts, D.J.: A generalized model of social and biological contagion. Journal of theoretical biology 232(4), 587–604 (2005)
Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of collective behavior. American journal of sociology pp. 1420–1443 (1978)
Jackson, M.O., Rogers, B.W.: Relating network structure to diffusion properties through stochastic dominance. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 7(1) (2007)
Kleinberg, J.: Small-world phenomena and the dynamics of information. Advances in neural information processing systems 1, 431–438 (2002)
Larson, J.M.: Networks and interethnic cooperation. Journal of Politics Forthcoming (2017)
Larson, J.M., Lewis, J.I.: Ethnic networks. American Journal of Political Science Forthcoming (2017)
Larson, J.M., Lewis, J.I.: Rumors, kinship networks, and rebel group formation. Working Paper (2016)
López-Pintado, D.: Diffusion in complex social networks. Games and Economic Behavior 62(2), 573–590 (2008)
Miguel, E., Gugerty, M.K.: Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in kenya. Journal of Public Economics 89(11-12), 2325–2368 (2005)
Nematzadeh, A., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., Ahn, Y.Y.: Optimal network modularity for information diffusion. Physical review letters 113(8), 088,701 (2014)
Newman, M.E.: Models of the small world. Journal of Statistical Physics 101(3-4), 819–841 (2000)
Newman, M.E.: Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Physical review E 66(1), 016,128 (2002)
Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical review letters 86(14), 3200 (2001)
Robinson, A.L.: Nationalism and ethnic-based trust evidence from an african border region. Comparative Political Studies Advanced Online Publication. doi: 0010414016628269 (2016)
Siegel, D.A.: Social networks and collective action. American Journal of Political Science 53(1), 122–138 (2009)
Valente, T.W.: Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social networks 18(1), 69–89 (1996)
Valente, T.W., Davis, R.L.: Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566(1), 55–67 (1999)
Young, H.P.: Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: Contagion, social influence, and social learning. The American economic review 99(5), 1899–1924 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Larson, J.M. (2017). Information Diffusion in Heterogeneous Groups. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Quattrociocchi, W., Sala, A. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications V. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2016 2016. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 693. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50900-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50901-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)