Skip to main content

A Hypotheses-driven Bayesian Approach for Understanding Edge Formation in Attributed Multigraphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 693))

Abstract

Understanding edge formation represents a key question in network analysis. Various approaches have been postulated across disciplines ranging from network growth models to statistical (regression) methods. In this work, we extend this existing arsenal of methods with a hypotheses-driven Bayesian approach that allows to intuitively compare hypotheses about edge formation on attributed multigraphs. We model the multiplicity of edges using a simple categorical model and propose to express hypotheses as priors encoding our belief about parameters. Using Bayesian model comparison techniques, we compare the relative plausibility of hypotheses which might be motivated by previous theories about edge formation based on popularity or similarity. We demonstrate the utility of our approach on synthetic and empirical data. This work is relevant for researchers interested in studying mechanisms explaining edge formation in networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 us election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd int. workshop on Link discovery, pp. 36–43. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casiraghi, G., Nanumyan, V., Scholtes, I., Schweitzer, F.: Generalized hypergeometric ensembles: Statistical hypothesis testing in complex networks. arXiv:1607.02441 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A.X., Fienberg, S.E., Airoldi, E.M.: A survey of statistical network models. Foundations and TrendsR in Machine Learning 2(2), 129–233 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the american Statistical association 76(373), 33–50 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hubert, L., Schultz, J.: Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology 29(2), 190–241 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karrer, B., Newman, M.E.: Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks. Physical Review E 83(1), 016,107 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kass, R.E., Raftery, A.E.: Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430), 773–795 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, M., Leskovec, J.: Modeling social networks with node attributes using the multiplicative attribute graph model. In: UAI 2011, Barcelona, Spain, July 14-17, 2011, pp. 400–409 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiti, M.C., Tizzoni, M., Kinyanjui, T.M., Koech, D.C., Munywoki, P.K., Meriac, M., Cappa, L., Panisson, A., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., et al.: Quantifying social contacts in a household setting of rural kenya using wearable proximity sensors. EPJ Data Science 5(1), 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krackhardt, D.: Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social networks 10(4), 359–381 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruschke, J.: Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Academic Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, T., Ball, B., Karrer, B., Newman, M.: Coauthorship and citation patterns in the physical review. Physical Review E 88(1), 012,814 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moreno, S., Neville, J.: Network hypothesis testing using mixed kronecker product graph models. In: Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 1163–1168. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen, H.T.: Multiple hypothesis testing on edges of graph: a case study of bayesian networks

    Google Scholar 

  15. Papadopoulos, F., Kitsak, M., Serrano, M.Á ., Boguná, M., Krioukov, D.: Popularity versus similarity in growing networks. Nature 489(7417), 537–540 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pfeiffer III, J.J., Moreno, S., La Fond, T., Neville, J., Gallagher, B.: Attributed graph models: Modeling network structure with correlated attributes. In: WWW, pp. 831–842. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., Lusher, D.: An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social networks 29(2), 173–191 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sampson, S.F.: A novitiate in a period of change: An experimental and case study of social relationships. Cornell University (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schwiebert, L., Gupta, S.K., Weinmann, J.: Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 151–165. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shah, K.R., Sinha, B.K.: Mixed Effects Models, pp. 85–96. Springer New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singer, P., Helic, D., Hotho, A., Strohmaier, M.: Hyptrails: A bayesian approach for comparing hypotheses about human trails on the web. WWW, pp. 1003–1013. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singer, P., Helic, D., Taraghi, B., Strohmaier, M.: Detecting memory and structure in human navigation patterns using markov chain models of varying order. PloS one 9(7), e102,070 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Snijders, T., Spreen, M., Zwaagstra, R.: The use of multilevel modeling for analysing personal networks: Networks of cocaine users in an urban area. Journal of quantitative anthropology 5(2), 85–105 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Snijders, T.A.: Statistical models for social networks. Review of Sociology 37, 131–153 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tu, S.: The dirichlet-multinomial and dirichlet-categorical models for bayesian inference. Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winter, B.: Linear models and linear mixed effects models in r with linguistic applications. arXiv:1308.5499 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xiang, R., Neville, J., Rogati, M.: Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In: WWW, pp. 981–990. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lisette Espín-Noboa , Florian Lemmerich , Markus Strohmaier or Philipp Singer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Espín-Noboa, L., Lemmerich, F., Strohmaier, M., Singer, P. (2017). A Hypotheses-driven Bayesian Approach for Understanding Edge Formation in Attributed Multigraphs. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Quattrociocchi, W., Sala, A. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications V. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2016 2016. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 693. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50900-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50901-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics