Abstract
This chapter synthesizes the findings of the quantitative and qualitative analyses. Here, I reiterate the insights gleaned from the quantitative analyses, and illustrate the ways by which the case studies either support or call into question the proposed causal relationships. Furthermore, I discuss the degree of certainty with which the findings can be accepted, the generalizability of the results to advanced industrial societies, and lastly suggest avenues for further research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amable, B., & Palombarini, S. (2009). A neorealist approach to institutional change and the diversity of capitalism. Socioeconomic Review, 7(1), 123–143.
Birchfield, V., & Crepaz, M. (1998). The impact of constitutional structures and collective and competitive veto points on income inequality in industrialized democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 34, 175–200.
Brady, D., & Leicht, K. (2007). Party to inequality: Right party power and income inequality in affluent western democracies. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series.
Casey, T. (2009). Mapping stability and change in advanced capitalisms. Comparative European Politics, 7(2), 255–278.
Cusack, T. R., Iverson, T., & Soskice, D. (2007). Economic interests and the origin of electoral systems. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 373–391.
Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2007). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socioeconomic Review, 5(1), 149–179.
Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties. New York: Science Editions.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gourevitch, P. A. (2003). Review: The politics of corporate governance regulation. The Yale Law Journal, 112(7), 1829–1880.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, England and New York: Oxford University Press.
Hancké, B. (2009a). Introducing the debate. In B. Hancké (Ed.), Debating varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hancké, B. (Ed.). (2009b). Debating varieties of capitalism: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, A., & Swank, D. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industralized democracies. American Political Science Review, 84, 658–674.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (1999). The making of a polity: The struggle over European integration. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Howell, C. (2007). The British variety of capitalism: Institutional change, industrial relations and British politics. British Politics, 2, 239–263.
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Korpi, W. (2006). Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: Protagonists, consenters, and antagonists. World Politics, 58(2), 167–206.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Manow, P. (2001). New coalitions of welfare state reform. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, C. J., & Swank, D. (2008). The political origins of coordinated capitalism: Business organizations, party systems, and state structure in the age of innocence. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 181–198.
Martin, C. J., & Thelen, K. (2007). The state and coordinated capitalism: Contributions of the public sector to social solidarity in postindustrial societies. World Politics, 60, 1–36.
Roe, M. J. (2003). Political determinants of corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Soskice, D. (1999). Divergent production regimes: Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary captialism (pp. 101–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swank, D. (2001). Political institutions and welfare state restructuring: The impact of institutions on social policy change in developed democracies. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press.
Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political instiutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arsenault, M.P. (2017). Conclusion. In: The Effects of Political Institutions on Varieties of Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50891-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50892-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)