Skip to main content

Political Institutions and Varieties of Capitalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Effects of Political Institutions on Varieties of Capitalism
  • 911 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers a comprehensive review of the literature relevant to the varieties of capitalism debate, specifically, the paradigm’s failure to explain capitalist divergence. The chapter addresses questions of an oversimplified dichotomous typology, the varieties of capitalism’s (VOC) lack of emphasis on political institutions as causal variables, and the relationships between majoritarian and consensus institutions. The chapter ends by proposing an explanation of the relationships between political institutions—those associated with the majoritarian and consensus dichotomy—and the economic arenas proposed by the varieties of capitalism framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlquist, J. (2010). Building strategic capacity: The political underpinnings of coordinated wage bargaining. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B., & Palombarini, S. (2009). A neorealist approach to institutional change and the diversity of capitalism. Socioeconomic Review, 7(1), 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K., Gerber, M., Leimgruber, P., & Beyeler, M. (2008). Comparative political data set 1960–2006. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Retrieved from http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_ger.html

  • Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 634–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (2006). The primacy of politics: Social democracy and the making of Europe’s twentieth century. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (Eds.). (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F., Gerritsen, R., & Vowles, J. (1996a). Conclusion: The great experiment in perspective. In F. Castles, R. Gerritsen, & J. Vowles (Eds.), The great experiment: Labour parties and public policy transformation in Australia and New Zealand. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F., Gerritsen, R., & Vowles, J. (Eds.). (1996b). The great experiment: Labour parties and public policy transformations in Australia and New Zealand. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, D., & Thornley, C. (2009). Globalization and varieties of capitalism: New labour, economic policy and the abject state. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2005). Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, T. R., Iverson, T., & Soskice, D. (2007). Economic interests and the origin of electoral systems. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2007). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socioeconomic Review, 5(1), 149–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersemann, O. (2005). Cowboy capitalism: European myths, American reality. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, P. A. (2003). Review: The politics of corporate governance regulation. The Yale Law Journal, 112(7), 1829–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, England and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hancké, B. (2009). Introducing the debate. In B. Hancké (Ed.), Debating varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, R. L. (1986). The worldly philosophers: The lives, times and ideas of the great economic thinkers (6th ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (1999). The making of a polity: The struggle over European integration. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, C. (2003). Varieties of capitalism: And then there was one? Comparative Politics, 36(1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, C. (2007). The British variety of capitalism: Institutional change, industrial relations and British politics. British Politics, 2, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., Ragin, C., Stephens, J., Brady, D., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Comparative Welfare Data Set. http://www.nsd.uib.no/macrodataguide/set.html?id=8&sub=1

  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (2000). Partisan governance, women’s employment, and the Social democratic service state. American Sociological Review, 65, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T., & Stevens, J. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 600–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G., & Stephens, J. D. (Eds.). (1999). Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus democracies in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manow, P. (2009). Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review, 7, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mares, I. (2001). Firms in the welfare state: When, why, and how does social policy matter to employers? In T. Iversen & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, I. (2003). The politics of social risk: Business and welfare state development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. J., & Swank, D. (2008). The political origins of coordinated capitalism: Business organizations, party systems, and state structure in the age of innocence. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history (1st ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G., & Palmer, M. (1997). Bridled power: New Zealand and government under MMP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (Ed.). (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M. J. (2003). Political determinants of corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, L. T. (1999). Contemporary political ideologies: A comparative analysis (11th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2007). Changes in comparative political economy: Taking labor out, bringing the state back in, putting the firm front and center. Paper presented at the European Studies Association Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting the political back into political economy by bringing the state back in yet again. World Politcs, 61(3), 516–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (1979). Still the century of corporatism? In P. Schmitter & G. Lehmbruch (Eds.), Trends toward corporatist intermediation. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonfield, A. (1965). Modern capitalism: The changing balance of public and private power. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. A. (1999). The internationalization of capital. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1991 [1776]). The wealth of nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. (1999). Divergent production regimes: Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary captialism (pp. 101–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. (2007). Macroeconomics and varieties of capitalism. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Yamamura, K. (Eds.). (2001). The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, D. (2001). Political institutions and welfare state restructuring: The impact of institutions on social policy change in developed democracies. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political instiutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (2001). Varieties of labor politics in the developed democracies. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), The varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (2001). Business, government, and patterns of labor market policy in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany. In P. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arsenault, M.P. (2017). Political Institutions and Varieties of Capitalism. In: The Effects of Political Institutions on Varieties of Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50891-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50892-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics