Skip to main content

Professionalism, Professionalisation and Continuing Professional Development in the Adult Education Arena

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1155 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes how different forms of ‘professionalism’ have been defined, refined, developed and applied to formal education. It compares how policies on professionalisation have been played out in relation to adult educators in England and New Zealand. In England the focus has been on the imposition of a prescriptive form of governmental professionalism across the whole post-compulsory education sector, including adult and community-based education. In New Zealand, the focus has been on introducing a ‘softer’ form of professionalism, ‘owned’ by the sector itself, which promotes professional development as a means of enforcing greater coordination and standardisation across the ACE sector. In both countries policy pronouncements around professionalism have been utilised as a way of increasing government control by holding out the promise of improved status and conditions for adult educators which has not been delivered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • ACE Aotearoa. (2012). Annual report 2012. http://www.aceaotearoa.org.nz/sites/aceaotearoa.org.nz/files/ACE-AnnualReport-2012-web.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2013.

  • Avis, J. (1999). ‘Shifting identity: New conditions and the transformation of practice –Teaching within post-compulsory education’. Journal of Post-compulsory Education and Training 51(2): 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avis, J. (2005). ‘Beyond performativity: Reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education’. Journal of Education Policy 20(2): 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2000). ‘Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society’. Australian Educational Researcher 17(3): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2003). ‘The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity’. Journal of Education Policy 18(2): 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2008a). ‘Performativity, privatisation, professionals and the state’. In B. Cunningham (ed.) Exploring professionalism. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2012). ‘Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university’. British Journal of Educational Studies 60(1): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2008b). The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathmaker, A., and Avis, J. (2012). ‘Inbound, outbound or peripheral: The impact of discourses of “organisational” professionalism on becoming a teacher in English further education’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 34(5): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (2008). ‘Governmental professionalism: Re-professionalising or de-professionalising teachers in England?’ British Journal of Educational Studies 56(20): 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (2009). ‘Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring official knowledge base of England’s “modernised” teaching profession’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 30(1): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2009). Skills for growth. London: DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012a). Professionalism in further education: Interim report of the independent review panel. London: DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012b). Professionalism in Further Education: Final report of the independent review panel. London: DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012c). Consultation on revocation of the further education workforce regulations. London: DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012d). Evaluation of FE teachers’ qualifications (England) regulations 2007. London: DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowl, M. (2007). Adult and community development (ACE) networks and professional development report to the tertiary education commission. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowl, M. (2011). ‘Communities of practice, compliance or resistance? Regional networks in the adult and community education sector in Aotearoa New Zealand’. Community Development Journal 46(2): 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codd, J. (1999). ‘Educational reform, accountability and the culture of distrust’. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 34(1): 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codd, J. (2005). ‘Teachers as “managed professionals” in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience’. Educational Review 57(2): 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (1999). A Fresh Start: improving numeracy and literacy. The Moser Report. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES. (2001). The post-16 education and training inspection regulations. Statutory Instrument 2001 No 799 London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES. (Department for Education and Skills). (2004). Equipping our teachers for the future: Reforming initial teacher training for the learning and skills sector. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education and Training Foundation. (2014). Professional standards for teachers and trainers in education and training – England http://www.et-foundation.co.uk. Accessed 20 April 2016.

  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professions and their organisation: Teachers, nurses and social workers. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FENTO (Further Education National Training Organisation). (1999). Standards for teaching and supporting learning in further education in England and Wales. London: FENTO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2008). ‘The continuing politics of mistrust: Performance management and the erosion of professional work’. Journal of Educational Administration and History 40(2): 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flexner, P. (1915). ‘Is social work a profession?’ School and Society 1: 901–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaye, A., and Ghaye, K. (1998). Teaching and learning through critical reflective practice. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., Perkin, H., Sockett, H., and Hoyle, E. (1985). Is teaching a profession? London: Bedford Way Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, B. (2012). ‘The trouble with professionals’. Adults learning Leicester: NIACE Summer 2012:40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle. (1981). Continuing learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (1985). ‘The professionalisation of teachers: A paradox’. In P. Gordon, H. Perkin, H. Sockett, and E. Hoyle (eds.) Is teaching a profession? London: Bedford Way Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. (2011). ‘We’ve broken free of the IfL – but what now? Published in FE Focus 5th August 2011. http://www.tes.co.uk/articles.aspx?storycode=6007494. Accessed 11 August 2011.

  • (IfL) Institute for Learning. (2009). IfL review of CPD: Making a difference for teachers, trainers and learners. London: IfL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jephcote, M., and Salisbury, J. (2009). ‘Further education teachers’ accounts of their professional identities’. Teaching and Teacher Education 25: 966–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. S. (1979). The Rise of Professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkley CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M., and Grace, G. (1987). Teachers: The culture and politics of work Lewes: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, N., and Nasta, T. (2010). ‘State regulation and the professionalisation of further education teachers: A comparison with schools and HE’. Journal of Vocational Education and Training 62(2): 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, N., Nasta, T., and Rogers, L. (2012). ‘From fragmentation to chaos? The regulation of initial teacher training in further education’. British Educational Research Journal 38(4): 677–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millerson, G. L. (1964). The qualifying association. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). (2003). The initial training of further education teachers – a survey. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebble, T. (2012). Standards for the ACE sector: A discussion paper. Wellington: ACE Aotearoa/Ako Aotearoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roffey-Barentsen, J., and Malthouse, R. (2009). Reflective practice in the lifelong learning sector. Exeter: Learning Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, T. (1997). ‘Education: deprofessionlized? Or regulated, reorganised and reauthorized’. Australian Journal of Education 41(3): 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synergia. (2010). Evaluation of the implementation of the adult and community education professional development plan 2006–2010. Auckland: Synergia.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC (Tertiary Education Commission). (2001). Koia! Koia! towards a learning society: The report of the adult and community learning working party. Wellington: TEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC (Tertiary Education Commission). (2006). ACE professional development strategy and action plan. Wellington: TEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC (Tertiary Education Commission). (2010b). ‘ACE funding for 2010: Responding to the refocused priorities’. Letter to ACE providers July 15th 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, R. (1996a). ‘What do adult and community educators share in common?’ In J. Benseman, B. Findsen, and M. Scott (eds.) The fourth sector. Palmerston North: Dunmore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, R. (2003). ‘Continuing professional education and professionalization: Travelling without a map or compass?’ International Journal of Lifelong Education 22(5): 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UCU (Universities and Colleges Union). (2012). Towards a UCU policy on professionalism. http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/pdf/c/a/towardsaucuconceptofprofessionalism_may13.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowl, M. (2017). Professionalism, Professionalisation and Continuing Professional Development in the Adult Education Arena. In: Adult Education in Neoliberal Times. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50883-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50883-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50882-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50883-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics