Abstract
This chapter describes how different forms of ‘professionalism’ have been defined, refined, developed and applied to formal education. It compares how policies on professionalisation have been played out in relation to adult educators in England and New Zealand. In England the focus has been on the imposition of a prescriptive form of governmental professionalism across the whole post-compulsory education sector, including adult and community-based education. In New Zealand, the focus has been on introducing a ‘softer’ form of professionalism, ‘owned’ by the sector itself, which promotes professional development as a means of enforcing greater coordination and standardisation across the ACE sector. In both countries policy pronouncements around professionalism have been utilised as a way of increasing government control by holding out the promise of improved status and conditions for adult educators which has not been delivered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
ACE Aotearoa. (2012). Annual report 2012. http://www.aceaotearoa.org.nz/sites/aceaotearoa.org.nz/files/ACE-AnnualReport-2012-web.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2013.
Avis, J. (1999). ‘Shifting identity: New conditions and the transformation of practice –Teaching within post-compulsory education’. Journal of Post-compulsory Education and Training 51(2): 245–264.
Avis, J. (2005). ‘Beyond performativity: Reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education’. Journal of Education Policy 20(2): 209–222.
Ball, S. (2000). ‘Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society’. Australian Educational Researcher 17(3): 1–24.
Ball, S. (2003). ‘The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity’. Journal of Education Policy 18(2): 215–228.
Ball, S. (2008a). ‘Performativity, privatisation, professionals and the state’. In B. Cunningham (ed.) Exploring professionalism. London: Institute of Education.
Ball, S. (2012). ‘Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university’. British Journal of Educational Studies 60(1): 17–28.
Ball, S. J. (2008b). The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bathmaker, A., and Avis, J. (2012). ‘Inbound, outbound or peripheral: The impact of discourses of “organisational” professionalism on becoming a teacher in English further education’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 34(5): 1–18.
Beck, J. (2008). ‘Governmental professionalism: Re-professionalising or de-professionalising teachers in England?’ British Journal of Educational Studies 56(20): 119–143.
Beck, J. (2009). ‘Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring official knowledge base of England’s “modernised” teaching profession’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 30(1): 3–14.
BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2009). Skills for growth. London: DBIS.
BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012a). Professionalism in further education: Interim report of the independent review panel. London: DBIS.
BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012b). Professionalism in Further Education: Final report of the independent review panel. London: DBIS.
BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012c). Consultation on revocation of the further education workforce regulations. London: DBIS.
BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2012d). Evaluation of FE teachers’ qualifications (England) regulations 2007. London: DBIS.
Bowl, M. (2007). Adult and community development (ACE) networks and professional development report to the tertiary education commission. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
Bowl, M. (2011). ‘Communities of practice, compliance or resistance? Regional networks in the adult and community education sector in Aotearoa New Zealand’. Community Development Journal 46(2): 83–91.
Codd, J. (1999). ‘Educational reform, accountability and the culture of distrust’. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 34(1): 45–53.
Codd, J. (2005). ‘Teachers as “managed professionals” in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience’. Educational Review 57(2): 193–206.
Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (1999). A Fresh Start: improving numeracy and literacy. The Moser Report. London: DfES.
DfES. (2001). The post-16 education and training inspection regulations. Statutory Instrument 2001 No 799 London: DfES.
DfES. (Department for Education and Skills). (2004). Equipping our teachers for the future: Reforming initial teacher training for the learning and skills sector. London: DfES.
Education and Training Foundation. (2014). Professional standards for teachers and trainers in education and training – England http://www.et-foundation.co.uk. Accessed 20 April 2016.
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.
Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professions and their organisation: Teachers, nurses and social workers. New York: The Free Press.
FENTO (Further Education National Training Organisation). (1999). Standards for teaching and supporting learning in further education in England and Wales. London: FENTO.
Fitzgerald, T. (2008). ‘The continuing politics of mistrust: Performance management and the erosion of professional work’. Journal of Educational Administration and History 40(2): 113–128.
Flexner, P. (1915). ‘Is social work a profession?’ School and Society 1: 901–911.
Ghaye, A., and Ghaye, K. (1998). Teaching and learning through critical reflective practice. London: David Fulton.
Goodson, I. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Gordon, P., Perkin, H., Sockett, H., and Hoyle, E. (1985). Is teaching a profession? London: Bedford Way Papers.
Groves, B. (2012). ‘The trouble with professionals’. Adults learning Leicester: NIACE Summer 2012:40–41.
Houle. (1981). Continuing learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Hoyle, E. (1985). ‘The professionalisation of teachers: A paradox’. In P. Gordon, H. Perkin, H. Sockett, and E. Hoyle (eds.) Is teaching a profession? London: Bedford Way Papers.
Hunt, S. (2011). ‘We’ve broken free of the IfL – but what now? Published in FE Focus 5th August 2011. http://www.tes.co.uk/articles.aspx?storycode=6007494. Accessed 11 August 2011.
(IfL) Institute for Learning. (2009). IfL review of CPD: Making a difference for teachers, trainers and learners. London: IfL.
Jephcote, M., and Salisbury, J. (2009). ‘Further education teachers’ accounts of their professional identities’. Teaching and Teacher Education 25: 966–972.
Larson, M. S. (1979). The Rise of Professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkley CA: University of California Press.
Lawn, M., and Grace, G. (1987). Teachers: The culture and politics of work Lewes: The Falmer Press.
Lucas, N., and Nasta, T. (2010). ‘State regulation and the professionalisation of further education teachers: A comparison with schools and HE’. Journal of Vocational Education and Training 62(2): 441–454.
Lucas, N., Nasta, T., and Rogers, L. (2012). ‘From fragmentation to chaos? The regulation of initial teacher training in further education’. British Educational Research Journal 38(4): 677–695.
Millerson, G. L. (1964). The qualifying association. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). (2003). The initial training of further education teachers – a survey. London: Ofsted.
Prebble, T. (2012). Standards for the ACE sector: A discussion paper. Wellington: ACE Aotearoa/Ako Aotearoa.
Roffey-Barentsen, J., and Malthouse, R. (2009). Reflective practice in the lifelong learning sector. Exeter: Learning Matters.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Seddon, T. (1997). ‘Education: deprofessionlized? Or regulated, reorganised and reauthorized’. Australian Journal of Education 41(3): 228–246.
Synergia. (2010). Evaluation of the implementation of the adult and community education professional development plan 2006–2010. Auckland: Synergia.
TEC (Tertiary Education Commission). (2001). Koia! Koia! towards a learning society: The report of the adult and community learning working party. Wellington: TEC.
TEC (Tertiary Education Commission). (2006). ACE professional development strategy and action plan. Wellington: TEC.
TEC (Tertiary Education Commission). (2010b). ‘ACE funding for 2010: Responding to the refocused priorities’. Letter to ACE providers July 15th 2010.
Tobias, R. (1996a). ‘What do adult and community educators share in common?’ In J. Benseman, B. Findsen, and M. Scott (eds.) The fourth sector. Palmerston North: Dunmore.
Tobias, R. (2003). ‘Continuing professional education and professionalization: Travelling without a map or compass?’ International Journal of Lifelong Education 22(5): 445–456.
UCU (Universities and Colleges Union). (2012). Towards a UCU policy on professionalism. http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/pdf/c/a/towardsaucuconceptofprofessionalism_may13.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bowl, M. (2017). Professionalism, Professionalisation and Continuing Professional Development in the Adult Education Arena. In: Adult Education in Neoliberal Times. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50883-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50883-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50882-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50883-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)