Abstract
After decades of norm referencing, a criterion-referenced grading system was introduced in Sweden in the mid 1990s. The shift brought about a number of changes at different levels of the educational system. In this, the national tests, with their long tradition and high degree of acceptance, were seen as one way of implementing the new system. Hence, the tests were given several explicit aims, from clarification of subject syllabuses and criteria and active, positive impact on learning, to advisory tools to enhance fair grading at the individual level, as well as stability over time. After a brief introduction of the system and its various developments and challenges, the chapter focuses on the current nature and status of the national tests, including the issue of standard setting. For a number of years, this has been the responsibility of the different universities developing the tests, which has brought about certain differences regarding methods as well as outcomes. Lately, however, attempts have been made to develop a common framework for the tests, including procedures for setting standards. In the chapter, a brief report will be given of this on-going work, which is part of a general analysis of the Swedish national assessment system at large.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The number of students per sample varies from > 80,000 for Swedish, Mathematics and English (the full cohort), between 25,000 and 30,000 for Natural Sciences (a third of the cohort, due to the random distribution of the three subject tests), around 20,000 for Social Sciences (a fourth of the cohort), and c. 8000 for Swedish as a second language (a relatively small group of students).
References
Carlgren, I. (2015). Tänk om… (den ‘nya kunskapsskolan’ inte är en kunskapsskola). [What if… (the ‘new knowledge school’ is not a knowledge school)]. Skola & Samhälle S.O.S. (Nov.12.2015). http://www.skolaochsamhalle.se/om/. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard setting. A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Erickson, G. (2009). Nationella prov i engelska – en studie av bedömarsamstämmighet. [National tests of English – a study of inter-rater consistency.] http://nafs.gu.se/publikationer. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
Gardner, J. (Ed.). (2012). Assessment and learning (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (2006). Barns utbildningssituation. Bidrag till ett kommunalt barnindex [The educational situation of children. A contribution to a municipal children’s index.] Stockholm: Rädda Barnen.
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Erickson, G. (2013). To trust or not to trust? – Teacher marking versus external marking of national tests. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(1), 69–87.
Gustafsson, J-E., Cliffordson, C. and Erickson, G. (2014). Likvärdig kunskapsbedömning i och av den svenska skolan – problem och möjligheter. [Equal assessment of knowledge in and of the Swedish school system – problems and possibilities.] Stockholm: SNS förlag. http://www.sns.se/sites/default/files/likvardig_kunskapsbedomning_web.pdf. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marklund, S. (1987). Skolsverige. Del 5: Läroplaner. [Educational Sweden. Part 5: Curricula.]. Stockholm: Liber.
Messick, S. A. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Moss, P., Girard, B. & Haniford, L. (2006). Validity in educational assessment. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 109–162. London: Sage Publications.
Nusche, D., et al. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education Sweden. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd ilibrary.org/education/oecd-reviews-of-evaluation-and-assessment-in-education_2223. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
Skolinspektionen. (2013). Olikheterna är för stora. [Differences are too large.]. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen. http://www.skolinspektionen.se/sv/Beslutoch-rapporter/Publikationer/. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
Skolverket. (2007). Provbetyg-slutbetyg-likvärdig bedömning? En statistisk analys av sambandet mellan nationella prov och slutbetyg i grundskolan, 1998–2006. [Test grade-final grade-equal assessment? A statistical analysis of the correlation between national tests and final grades in compulsory school.] (Rapport nr 300). Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket. (2014). Så tycker lärarna om de nationella proven. [Teachers’ opinions about the national tests.] 2013. Stockholm: Skolverket; Rapport 401. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3218. Retrieved 26 May 2016.
Skolverket. (2015). Provbetygens stabilitet. [The stability of test grades]. Aktuella analyser Stockholm: Skolverket. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3488. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
Skolverket. (2016). Utvärdering av den nya betygsskalan samt kunskapskravens utformning. [An evaluation of the new grading scale and the design of the knowledge requirements.] Stockholm: Skolverket; Dnr 2014:892. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3652. Retrieved 26 May 2016.
SOU. 2007:28. Tydliga mål och kunskapskrav i grundskolan - Förslag till nytt mål- och uppföljningssystem. [Clear goals and knowledge requirements in compulsory school.] Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet. http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2007/05/sou-200728/. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
SOU. 2016:25. Likvärdigt, rättssäkert och effektivt – ett nytt nationellt system för kunskapsbedömning. [Equivalent, fair and efficient – a new national system for knowledge assessment.] Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet. http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2016/03/sou-201625/. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016
Vlachos, J. (2013). Betygssystem som bäddar för misslyckanden. [A grading system heading for failure.] Ekonomistas, June 2013. https://ekonomistas.se/2013/06/14/. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erickson, G. (2017). Experiences with Standards and Criteria in Sweden. In: Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, JE. (eds) Standard Setting in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50855-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50856-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)