Skip to main content

How Do Finns Know? Educational Monitoring without Inspection and Standard Setting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Standard Setting in Education

Abstract

The Finnish educational system was decentralised in the 1980s and the 1990s. The school inspection system was dissolved and the municipalities as organisers of education were given responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of education and securing that every child has equal possibilities in proceeding through the 9-year basic education consisting of primary education and lower secondary education. A national model for sample-based curricular and thematic assessments was created to ensure equity of education in different parts of the country. Unlike many other countries, Finland decided not to have a comprehensive standardised testing system, and the goals set in the national Core Curriculum were not considered as standards either. Thus, matriculation examination at the end of academic track of upper secondary education remained as the only high-stakes test, but due to extensive possibilities for subject selection and the normative approach still applied in grading the exams, it only produces a limited amount of information that can be used in monitoring the trends of pupil performance. This chapter gives an overview of educational quality monitoring during basic education in Finland, presenting first a short historical review of how the monitoring system has received its current form. Next, the national sample-based assessment system is described before introducing the local ways of monitoring the equity and functionality of basic education. These include the screening of support needs and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the provided support that has been claimed to be one of the explanations behind Finland’s success in international comparisons. Finally, we will discuss whether quality monitoring without standard setting can work and what standard setting could contribute to the Finnish education system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unlike what has erroneously been stated about standardised test in Finland in an article of Andreasen and Hjörne (2014): ‘National standardised external testing was introduced in 1998 and is monitored approximately two times during compulsory School for All pupils. Test results are being used both internally and externally, and especially their external use must be expected to have a profound impact on pedagogical practice.’

References

  • Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, K., & Hjörne, E. (2014). Assessing children in the Nordic countries: Framing, diversity and matters of inclusion and exclusion in a school for all. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic education model, Policy implications of research in education (Vol. 1, pp. 155–172). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Angus, L. (2011). Teaching within and against the circle of privilege: Reforming teachers, reforming schools. Journal of Educational Policy, 27, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basic Education Act. (2010). http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf. Retrieved June 2016.

  • Berg, G., & Wallin, E. (1983). Research into the school as an organization. III: Organizational development in schools or developing the school as an organization? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, G. (1999). Skolkultur—nyckeln till skolans utveckling. En bok för skolutvecklare om skolansstyrning. Göteborg: Gothia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, J. B. (2003). Networks in the policy process: An international perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 591–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E. (2013). Selection and evaluation of teachers in Finland and Sweden. http://slideplayer.com/slide/2974824/. Retrieved June 2016.

  • Gustafsson, J. E., Ehren, M. C. M., Conyngham, G., McNamara, G., Altrichter, H., & O’Hara, J. (2015). From inspection to quality: Ways in which school inspection influences change in schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning, a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautamäki, J., & Kupiainen, S. (2014). Learning to learn in Finland. Theory and policy, research and practice. In R. Deakin Crick, C. Stringher, & K. Ren (Eds.), Learning to learn. International perspectives from theory and practice. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautamäki, J., Harjunen, E., Hautamäki, A., Karjalainen, T., Kupiainen, S., Laaksonen, S., et al. (2008). PISA06: Analyses, reflections, explanations. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautamäki, A., Hautamäki, J., & Kupiainen, S. (2010). Assessment in schools – learning to learn. International Encyclopedia of Education, 2010(3), 268–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautamäki, J., Kupiainen, S., Marjanen, J., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Hotulainen, R. (2013). Oppimaan oppiminen peruskoulun päättövaiheessa: Tilanne vuonna 2012 ja muutos vuodesta 2001 [Learning to learn at the end of basic education: The situation in 2012 and the change from 2001]. University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education, Research Reports 347. Helsinki: Unigrafia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyrynen, Y.-P., & Hautamäki, J. (1977). Människans bildbarhet och utbildningspolitiken. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators, Research in Educational Sciences (Vol. 25). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupari, P., Sulkunen, S., Vettenranta, J., & Nissinen, K. (2012a). More joy for learning. Fourth graders’ reading skills and competences in mathematics and science: International PIRLS and TIMMS-assessments in Finland [In Finnish], Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupari, P., Vettenranta, J., Nissinen, K. (2012b). Searching for learner-centered pedagogy. Learning results of the 8th grade students in mathematics and science. International TIMMS-study in Finland [In Finnish]. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino. Analyses, reflections, explanations. Publication No. 44. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupari, P., Välijärvi, J., Andersson, L, Arffman, I., Nissinen, K., Puhakka, E., Vettenranta, J. (2013). PISA 12 Ensituloksia [PISA 2012: The first results]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2013:20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., Rantanen, P. (2008). EU pre-pilot on learning to learn: report on the compiled data. 2008-1190/001-001 TRA-TRINDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, J. (1998). Ala-asteen lukutesti ALLU. Turku: Turun yliopisto, Oppimistutkimuksen keskus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). Erityisopetuksen strategia [Special education strategy]. Reports of the Ministry of Education 2007:47. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2009). Perusopetuksen laatukriteerit [Quality criteria for basic education]. Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 2009:19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2012a). Koulutuksen arviointisuunnitelma vuosille 2012–2015 [The plan for educational assessment for years 2012 to 2015]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2012:14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2012b). Perusopetuksen laatukriteerit [Quality criteria for basic education]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2012:29.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Education. (1999). A framework for evaluating educational outcomes in Finland. National Board of Education, Evaluation 8/1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Education. (2004a). National Core Curriculum for basic education 2004. http://www.oph.fi/english/publications/2009/national_core_curricul_for_basic_education. Retrieved 1 June 2011.

  • National Board of Education. (2004b). Summary of four national assessments of mathematics learning in the 9th grade of basic education, 1998–2004. http://www.oph.fi/download/47697_4_matikkaa_englanniksi.pdf. Retrieved 16 Mar 2016.

  • National Board of Education. (2016). Curriculum reform 2016. Renewal of the core curriculum for the pre-primary and basic education. http://www.oph.fi/english/education_development/current_reforms/urriculum_reform_2016. Retrieved 10 Apr 2016.

  • OECD. (2007). Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Results from PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en. Retrieved June 2016.

  • OECD (2015). Education at a glance 2015. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en. Retrieved June 2016.

  • Ouakrim-Soivio, N. (2013). Toimivatko päättöarvioinnin kriteerit? Oppilaiden saamat arvosanat ja Opetushallituksen oppimistulosten seuranta-arviointi koulujen välisten osaamiserojen mittareina. [Do the national criteria for students’ final grades work? Teachers’ grading and national assessments as indicators for between-school differences]. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, A., Coolong-Chaffin, M., Christenson, S., Gutkin, T. (2007). Contextual influences and response to intervention: Critical issues and strategies. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. Van Der Heyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention. The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer. Recommendation 2006/962/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal L 394 of 30.12.2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C., Saxenian, A., Miettinen, R., Kristensen, P. H., & Hautamäki, J. (2011). Individualized service provision in the new welfare state: Lessons from special education in Finland (p. 62). Helsinki: Sitra Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (2014). Teacher training and professional development in Europe; In search of effects on educational performance. Keynote presentation at the German Rector’s conference, 20–23 January, Esen. https://www.hrk-nexus.de/fileadmin/redaktion/hrk-nexus/01Logos-Hochschulen/EssenPresentation_Scheerens.ppt. Retrieved June 2016.

  • Tatto, M. (2015). The role of research in the policy and practice of quality teacher education: An international review. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Association of Educational Assessment – Europe. (2012). European framework of standards for educational assessment 1.0. http://www.aeaeurope.net/images/downloads/SW_Framework_of_uropean_Standards.pdf. Retrieved 4 Mar 2013.

  • Thuneberg, H., Vainikainen, M.-P., Ahtiainen, R., Lintuvuori, M., Salo, K., & Hautamäki, J. (2013). Education is special for all – The Finnish support model. Gemeinsam leben, 21(2), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuneberg, H., Hautamäki, J., Ahtiainen, R., Lintuvuori, M., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Hilasvuori, T. (2014). Conceptual change in adopting the nationwide special education strategy in Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 15(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toom, A., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., Stenberg, K., & Kansanen, P. (2010). Experiences of research-based approach to teacher education: Suggestions and future policies. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryggvason, M.-T. (2009). Why is Finnish teacher education successful? Some goals Finnish teacher educators have for their teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(4), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vainikainen, M.-P. (2014). Finnish primary school pupils’ performance in learning to learn assessments: A longitudinal perspective on educational equity. University of Helsinki, Department of Education Research Reports 360. Helsinki: Unigrafia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vainikainen, M.-P., Thuneberg, H., Greiff, S., & Hautamäki, J. (2015). Multiprofessional collaboration in Finnish schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vainikainen, M.-P., Hienonen, N., Lindfors, P., Rimpelä, A., Asikainen, M., Hotulainen, R., & Hautamäki, J. (2016). Oppimistuloksia ennustavat tekijät Helsingin metropolialueen yläkouluissa [Factors explaining the development of learning outcomes in the lower secondary schools of the Helsinki metropolitan area]? Kasvatus, 47(3), 214–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varjo, J., Simola, H., Rinne, R. (2016). Arvioida ja hallita. Perään katsomisesta informaatio-ohjaukseen suomalaisessa koulupolitiikassa [To evaluate and govern: From “looking after” to steering by information” in Finnish education policy]. Publications of the Finnish Educational Research Association, 70. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1007–1037.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vainikainen, MP., Thuneberg, H., Marjanen, J., Hautamäki, J., Kupiainen, S., Hotulainen, R. (2017). How Do Finns Know? Educational Monitoring without Inspection and Standard Setting. In: Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, JE. (eds) Standard Setting in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50855-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50856-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics