Abstract
The Finnish educational system was decentralised in the 1980s and the 1990s. The school inspection system was dissolved and the municipalities as organisers of education were given responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of education and securing that every child has equal possibilities in proceeding through the 9-year basic education consisting of primary education and lower secondary education. A national model for sample-based curricular and thematic assessments was created to ensure equity of education in different parts of the country. Unlike many other countries, Finland decided not to have a comprehensive standardised testing system, and the goals set in the national Core Curriculum were not considered as standards either. Thus, matriculation examination at the end of academic track of upper secondary education remained as the only high-stakes test, but due to extensive possibilities for subject selection and the normative approach still applied in grading the exams, it only produces a limited amount of information that can be used in monitoring the trends of pupil performance. This chapter gives an overview of educational quality monitoring during basic education in Finland, presenting first a short historical review of how the monitoring system has received its current form. Next, the national sample-based assessment system is described before introducing the local ways of monitoring the equity and functionality of basic education. These include the screening of support needs and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the provided support that has been claimed to be one of the explanations behind Finland’s success in international comparisons. Finally, we will discuss whether quality monitoring without standard setting can work and what standard setting could contribute to the Finnish education system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Unlike what has erroneously been stated about standardised test in Finland in an article of Andreasen and Hjörne (2014): ‘National standardised external testing was introduced in 1998 and is monitored approximately two times during compulsory School for All pupils. Test results are being used both internally and externally, and especially their external use must be expected to have a profound impact on pedagogical practice.’
References
Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Andreasen, K., & Hjörne, E. (2014). Assessing children in the Nordic countries: Framing, diversity and matters of inclusion and exclusion in a school for all. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic education model, Policy implications of research in education (Vol. 1, pp. 155–172). Dordrecht: Springer.
Angus, L. (2011). Teaching within and against the circle of privilege: Reforming teachers, reforming schools. Journal of Educational Policy, 27, 231–251.
Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.
Basic Education Act. (2010). http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf. Retrieved June 2016.
Berg, G., & Wallin, E. (1983). Research into the school as an organization. III: Organizational development in schools or developing the school as an organization? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 35–47.
Berg, G. (1999). Skolkultur—nyckeln till skolans utveckling. En bok för skolutvecklare om skolansstyrning. Göteborg: Gothia.
Forrest, J. B. (2003). Networks in the policy process: An international perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 591–607.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (2013). Selection and evaluation of teachers in Finland and Sweden. http://slideplayer.com/slide/2974824/. Retrieved June 2016.
Gustafsson, J. E., Ehren, M. C. M., Conyngham, G., McNamara, G., Altrichter, H., & O’Hara, J. (2015). From inspection to quality: Ways in which school inspection influences change in schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 47–57.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning, a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hautamäki, J., & Kupiainen, S. (2014). Learning to learn in Finland. Theory and policy, research and practice. In R. Deakin Crick, C. Stringher, & K. Ren (Eds.), Learning to learn. International perspectives from theory and practice. London/New York: Routledge.
Hautamäki, J., Harjunen, E., Hautamäki, A., Karjalainen, T., Kupiainen, S., Laaksonen, S., et al. (2008). PISA06: Analyses, reflections, explanations. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.
Hautamäki, A., Hautamäki, J., & Kupiainen, S. (2010). Assessment in schools – learning to learn. International Encyclopedia of Education, 2010(3), 268–272.
Hautamäki, J., Kupiainen, S., Marjanen, J., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Hotulainen, R. (2013). Oppimaan oppiminen peruskoulun päättövaiheessa: Tilanne vuonna 2012 ja muutos vuodesta 2001 [Learning to learn at the end of basic education: The situation in 2012 and the change from 2001]. University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education, Research Reports 347. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
Häyrynen, Y.-P., & Hautamäki, J. (1977). Människans bildbarhet och utbildningspolitiken. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators, Research in Educational Sciences (Vol. 25). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.
Kupari, P., Sulkunen, S., Vettenranta, J., & Nissinen, K. (2012a). More joy for learning. Fourth graders’ reading skills and competences in mathematics and science: International PIRLS and TIMMS-assessments in Finland [In Finnish], Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
Kupari, P., Vettenranta, J., Nissinen, K. (2012b). Searching for learner-centered pedagogy. Learning results of the 8th grade students in mathematics and science. International TIMMS-study in Finland [In Finnish]. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino. Analyses, reflections, explanations. Publication No. 44. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.
Kupari, P., Välijärvi, J., Andersson, L, Arffman, I., Nissinen, K., Puhakka, E., Vettenranta, J. (2013). PISA 12 Ensituloksia [PISA 2012: The first results]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2013:20.
Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., Rantanen, P. (2008). EU pre-pilot on learning to learn: report on the compiled data. 2008-1190/001-001 TRA-TRINDC.
Lindeman, J. (1998). Ala-asteen lukutesti ALLU. Turku: Turun yliopisto, Oppimistutkimuksen keskus.
Ministry of Education. (2007). Erityisopetuksen strategia [Special education strategy]. Reports of the Ministry of Education 2007:47. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2009). Perusopetuksen laatukriteerit [Quality criteria for basic education]. Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 2009:19.
Ministry of Education. (2012a). Koulutuksen arviointisuunnitelma vuosille 2012–2015 [The plan for educational assessment for years 2012 to 2015]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2012:14.
Ministry of Education. (2012b). Perusopetuksen laatukriteerit [Quality criteria for basic education]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2012:29.
National Board of Education. (1999). A framework for evaluating educational outcomes in Finland. National Board of Education, Evaluation 8/1999.
National Board of Education. (2004a). National Core Curriculum for basic education 2004. http://www.oph.fi/english/publications/2009/national_core_curricul_for_basic_education. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
National Board of Education. (2004b). Summary of four national assessments of mathematics learning in the 9th grade of basic education, 1998–2004. http://www.oph.fi/download/47697_4_matikkaa_englanniksi.pdf. Retrieved 16 Mar 2016.
National Board of Education. (2016). Curriculum reform 2016. Renewal of the core curriculum for the pre-primary and basic education. http://www.oph.fi/english/education_development/current_reforms/urriculum_reform_2016. Retrieved 10 Apr 2016.
OECD. (2007). Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Results from PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en. Retrieved June 2016.
OECD (2015). Education at a glance 2015. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en. Retrieved June 2016.
Ouakrim-Soivio, N. (2013). Toimivatko päättöarvioinnin kriteerit? Oppilaiden saamat arvosanat ja Opetushallituksen oppimistulosten seuranta-arviointi koulujen välisten osaamiserojen mittareina. [Do the national criteria for students’ final grades work? Teachers’ grading and national assessments as indicators for between-school differences]. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
Reschly, A., Coolong-Chaffin, M., Christenson, S., Gutkin, T. (2007). Contextual influences and response to intervention: Critical issues and strategies. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. Van Der Heyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention. The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer. Recommendation 2006/962/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal L 394 of 30.12.2006.
Sabel, C., Saxenian, A., Miettinen, R., Kristensen, P. H., & Hautamäki, J. (2011). Individualized service provision in the new welfare state: Lessons from special education in Finland (p. 62). Helsinki: Sitra Studies.
Scheerens, J. (2014). Teacher training and professional development in Europe; In search of effects on educational performance. Keynote presentation at the German Rector’s conference, 20–23 January, Esen. https://www.hrk-nexus.de/fileadmin/redaktion/hrk-nexus/01Logos-Hochschulen/EssenPresentation_Scheerens.ppt. Retrieved June 2016.
Tatto, M. (2015). The role of research in the policy and practice of quality teacher education: An international review. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 171–201.
Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.
The Association of Educational Assessment – Europe. (2012). European framework of standards for educational assessment 1.0. http://www.aeaeurope.net/images/downloads/SW_Framework_of_uropean_Standards.pdf. Retrieved 4 Mar 2013.
Thuneberg, H., Vainikainen, M.-P., Ahtiainen, R., Lintuvuori, M., Salo, K., & Hautamäki, J. (2013). Education is special for all – The Finnish support model. Gemeinsam leben, 21(2), 67–78.
Thuneberg, H., Hautamäki, J., Ahtiainen, R., Lintuvuori, M., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Hilasvuori, T. (2014). Conceptual change in adopting the nationwide special education strategy in Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 15(1), 37–56.
Toom, A., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., Stenberg, K., & Kansanen, P. (2010). Experiences of research-based approach to teacher education: Suggestions and future policies. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 331–344.
Tryggvason, M.-T. (2009). Why is Finnish teacher education successful? Some goals Finnish teacher educators have for their teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(4), 369–382.
Vainikainen, M.-P. (2014). Finnish primary school pupils’ performance in learning to learn assessments: A longitudinal perspective on educational equity. University of Helsinki, Department of Education Research Reports 360. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
Vainikainen, M.-P., Thuneberg, H., Greiff, S., & Hautamäki, J. (2015). Multiprofessional collaboration in Finnish schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 137–148.
Vainikainen, M.-P., Hienonen, N., Lindfors, P., Rimpelä, A., Asikainen, M., Hotulainen, R., & Hautamäki, J. (2016). Oppimistuloksia ennustavat tekijät Helsingin metropolialueen yläkouluissa [Factors explaining the development of learning outcomes in the lower secondary schools of the Helsinki metropolitan area]? Kasvatus, 47(3), 214–229.
Varjo, J., Simola, H., Rinne, R. (2016). Arvioida ja hallita. Perään katsomisesta informaatio-ohjaukseen suomalaisessa koulupolitiikassa [To evaluate and govern: From “looking after” to steering by information” in Finnish education policy]. Publications of the Finnish Educational Research Association, 70. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
Willms, J. D. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1007–1037.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vainikainen, MP., Thuneberg, H., Marjanen, J., Hautamäki, J., Kupiainen, S., Hotulainen, R. (2017). How Do Finns Know? Educational Monitoring without Inspection and Standard Setting. In: Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, JE. (eds) Standard Setting in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50855-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50856-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)