Skip to main content

Cultural Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Cross-Country Efficiency Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 36))

Abstract

The social context exerts an influence on the individuals’ perception and, thus, on start-up decisions. The prevalence of entrepreneurial behaviors differs widely between countries. Economic variables alone are not enough to explain these differences. In this sense, culture seems to play a relevant role in the entrepreneurial process. Cultural diversity may influence the prevalent characteristics of entrepreneurial initiative and thus moderate the effect of economic conditions on entrepreneurship.

Social entrepreneurship has attracted the interest of researchers due to two main reasons. Firstly, it has a complementarity role in the profit maximizing capitalist system. Secondly, governments are playing an increasingly weaker role in addressing social goals within the context of the most recent socioeconomic crisis. Nevertheless, the creation of social ventures does not only depend on the existence of an enabling legal system. What additional factors make citizens aware and willing to start these social ventures vs. the traditional market-based firms? Understanding the specific contextual features that promote the emergence of social enterprises represents an important step forward. In particular, the question of which specific cultural characteristics are more favorable to the development of social entrepreneurship initiatives which may contribute to solve social problems is, therefore, of interest.

Thus, the aim of this chapter is to analyze the complex interaction between cultural values and social entrepreneurship in countries with different income levels. In particular, it investigates the existence of an “efficient” combination of cultural values that maximizes the social entrepreneurship levels in the country. This will also provide information on how other countries can achieve it. For this analysis, we have used two international data sets. On the one hand, the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) measures national cultural orientations. On the other hand, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) provides data on social entrepreneurship activity. The selection of countries was made based on the available data (31 efficiency- and innovation-driven countries participating in both datasets). Empirical analysis consists on an output-oriented data envelopment analysis (DEA) where the inputs are different cultural dimensions and the output is Early-Stage Social Entrepreneurial Activity (SEA).

The results show two efficient cultural models. First, the Latino American model headed by Argentina, characterized by a strong presence of egalitarianism. Secondly, the North American model, with the USA being characterized by the prevalence of mastery and autonomy values. One implication derived from this research is that entrepreneurship policies should take into account the characteristics of the culture in which they will be implemented and the cultural value priorities to be reinforced and/or modified. This analysis opens new lines of research into the effect of culture on social entrepreneurship. It also points to the feasibility of measuring the impact of culture on the levels of social entrepreneurship based on the notion of “efficient culture.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available at http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/cepa/

References

  • Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Public sector efficiency: Evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. Applied Economics, 42(17), 2147–2164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same different or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1993). Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1983). Marx, Schumpeter y la Teoría del Empresario. Revista de Occidente, 21, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (1996). Small business, flexible technology and industrial dynamics. Small business in the modern economy, De Vries lecturers in economics (pp. 63–125). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Z. Acs & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 437–471). New York: Springer US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software. Springer, ISBN: 387452818, 490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012). Empowering women through social entrepreneurship: Case study of a women’s cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (1995). Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1987). Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation: A macro-behavioral perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 8, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, J., Liñán, F., & Santos, F. J. (2009). Cognitive aspects of potential entrepreneurs in Southern and Northern Europe: An analysis using GEM-data. Revista de Economía Mundial, 23, 151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2013). Entrepreneurial quality and regional development: Characterizing SME sectors in low income areas. Papers in Regional Science, 92(3), 495–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2014). About the interactive influence of culture and regulatory barriers on entrepreneurial activity. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 781–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1974). On the measurement of productive efficiency. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Rodríguez, M. R., Velasco-Morente, F., & González-Abril, L. (2010). La eficiencia del sistema de protección social español en la reducción de la pobreza. Papeles de Población, 16(64), 123–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. (2004). Social enterprise: The new economic engine? Business Strategy Review, 15(4), 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, A., & Fischer, S. (2013). Work values as predictors of entrepreneurial career intentions: A longitudinal analysis of gender effects. Career Development International, 18(3), 216–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn, B., Pennings, E., & Thurik, R. (2010). What do we know about social entrepreneurship? An analysis of empirical research. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 71–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabri, M. M. (2005). Commentaries and critical articles: Text-context relationships and their implications for cross cultural management. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(3), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaén, I., & Liñán, F. (2013). Work values in a changing economic environment: The role of entrepreneurial capital. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 939–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaén, I., Fernández-Serrano, J., & Liñán, F. (2013). Valores culturales, nivel de ingresos y actividad emprendedora. Revista de Economía Mundial, 35, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. (2003). The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (pp. 105–140). London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeter, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., & Fernández-Serrano, J. (2014). National culture, entrepreneurship and economic development: Different patterns across the European. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., Santos, F. J., & Fernández, J. (2011). The influence of perceptions on potential entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(3), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., Fernández-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2013a). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurship: The mediating effect of culture. Revista de Economía Mundial, 33, 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., Nabi, G., & Krueger, N. F. (2013b). British and Spanish entrepreneurial intentions: A comparative study. Revista de Economía Mundial, 33, 73–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., & Todorovic, Z. W. (2012). Understanding the role of entrepreneurial quality and national culture on the economic development. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 16(3), 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S. L., Thomas, A. S., & Jaeger, A. M. (2002). National entrepreneurial potential: the role of culture. Economic development and political history. In M. A. Hitt & J. L. C. Cheng (Eds.), Managing transnational firms: Resources. Market entry and strategic alliances (Vol. 14, pp. 221–257). Amsterdam: JAI Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinillos, M. J., & Reyes, L. (2011). Relationship between individualist–collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, T. K., & Clohesy, S. J. (2001). Unleashing new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A philanthropic renaissance. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 2001(32), 109–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Hay, W. M., & Camp, S. M. (1999). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 1999. Executive report. London: London Business School and Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros, M. (2002). Los valores culturales y el desarrollo socioeconómico: una comparación entre teorías culturales. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 99, 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F. J., Barroso, M., & Guzmán, C. (2013). La economía global y los emprendimientos sociales. Revista de Economía Mundial, 35, 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F. J., Roomi, M. A., & Liñán, F. (2016). About gender differences and the social environment in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national differences. Moscow: SU HSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Ros, M. (1995). Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Koveos, P. E. (2008). A framework to update Hofstede’s cultural value indices: Economic dynamics and institutional stability. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1045–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., & Bosma, N. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2009 report on social entrepreneurship. Babson Park, MA: Babson College, Universidad del Desarrollo, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, R., & Dejardin, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship and culture. In M. Van Gelderen & E. Masurel (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in context (pp. 175–186). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism y collectivism. Oxford: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., Thurik, R., van Stel, A., & Noorderhaven, N. (2007). Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries. 1976–2004. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2009). Economic security for a world in crisis. World Policy Journal, 26(2), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2011). Las empresas sociales. Una nueva dimensión del capitalismo para atender las necesidades más acuciantes de la humanidad. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the VIE Project (Cultural Values and Socioeconomic Factors as determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions), which has been financed by the regional government of Andalusia (Department of Innovation. Science and Enterprise; Reference Number: P08-SEJ-03542).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Liñán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaén, I., Fernández-Serrano, J., Santos, F.J., Liñán, F. (2017). Cultural Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Cross-Country Efficiency Analysis. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Teulon, F., Bonet-Fernandez, D. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50850-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics