Abstract
The social context exerts an influence on the individuals’ perception and, thus, on start-up decisions. The prevalence of entrepreneurial behaviors differs widely between countries. Economic variables alone are not enough to explain these differences. In this sense, culture seems to play a relevant role in the entrepreneurial process. Cultural diversity may influence the prevalent characteristics of entrepreneurial initiative and thus moderate the effect of economic conditions on entrepreneurship.
Social entrepreneurship has attracted the interest of researchers due to two main reasons. Firstly, it has a complementarity role in the profit maximizing capitalist system. Secondly, governments are playing an increasingly weaker role in addressing social goals within the context of the most recent socioeconomic crisis. Nevertheless, the creation of social ventures does not only depend on the existence of an enabling legal system. What additional factors make citizens aware and willing to start these social ventures vs. the traditional market-based firms? Understanding the specific contextual features that promote the emergence of social enterprises represents an important step forward. In particular, the question of which specific cultural characteristics are more favorable to the development of social entrepreneurship initiatives which may contribute to solve social problems is, therefore, of interest.
Thus, the aim of this chapter is to analyze the complex interaction between cultural values and social entrepreneurship in countries with different income levels. In particular, it investigates the existence of an “efficient” combination of cultural values that maximizes the social entrepreneurship levels in the country. This will also provide information on how other countries can achieve it. For this analysis, we have used two international data sets. On the one hand, the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) measures national cultural orientations. On the other hand, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) provides data on social entrepreneurship activity. The selection of countries was made based on the available data (31 efficiency- and innovation-driven countries participating in both datasets). Empirical analysis consists on an output-oriented data envelopment analysis (DEA) where the inputs are different cultural dimensions and the output is Early-Stage Social Entrepreneurial Activity (SEA).
The results show two efficient cultural models. First, the Latino American model headed by Argentina, characterized by a strong presence of egalitarianism. Secondly, the North American model, with the USA being characterized by the prevalence of mastery and autonomy values. One implication derived from this research is that entrepreneurship policies should take into account the characteristics of the culture in which they will be implemented and the cultural value priorities to be reinforced and/or modified. This analysis opens new lines of research into the effect of culture on social entrepreneurship. It also points to the feasibility of measuring the impact of culture on the levels of social entrepreneurship based on the notion of “efficient culture.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Available at http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/cepa/
References
Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Public sector efficiency: Evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. Applied Economics, 42(17), 2147–2164.
Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1), 17–34.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same different or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1–22.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
Baumol, W. J. (1993). Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 197–210.
Blaug, M. (1983). Marx, Schumpeter y la Teoría del Empresario. Revista de Occidente, 21, 117–130.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Carlsson, B. (1996). Small business, flexible technology and industrial dynamics. Small business in the modern economy, De Vries lecturers in economics (pp. 63–125). Oxford: Blackwell.
Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Z. Acs & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 437–471). New York: Springer US.
Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software. Springer, ISBN: 387452818, 490.
Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012). Empowering women through social entrepreneurship: Case study of a women’s cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 569–587.
Davidsson, P. (1995). Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7(1), 41–62.
Etzioni, A. (1987). Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation: A macro-behavioral perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 8, 175–189.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
Fernández, J., Liñán, F., & Santos, F. J. (2009). Cognitive aspects of potential entrepreneurs in Southern and Northern Europe: An analysis using GEM-data. Revista de Economía Mundial, 23, 151–178.
Fernández-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2013). Entrepreneurial quality and regional development: Characterizing SME sectors in low income areas. Papers in Regional Science, 92(3), 495–513.
Fernández-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2014). About the interactive influence of culture and regulatory barriers on entrepreneurial activity. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 781–802.
Førsund, F. R., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1974). On the measurement of productive efficiency. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 141–154.
González-Rodríguez, M. R., Velasco-Morente, F., & González-Abril, L. (2010). La eficiencia del sistema de protección social español en la reducción de la pobreza. Papeles de Población, 16(64), 123–154.
Harding, R. (2004). Social enterprise: The new economic engine? Business Strategy Review, 15(4), 39–43.
Hebert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1, 39–49.
Hirschi, A., & Fischer, S. (2013). Work values as predictors of entrepreneurial career intentions: A longitudinal analysis of gender effects. Career Development International, 18(3), 216–231.
Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Hoogendoorn, B., Pennings, E., & Thurik, R. (2010). What do we know about social entrepreneurship? An analysis of empirical research. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 71–112.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jabri, M. M. (2005). Commentaries and critical articles: Text-context relationships and their implications for cross cultural management. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(3), 349–360.
Jaén, I., & Liñán, F. (2013). Work values in a changing economic environment: The role of entrepreneurial capital. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 939–960.
Jaén, I., Fernández-Serrano, J., & Liñán, F. (2013). Valores culturales, nivel de ingresos y actividad emprendedora. Revista de Economía Mundial, 35, 35–51.
Krueger, N. F. (2003). The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (pp. 105–140). London: Kluwer.
Leadbeter, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos.
Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693–714.
Liñán, F., & Fernández-Serrano, J. (2014). National culture, entrepreneurship and economic development: Different patterns across the European. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 685–701.
Liñán, F., Santos, F. J., & Fernández, J. (2011). The influence of perceptions on potential entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(3), 373–390.
Liñán, F., Fernández-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2013a). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurship: The mediating effect of culture. Revista de Economía Mundial, 33, 21–47.
Liñán, F., Nabi, G., & Krueger, N. F. (2013b). British and Spanish entrepreneurial intentions: A comparative study. Revista de Economía Mundial, 33, 73–103.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
Ma, J., & Todorovic, Z. W. (2012). Understanding the role of entrepreneurial quality and national culture on the economic development. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 16(3), 299–313.
Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51–75.
Mueller, S. L., Thomas, A. S., & Jaeger, A. M. (2002). National entrepreneurial potential: the role of culture. Economic development and political history. In M. A. Hitt & J. L. C. Cheng (Eds.), Managing transnational firms: Resources. Market entry and strategic alliances (Vol. 14, pp. 221–257). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
Pinillos, M. J., & Reyes, L. (2011). Relationship between individualist–collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 23–37.
Reis, T. K., & Clohesy, S. J. (2001). Unleashing new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A philanthropic renaissance. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 2001(32), 109–144.
Reynolds, P. D., Hay, W. M., & Camp, S. M. (1999). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 1999. Executive report. London: London Business School and Babson College.
Ros, M. (2002). Los valores culturales y el desarrollo socioeconómico: una comparación entre teorías culturales. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 99, 9–33.
Santos, F. J., Barroso, M., & Guzmán, C. (2013). La economía global y los emprendimientos sociales. Revista de Economía Mundial, 35, 177–196.
Santos, F. J., Roomi, M. A., & Liñán, F. (2016). About gender differences and the social environment in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 49–66.
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.
Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden: Brill.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 2–3.
Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national differences. Moscow: SU HSE.
Schwartz, S. H., & Ros, M. (1995). Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 99–122.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Tang, L., & Koveos, P. E. (2008). A framework to update Hofstede’s cultural value indices: Economic dynamics and institutional stability. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1045–1063.
Terjesen, S., Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., & Bosma, N. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2009 report on social entrepreneurship. Babson Park, MA: Babson College, Universidad del Desarrollo, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
Thurik, R., & Dejardin, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship and culture. In M. Van Gelderen & E. Masurel (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in context (pp. 175–186). London: Routledge.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism y collectivism. Oxford: Westview.
Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–55.
Wennekers, S., Thurik, R., van Stel, A., & Noorderhaven, N. (2007). Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries. 1976–2004. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 133–160.
Yunus, M. (2009). Economic security for a world in crisis. World Policy Journal, 26(2), 5–12.
Yunus, M. (2011). Las empresas sociales. Una nueva dimensión del capitalismo para atender las necesidades más acuciantes de la humanidad. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.
Acknowledgements
This study is part of the VIE Project (Cultural Values and Socioeconomic Factors as determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions), which has been financed by the regional government of Andalusia (Department of Innovation. Science and Enterprise; Reference Number: P08-SEJ-03542).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaén, I., Fernández-Serrano, J., Santos, F.J., Liñán, F. (2017). Cultural Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Cross-Country Efficiency Analysis. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Teulon, F., Bonet-Fernandez, D. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50850-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50850-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50849-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50850-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)