Abstract
Neoliberalism’s policy prescription is an almost exclusive reliance upon the market as the institution to be used for resource allocation and the goal of neoliberalism is to increase foreign investment (McCarthy 2007). Since the state is presumed to be inefficient, neoliberalism eschews any role for the state in responding to the needs of the populace (McCarthy 2007). For example, wages can be kept inordinately low to lure outside corporations and businesses to invest in the Philippines. Under the auspices of neoliberalism, major multilateral agencies such as the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and World Trade Organization, ‘have become increasingly aggressive in their willingness to look inside countries, evaluate their governance structures, and recommend both sweeping and highly specific changes’ (McCarthy 2007, p. 40). These multilateral agencies have called for foreign investors in developing countries to be guaranteed parity rights and protections against expropriation, and to be allowed to freely move investment funds and profits into, and out of, a country as they wish (McCarthy 2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bello, W., Docena, H., de Guzman, M., & Malig, M. L. (2009). The anti-development state: The political economy of permanent crisis in the Philippines. Manila: Anvil Publishing.
Broad, R., & Cavanagh, J. (2011). Reframing development in the age of vulnerability: From case studies of the Philippines and Trinidad to new measures of rootedness. Third World Quarterly, 32(6), 1127–1145.
Hutchcroft, P. (1998). Booty capitalism in the Philippines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Mason, P. (2012). Why it’s kicking off everywhere: The new global revolutions. London: Verso.
McCarthy, J. (2007). Privatizing conditions of production: Trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance. In N. Heynen, J. Mccarthy, S. Prudham, & P. Robbins (Eds.), Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences (pp. 38–50). London: Routledge.
Quimpo, N. G. (2008). Contested democracy and the left in the Philippines after Marcos. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Raluto, R. D. (2015). Poverty and ecology at the crossroads, towards an ecological theology of liberation in the Philippine context. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Tadem, T. S. E. (2011). Introduction: Examining global civil society movements in the Philippines. In T. S. E. Tadem (Ed.), Global civil society movements in the Philippines (pp. 1–24). Manila: Anvil Publishing.
Tyner, J. A. (2009). The Philippines: Mobilities, identities, globalization. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holden, W., Nadeau, K., Porio, E. (2017). Neoliberalism in the Philippines. In: Ecological Liberation Theology. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50782-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50782-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50780-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50782-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)