Abstract
To reason about ethical issues in a thoughtful manner is often seen as a desirable human ability if one is to live a responsible life, both as an individual and as a member of society. Taking its point of departure in Professor of Ethics Daniel Lee’s non-confessional approach to ethics education and Professor of Education Robert Ennis’s definition of critical thinking, this chapter reflects on manifestations of critical thinking in ninth graders’ responses to two tasks concerning ethical issues in the Swedish national tests in religious education. The reflection tries to describe and discuss some critical-thinking skills that are manifested and how these vary among the analysed student responses. The reflection also considers how task design may affect opportunities for students to manifest critical thinking. Further, the reflection discusses whether critical thinking could be a feasible focus point when testing, measuring and assessing students’ ethical reasoning, in order to avoid mixing personal and societal ethical values into the processes of testing, measuring and assessing this kind of reasoning.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The task about the death penalty contains a short text (Appendix 1). But the task is not about the actual text, and the text cannot in any concrete way be used as support for the reasoning the task calls for, i.e. the students cannot base their thoughts about the death penalty and the different ethical perspectives on the text in any reasonable way.
- 2.
This student response, and those presented below, has been translated from Swedish to English by the author. An effort has been made to stay as close to the original written response as possible.
- 3.
See footnote 1.
- 4.
For more on difficulties in assessing and measuring critical thinking, see, for instance, Ennis (2008).
References
Behar-Horenstein, L., & Niu, L. (2011, February). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 25–41.
Carlton, G. J., & Ting, C. J. (2013). Strategies to support ethical reasoning in student argumentation. Issues in Teacher Education, 22(1), 63–75.
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. K. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: Freeman.
Ennis, R. H. (1993, Summer). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186.
Ennis, R. H. (2008, March). Nationwide testing of critical thinking for higher education: Vigilance required. Teaching Philosophy, 31(1), 1–26.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Executive summary “The Delphi Report”. Millbrae: The California Academic Press.
Franck, O. (2014). Gränsöverskridande värden i icke konfessionell etikundervisning: ämnesidentitet och multidisciplinärt lärande i ämnet religionskunskap. [Transcending values in non-confessional ethics education: Subject identity and interdisciplinary learning in religious education.]. Nordidactica – Journal of Humanities and Social Education, 1, 188–211.
Gustafsson, J.-E., Clifordson, C, & Erickson, G. (2014). Likvärdig kunskapsbedömning i och av den svenska skolan – problem och möjligheter [Equivalent assessment of knowledge in and of the Swedish school – problems and possibilities]. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
Halpern, D. F. (2001)[1993]. Assessing the effectiveness of critical thinking instruction. The Journal of General Education, 50(4), 270–286.
Johnson, R. H., & Hamby, B. (2015). A meta-level approach to the problem of defining ‘Critical Thinking’. Argumentation, 29(4), 417–430.
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Larsson, K. (2011). Kritiskt tänkande i samhällskunskap. En studie som ur ett fenomenografiskt perspektiv belyser manifesterat kritiskt tänkande bland elever i grundskolans år 9 [Critical thinking in civics. A study that from a phenomenographic perspective illuminates manifested critical thinking among ninth-grade compulsory school students] Studier i de samhällsvetenskapliga ämnenas didaktik, nr 7. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
Larsson, K. (2013). Kritiskt tänkande i grundskolans samhällskunskap. En fenomenografisk studie om manifesterat kritiskt tänkande i samhällskunskap hos elever i årskurs 9 [Critical thinking in compulsory school civics. A phenomenographic study of ninth- grade students’ critical thinking in civics]. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Lee, D. E. (2006). Academic freedom, critical thinking and teaching ethics. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 5(2), 199–208.
Löfsted, M. (2011). Etik, moral och det goda livet [Ethics, morals and the good life] In M. Löfstedt (Ed.), Religionsdidaktik: mångfald, livsfrågor och etik i skolan [Religious didactics: Diversity, life issues and ethics in school] (pp. 113–124). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
McMillan, J. H. (1987). Enhancing college students’ critical thinking: A review of studies. Research in Higher Education, 26(1), 3–29.
McPeck, J. E. (1990). Teaching critical thinking. Dialogue and dialectic. New York: Routledge.
Meisel, S. I., & Fearon, D. S. (2006). “Choose the future wisely”: Supporting better ethics through critical thinking. Journal of Management Education, 30(1), 149–176.
Menssen S. (1993). Critical thinking and the construction of knowledge. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 37, no. 1, Sept. 1993, s. 85–93.
Moore, T. (2013). Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 506–522.
Norris, S. P. (1985, May). Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educational Leadership, s. 40–s. 45.
Osbeck C., Franck O., Lilja A., Lindskog A. (Forthcoming). Challenges of assessment in ethics as a part of religious education (RE).
Paul, R. (1988). Ethics without indoctrination. A reflective rather than a dogmatic approach to moral education requires critical thinking – For teachers and students – At the center of the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 45(8), 10–19.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2009, Fall). Critical thinking: Ethical reasoning and fairminded thinking, part I. Journal of Developmental Education, 33(1), 36–37.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2010, Fall). Critical thinking: Ethical reasoning and fairminded thinking, part IV. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(1).
Petress, K. (2004). Critical thinking: An extended definition. Education, 124(3), 461–466.
Phillips, V., & Bond, C. (2004, August). Undergraduates’ experiences of critical thinking. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 277–294.
Quellmalz, E. S. (1987). Developing reasoning skills. In J. K. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 86–105). New York: W. H Freeman.
Siegel, H. (2010). Critical thinking. International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 141–145).
Skolverket. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011 [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre, 2011]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket. (2013a). Ämnesprov, läsår 2012/2013, Bedömningsanvisningar årkurs 6, Religionskunskap [Subject tests, 2012/2013. Guidelines for assessment for grade 6, Religious Education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket. (2013b). Ämnesprov, läsår 2012/2013, Bedömningsanvisningar årkurs 9, Religionskunskap [Subject tests, 2012/2013. Guidelines for assessment for grade 9, Religious Education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket. (2013c). Ämnesprov, läsår 2012/2013, Delprov A årkurs 9, Religionskunskap [Subject tests, 2012/2013. Part A, grade 9, Religious Education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket. (2013d). Ämnesprov, läsår 2012/2013, Delprov B årkurs 9, Religionskunskap [Subject tests, 2012/2013. Part B, grade 9, Religious Education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket. (2013e). Ämnesprov, läsår 2012/2013, Lärarinformation årkurs 9, Religionskunskap [Subject tests, 2012/2013. Information for teachers grade 9, Religious Education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Tsui L. (1998). A review of research on critical thinking. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Study of Higher Education, 5–8 Nov 1998.
Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 741–763.
Tsui, L. (2006). Cultivating critical thinking: Insights from an elite liberal arts college. The Journal of General Education, 55(2), 200–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Task 12 (Forgiveness)
The word forgiveness is an important ethical concept. Perhaps you have forgiven someone or experienced being forgiven.
Discuss why forgiveness can be important both for the one asking for forgiveness and the one forgiving.
Task 25 (The death penalty)
Read the text below which deals with an ethical issue. Then solve the task below.
The Death Penalty: Right or Wrong?
The last execution in Sweden occurred in 1910. Johan Alfred Ander, who was convicted of a brutal murder, was executed early one morning in November at Långholmen in Stockholm. In Sweden, as in many other countries, the death penalty has now been abolished. However, it is still being used in several countries, for instance, China and the USA.
In newspapers and online, you can read about horrible crimes almost on a daily basis. For example, it could be about mass murder or serious sexual crimes. In these contexts, sometimes the issue of the death penalty comes up. Some say that the death penalty should be reintroduced in Sweden, while others say that it is the wrong way to go.
Discuss whether the death penalty is right or wrong. You should use the ethical models from the previous task in your discussion. Be aware that the same model can be used to argue both for and against the death penalty.
If you want, you can start your text with one of the following sentences:
-
Whether the death penalty is right or wrong is something that can be discussed. A consequentialist ethicist would probably say ….
-
A deontological ethicist would presumably say ….
-
I think that an intentionalist ethicist probably ….
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsson, K. (2017). Critical Thinking in Students’ Ethical Reasoning: A Reflection on Some Examples from the Swedish National Tests in Religious Education. In: Franck, O. (eds) Assessment in Ethics Education. Evaluating Education: Normative Systems and Institutional Practices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50770-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50770-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50768-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50770-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)