Advertisement

Jane Addams: Pioneer in American Sociology, Social Work and Public Administration

  • Patricia M. ShieldsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice book series (PAHSEP, volume 10)

Abstract

This chapter explores Jane Addams influence on the emerging fields of Social Work, Sociology, and Public Administration in the United States. All three fields began in response to social problems of the late 19th and early 20th century. The advent of railroads and factories led to rapidly expanding wealth, urbanization and industrialization throughout the United States.

Keywords

Social Justice Public Administration Social Ethic Public Sociology Participatory Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and Social Reform: An Arena of Struggle. Social Work, 43(5), 512–525.Google Scholar
  2. Addams, J. (1896). A Belated Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 1(5), 536–550.Google Scholar
  3. Addams, J. (1899). Trade Unions and Public Duty. American Journal of Sociology, 4(4), 448–462.Google Scholar
  4. Addams, J. (1902). Democracy and Social Ethics. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Addams, J. (1905). Problems of Municipal Administration. American Journal of Sociology, 10(4), 425–444.Google Scholar
  6. Addams, J. (1906, October). Municipal Franchise for Women. Bulletin of the League of American Municipalities, 6(4), 143–148.Google Scholar
  7. Addams, J. (1909). The Spirit of Youth and the City Streets. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  8. Addams, J. (1910). Twenty Years at Hull House. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Addams, J. (1912a). A New Conscience and an Ancient Evil. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  10. Addams, J. (1912b). Recreation as a Public Function in Urban Communities. American Journal of Sociology, 17(5), 615–619.Google Scholar
  11. Addams, J. (1914). A Modern Devil Baby. American Journal of Sociology, 20(1), 117–118.Google Scholar
  12. Addams, J. (1930). The Second Twenty Years at Hull House. New York: The Macmillian Co.Google Scholar
  13. Addams, J. (1935). My Friend, Julia Lathrop. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  14. American Society for Public Administration, A. (2016). ASPA Code of Ethics. Retrieved August 4, 2016, from ASPA Code of Ethics: https://www.aspanet.org/ASPA/About-ASPA/Code-of-Ethics/ASPA/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics.aspx?hkey=fefba3e2-a9dc-4fc8-a686-3446513a4533.
  15. Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Austin, D. (1983). The Flexner Myth and the History of Social Work. Social Service Review, 357–377.Google Scholar
  17. Berger, P. (2002, October). Why Public Sociology May Fail. First Things, 126, 27–29.Google Scholar
  18. Bisman, C. (2004). Social Work Values: The Moral Core of the Profession. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 109–123.Google Scholar
  19. Brandt, L. (1907). Charity Organization Society of New York City: A Brief History. New York: Charity Organization Society of New York. http://www.socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/social-work/charity-organization-society-of-new-york-city/
  20. Chambers, C. (1986). Women in the Creation of the Profession of Social Work. Social Service Review, 60(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  21. Crosby, N., Kelly, J., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review, 46(2), 170–178.Google Scholar
  22. Dale, C., & Kalob, D. (2006). Embracing Social Activism: Sociology in the Service of Social Justice and Peace. Humanity and Society, 30(2), 121–152.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, A. (1967). Spearheads of Reform: The Social Settlements and the Progressive Movement, 1890–1914. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, J. (1994). What’s Wrong with Sociology? Sociological Forum, 9(2), 179–197.Google Scholar
  25. Deegan, M. J. (1988). Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  26. Deegan, M. J. (2010). Jane Addams on Citizenship in a Democracy. Journal of Clinical Sociology, 10(3), 217–238.Google Scholar
  27. Deegan, M. J. (2013). Jane Addams, the Hull-House School of Sociology, and Social Justice. Humanity & Society, 37(3), 248–258.Google Scholar
  28. Elshtain, J. B. (2002). Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Farrell, J. (1967). Beloved Lady: A History of Jane Addams’ Ideas of Reform and Peace. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  31. Feagin, J. (2001). Social Justice and Sociology: Agendas for the Twenty-First Century. American Sociological Review, 66, 1–20.Google Scholar
  32. Fields, K., & Stein, J. (2014). The Real World: An Introduction to Sociology. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  33. Fischer, M., Nackenoff, C., & Chmielewski, W. (2009). Jane Addams and the Practice of Democracy. Chicago: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  34. Franklin, D. (1986). Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From Moral Certainty to Rational Inquiry in Social Work Practice. Social Service Review, 504–525.Google Scholar
  35. Freedman, A. (2016). Peace: Shalom is more than the Absence of War. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 7(3), 53–60.Google Scholar
  36. Frederickson, H. G. (1980). The New Public Administration. The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  37. Frederickson, H. G. (1990). Public Administration and Social Equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228–237.Google Scholar
  38. Frey, C. (2007). Jane Addams on Peace, Crime, and Religion: The Beginnings of A Modern Day Peacemaking Criminology. University of Nebraska, Omaha.Google Scholar
  39. Fritz, J. M. (2008). The History of Clinical Sociology in the United States. In J. M. Fritz (Ed.), International Clinical Sociology (pp. 21–35). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Gabriele, K. (2015). Lessons from a Buried Past: Settlement Women and Democratically Anchored Governance Networks. Administration & Society, 47(4), 393–415.Google Scholar
  41. Gade, C. B. (2011). The Historical Development of the Written Discourses on Ubuntu. South African Journal of Philosophy, 30(3), 303–329.Google Scholar
  42. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  43. Giesberg, J. (2000). Civil War Sisterhood: The US Sanitary Commission and Women’s Politics in Transition. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Glaser, G. (2001). Reflections of a Social Work Practitioner: Bridging the 19th and 21st Centuries. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(2), 190–200.Google Scholar
  45. Grant, L., Stalp, M., & Ward, K. (2002). Women’s Sociological Research and Writing in the AJS in the Pre-World War II Era. The American Sociologist, 69–91.Google Scholar
  46. Gross, M. (2009). Collaborative Experiments: Jane Addams, Hull House and Experimental Social Work. Social Science Information, 48(1), 81–95.Google Scholar
  47. Gross, M., & Krohn, W. (2005). Society as Experiment: Sociological Foundations for a Self-Experimental Society. History of the Human Sciences, 18(2), 63–86.Google Scholar
  48. Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (1937). Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  49. Hamilton, R. (2003). American Sociology Rewrites Its History. Sociological Theory, 21(3), 281–290.Google Scholar
  50. Hare, I. (2004). Defining Social Work for the 21st Century: The International Federation of Social Workers’ Revised Definition of Social Work. International Journal of Social Work, 47(3), 407–424.Google Scholar
  51. Haynes, K. (1998). The One Hundred-Year Debate: Social Reform versus Individual Treatment. Social Work, 43(6), 501–509.Google Scholar
  52. Healy, L. (2008). Exploring the History of Social Work as a Human Rights Profession. International Social Work, 51(6), 735–784.Google Scholar
  53. Henslin, J. (2014). Mastering Sociology. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  54. Hildebrand, D. (2005). Pragmatism, Neopragmatism, and Public Administration. Administration & Society, 37(3), 345–359.Google Scholar
  55. Hofstadter, R. (1963). The Progressive Movement: 1900–1915. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  56. Institute of Economics and Peace (IEP). (2016). Positive Peace Report: 2016. New York, NY: Institute of Economics and Peace.Google Scholar
  57. Johnson, A. (2004). Social Work is Standing on the Legacy of Jane Addams: But are We Sitting on the Sidelines? Social Work, 49, 319–322.Google Scholar
  58. Kam, P. K. (2012). Back to the ‘Social’ of Social Work: Reviving the Social Work Profession’s Contribution to the Promotion of Social Justice. International Social Work, 57(6), 723–740.Google Scholar
  59. Kasler, D. (1981). Methodological Problems of Sociological History of Early German Sociology. Paper presented at the Department of Education, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  60. Kendall, K. (2000). Social work Education: Its Origins in Europe. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.Google Scholar
  61. Kemp, S., & Brandwein, R. (2010). Feminisms and Social Work in the United States: An Intertwined History. Affila: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(4), 341–364.Google Scholar
  62. Knight, L. (2005). Citizen: Jane Addams and the Struggle for Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Lengermann, P., & Niebrugge-Brantley, J. (2002). Back to the Future: Settlement Sociology, 1885–1930. The American Sociologist, Fall, 5–20.Google Scholar
  64. Lorenz, W. (2014). Is History Repeating Itself? Reinventing Social Work’s Role in Ensuring Social Solidarity Under Conditions of Globalization. In E. R. Virokannas (Ed.), Social Change and Social Work: The Changing Societal Conditions of Social Work in Time and Place (pp. 15–30). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in Public Participation: Part 1-Local Government Perspectives. Public Administration, 79(1), 205–222.Google Scholar
  66. Marini, F. (1971). Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective. New York: Chandler.Google Scholar
  67. McDonald, I. B. (2010). The Bureau of Municipal Research and the Development of a Professional Public Service. Administration & Society, 42(7), 815–835.Google Scholar
  68. McLaughlin, A. M. (2002). Social Work’s Legacy: Irreconcilable Differences. Clinical Social Work Journal, 30(2), 187–198.Google Scholar
  69. Misztal, B. (2009). A Nobel Trinity: Jane Addams, Emily Greene Balch and Alva Myrdal. American Sociologist, 40, 332–353.Google Scholar
  70. Mosher, F. (1975). American Public Administration: Past, Present, Future. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  71. Moyer, I. (2003). Jane Addams: Pioneer in Criminology. Women & Criminology, 14(2/3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  72. Redford, E. (1969). Democracy in the Administrative State. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Ritzer, G. (2015). Introduction to Sociology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Roberts, A., & Brownell, P. (1999). A Century of Forensic Social Work: Bridging the Past to the Present. Social Work, 44(4), 359–368.Google Scholar
  75. Roseneil, S. (1995). The Coming of Age of Feminist Sociology: Some Issues of Practice and Theory for the Next Twenty Years. British Journal of Sociology, 46(2), 191–199.Google Scholar
  76. Sands, R., & Nuccio, K. (1992). Postmodern Feminist Theory and Social Work. Social Work, 37(6), 489–494.Google Scholar
  77. Schneiderhan, E. (2011). Pragmatism and Empirical Sociology: The Case of Jane Addams and Hull-House, 1889–1895. Theoretical Sociology, 40, 589–617.Google Scholar
  78. Shields, P. (1996). Pragmatism: Exploring Public Administration’s Policy Imprint. Administration & Society 28(3): 390–411.Google Scholar
  79. Shields, P. (1998). Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Science: A Tool for Public Administration. Research in Public Administration, 7(1), pp. 195–225.Google Scholar
  80. Shields, P. (2003). The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration. Administration & Society, 35(5), 510–538.Google Scholar
  81. Shields, P. (2006). Democracy and Social Ethics of Jane Addams. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 28(3), 418–443.Google Scholar
  82. Shields, P. (2008). Rediscovering the Taproot: Is Classical Pragmatism the Route to Renew Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 28(3), 418–443.Google Scholar
  83. Shields, P. (2016). Building the Fabric of Peace: Jane Addams and Peacekeeping. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 7(3), 21–33.Google Scholar
  84. Shields, P., & Rangarajan, N. (2011). Public Service Professionals: The Legacy of Florence Nightingale, Mary Livermore and Jane Addams. In D. Menzel, & H. White (Eds.), The State of Public Administration: Issues, Challenges and Opportunity (pp. 36–53). New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  85. Shields, P., & Rissler, G. (2016). Positive Peace: Exploring its Roots and Potential for Public Administration.. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 7(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  86. Shields, P. & Soeters, J. (2013). Pragmatism, Peacekeeping and the Constabulary Force. In S. Ralston (Ed.), Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations (pp. 87–110). New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  87. Shields, P., & Soeters, J. (Forthcoming). Peaceweaving Jane Addams, Positive Peace and Public Administration. American Review of Public Administration. Publication before print http://arp.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/06/17/0275074015589629.abstract.
  88. Shields, P., Whetsell, T., & Hanks, E. (2013). Pragmatism and Public Administration: Looking Back, Looking Forward. In N. Rummens, & M. Kelemem (Eds.), American Pragmatism and Organizational Studies: Researching Management Practices (pp. 115–130). Bristol: Grover Press.Google Scholar
  89. Simon, H. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  90. Skidmore, R. A. (1995). Social Work Administration: Dynamic Management and Human Relationships. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  91. Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Small, A. (1896). Scholarship and Social Agitation. American Journal of Sociology, 1(5), 564–582.Google Scholar
  93. Specht, H., & Courtney, M. (1994). Unfaithful Angels: How Social Work Has Abandoned its Mission. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  94. Staniforth, B., Fouche, C., & O’Brien, M. (2011). Still Doing What We Do: Defining Social Work in the 21st Century. Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 191–208.Google Scholar
  95. Stillman, R. (1998). Creating the Administrative State: The Moral Reformers and the Modern Administrative World They Made. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  96. Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau Men Settlement Women: Constructing Public Administration in the Progressive Era. Lawerence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  97. Stivers, C. (2009). A Civic Machinery for Democratic Expression: Jane Addams on Public Administration. In M. Fischer, C. Nackenoff, & W. Chielewski (Eds.), Jane Addams and the Practice of Democracy (pp. 87–97). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  98. Stivers, C. (2016). Jane Addams. In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 3rd edition (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  99. Stolcis, G. (2004). A View from the Trenches: Comments on Miller’s ‘Why Old Pragmatism Needs and Upgrade’. Administration & Society, 36(3), 362–369.Google Scholar
  100. Trevino, A. J. (2012). The Challenge of Service Sociology. Social Problems, 59(1), 2–20.Google Scholar
  101. Whetsell, T. (2013). Theory Pluralism in Public Administration: Epistemology, Legitimacy and Method. American Review of Public Administration, 43(5), 602–618.Google Scholar
  102. White, V. (2006). The State of Feminist Social Work. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. White, W. A. (1963). Bossism and Political Reform. In R. Hofstadter (Ed.), The Progressive Movement 1900–1915 (pp. 104–107). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  104. Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations