Skip to main content

Myth 4: Deregulation Always Improves the Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
America's Free Market Myths
  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

Myth: Deregulation always improves the economy’s efficiency. Industries protected from competition, from the need to innovate and reduce costs would have to deal with the uncompromising realities of the market – the true test of efficiency. Deregulation represents a move toward free markets. It spurs the economy and raises productivity and eventually living standards.

Reality: Deregulation does not necessarily improve the economy. Often the motive behind deregulation is greater profitability yet not from reduced costs, innovation or more competition but rather from market power or rent seeking activities. Economic deregulation did not lead to an economic boom; it worked in some industries but in others a competitive outcome did not materialize. Financial deregulation turned out to be a disaster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thomas Friedman (2000).

  2. 2.

    Orbach (2012).

  3. 3.

    Orbach (2012).

  4. 4.

    Colin Camerer et al. (2003).

  5. 5.

    Polyani (2001).

  6. 6.

    Stiglitz (2001).

  7. 7.

    Backhouse and Medema (2009).

  8. 8.

    Shepherd (1991).

  9. 9.

    Perelman (2007).

  10. 10.

    See also Madrick (2009).

  11. 11.

    Kuttner (2007).

  12. 12.

    Madrick (2009).

  13. 13.

    Carlton and Perloff (2000).

  14. 14.

    Winston (1993).

  15. 15.

    Perelman (2007).

  16. 16.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  17. 17.

    Greer (1993).

  18. 18.

    Greer (1993).

  19. 19.

    Kahn (1971).

  20. 20.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  21. 21.

    Johnston (2006).

  22. 22.

    Johnston (2006).

  23. 23.

    Kuttner (2007).

  24. 24.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  25. 25.

    Leverage – using debt to buy assets.

  26. 26.

    Stiglitz (2010) and Krugman (2012a).

  27. 27.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  28. 28.

    Derivatives – securities or contracts that derive their value from an underlying asset.

  29. 29.

    The shadow banking system – nonregulated financial intermediaries involved in credit creation worldwide.

  30. 30.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  31. 31.

    Cassidy (2009).

  32. 32.

    Madrick (2009).

  33. 33.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  34. 34.

    Kuttner (2007).

  35. 35.

    Kuttner (2007).

  36. 36.

    Mortgage backed securities – bonds backed by mortgage loans.

  37. 37.

    Subprime mortgage – mortgage loans offered to people with low credit rating.

  38. 38.

    Cassidy (2009).

  39. 39.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  40. 40.

    Mirowski (2013) offers an explanation based on the symbiotic nature of the relationship between the Fed and economists.

  41. 41.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  42. 42.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  43. 43.

    Madrick (2009).

  44. 44.

    Madrick (2009).

  45. 45.

    Kuttner (2007.

  46. 46.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  47. 47.

    Pereleman (2007).

  48. 48.

    Madrick (2009).

  49. 49.

    Akerlof and Romer (1993).

  50. 50.

    Dayen (2016).

  51. 51.

    Cohan (2013).

  52. 52.

    Perelman (2007).

  53. 53.

    Crouch (2011).

  54. 54.

    Crouch (2011).

  55. 55.

    Kuttner (2007) and Cassidy (2009).

  56. 56.

    Madrick (2009).

  57. 57.

    Kuttner (2007).

  58. 58.

    Madrick (2009).

  59. 59.

    Stiglitz (2012).

  60. 60.

    Kuttner (2007).

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, George A. and Paul M. Romer (1993) “Looting: The Economic Underworld of Bankruptcy for Profit,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 2 [pp. 1–73].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse, Roger E. and Steven G. Medema (2009) “Laissez Faire, Economists and,” in New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (second edition), eds. Lawrence E. Blume and Steven N. Durlauf, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, Dennis W. and Jeffrey M. Perloff (2000) Modern Industrial Organization, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohan, William D. (2013) “Swap Votes is Another Big Win for the Big Banks,” Bloomberg (May 21). http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2013-05-21/swaps-vote-is-another-big-win-for-the-big-banks.

  • Colin, Camerer et al. (2003) “Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for Asymmetric Paternalism,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 151 [pp. 1211–1254]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin (2011) The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberalism, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayen, David (2016) “Why Is Elizabeth Warren on the Warpath This Week,” New Republic (February 26). https://newrepublic.com/article/130537/elizabeth-warren-warpath-week.

  • Friedman, Thomas (2000) The Lexus and the Olive Tree, New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, Douglas F. (1993) Government, Business and Society (third edition), New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Simon and James Kwak (2010) 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown, New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, David Cay (2006) “Flaws Seen in Markets for Utilities,” New York Times (November 21). http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/21/business/21utility.html?ref=business&_r=0&mtrref=undefined&gwh=F4DBFEE12EF4D9B966DD307765.

  • Kahn, Alfred E. (1971) The Economics of Regulation, Vol. 2, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul (2012a) “Why We Regulate,” New York Times (May 13). http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/14/opinion/krugman-why-we-regulate.html?.

  • Kuttner, Robert (2007) The Squandering of America: How the Failure of Our Politics Undermines Our Prosperity, New York: Vintage. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrick, Jeff (2009) The Case for Big Government, New Jersey: Princeton Press. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip (2013) Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown, London: Verso Books. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, Casey B. (2009) “Aggregate Implications of Labor Market Distortions: The Recession of 2008-9 and Beyond,” NBER Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, Barak (2012) “What Is Regulation?” Yale Journal on Regulation Online, Vol. 30 (September 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Michael (2007) The Confiscation of American Prosperity: From Right Wing Extremism and Economic Ideology to the Next Great Depression, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polyani, Karl (2001) The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, William G. (1991) Public Policies Toward Business, Illinois: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Yves (2010) ECONned: How Unenlightened Self-Interest Undermined Democracy and Corrupted Capitalism, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. (1971) “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 2 (Spring) [pp. 3–21].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2001) Foreword in The Great Transformation, by Karl Polyani, Boston: Beacon Press. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2010) Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2012) The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Clifford (1993) “Economic Deregulation: Days of Reckoning for Microeconomists,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 31 (September) [pp. 1263–1289].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaanan, J. (2017). Myth 4: Deregulation Always Improves the Economy. In: America's Free Market Myths. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50636-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50636-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50635-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50636-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics