Skip to main content

Myth 13: The Bailouts’ Purpose Was to Save the Free Market Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 576 Accesses

Abstract

Myth: The government could not allow liquidity to dry up, credit markets to stop functioning and giant banks to fail. Government had to act. The bailouts were a justifiable response to market failure and systemic risk. They were successful because the economy did not collapse and the financial sector remained viable without the dreaded government takeover. Bailouts were necessary to save the free market economy.

Reality: One important objective of the bailouts was to rescue large speculating financial institutions, their managers and creditors. Most democracies would have chosen temporary government ownership and changed management. The latter plan would have saved the financial system without risking trillions of dollars in taxpayer money and without protecting and rewarding management for failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nationalization – government takeover of a private business.

  2. 2.

    Brewer and Jagtiani (2013) suggest that banks may have spent about $15 billion in added premiums in eight mergers to attain the threshold level for the designation of “too big to fail”.

  3. 3.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  4. 4.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  5. 5.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  6. 6.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  7. 7.

    Krugman (2014a) writes that the Dodd-Frank reform bill, which gives the Treasury Department resolution authority, will permit government to place too big to fail banks in receivership without bailing out the bankers in future crises.

  8. 8.

    Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) – a government program to purchase “troubled assets” and equity from financial institutions during the Crash. Congress authorized the use of up to $700 billion.

  9. 9.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  10. 10.

    Cassidy (2009).

  11. 11.

    Madrick (2011).

  12. 12.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  13. 13.

    Cassidy (2009).

  14. 14.

    Johnson and Kwak (2010).

  15. 15.

    Cassidy (2009).

  16. 16.

    Y. Smith (2010).

  17. 17.

    Adams and Brock (1986).

  18. 18.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  19. 19.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  20. 20.

    Shaanan (2010).

  21. 21.

    Taibbi (2011).

  22. 22.

    Mirowski (2013).

  23. 23.

    Write down-reducing the book value of an asset because of a market change.

  24. 24.

    Mirowski (2013).

  25. 25.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  26. 26.

    Shaanan (2010).

  27. 27.

    Sloan (2008).

  28. 28.

    Macey (2008).

  29. 29.

    Shaanan (2010).

  30. 30.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  31. 31.

    Mirowski (2013) makes a similar point.

  32. 32.

    Blau et al. (2013) find that firms that had lobbied or had other types of political connections were more likely to receive TARP money and earlier than politically unconnected firms that did not engage in lobbying.

  33. 33.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  34. 34.

    Madrick (2011).

  35. 35.

    Stiglitz (2010).

  36. 36.

    Shaanan (2010).

  37. 37.

    Shaanan (2010).

  38. 38.

    Krugman (2015a).

Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaanan, J. (2017). Myth 13: The Bailouts’ Purpose Was to Save the Free Market Economy. In: America's Free Market Myths. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50636-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50636-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50635-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50636-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics