Abstract
Over the last several decades the scientific world has seen an unprecedented growth in new knowledge, accompanied by an explosive growth in scholarly literature published in a rising number of journals. Conventional wisdom tells us that the new knowledge is built on top of current knowledge, which in turn traces its origins to older knowledge. However, this linear view of knowledge growth, studied typically with citation analysis, may not be universal. Many of us have heard or known of a significant scientific idea that was not recognized at the time it was discovered/invented and published; rather it lays dormant for an unspecified period of time till it was rediscovered much later for its contribution in the creation of valuable new knowledge. Such scholarly work with delayed recognition has been euphemistically referred to as “sleeping beauties” that were discovered by “waking princes” (new scholarly work).
In this paper, we propose to study whether the field of regional science/economics has these so-called “sleeping beauties”; who, why and how long they laid in deep sleep; when and where they were rediscovered by “waking princes”: in brief, the dynamics behind the existence and delayed recognition of dormant but influential knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
When a network consists of just one type of node and edges connecting these nodes, then such a network is referred to as a uni-modal network. If a network consists of two types of nodes, then it is referred to bi-modal or multi-modal network. Depending on whether edges connecting nodes have directions or a combination of directional and non-directional edges, the network would be called as having directional and mixed directional connectivity respectively.
References
Anne-Wil H (2016) Google Scholar as a new data source for citation analysis. http://www.harzing.com/publications/white-papers/google-scholar-a-new-data-source-for-citation-analysis. Accessed 3 June 2016
Bomann L, Mutz R (2014) Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4578. Accessed 3 June 2016
Chen C (2015) How to use CiteSpace. https://leanpub.com/howtousecitespace
CHORUS (2013) Clearinghouse for the open research of the United States. http://publishers.org/news/publishers-introduce-chorus. Accessed 31 May 2016
Competitiveness Council (2016) Research and innovation: open science. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/compet/2016/05/st09357_en16_pdf/ence. Accessed 31 May 2016
Crassey D (2015) http://www.nature.com/news/sleeping-beauty-papers-slumber-for-decades-1.17615
SSRN (2016) https://www.ssrn.com. Accessed 3 June 2016
Garfield E (1970) Would Mendel’s work have been ignored if the ‘Science citation index’ was available 100 years ago? Curr Contents 2:69–70
Garfiled E (1980) Premature discovery or delayed recognition available via essays of an information scientist. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/delayedrecognition.html. Accessed 3 June 2016
Google Scholar (2016) https://scholar.google.com/. Accessed 3 June 2016
Ke Q, Ferrara E, Radicchi F, Flammini A (2015) Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 112(24):7426–7431. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/pnas.1424329112. Accessed 3 June 2016
Kleinberg J (2002) Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/bhs.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2016
Larivière V, Gingras Y (2015) The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0809/0809.5250.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2016
OSTP Memo (2013) Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2016
Price DDS (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J Am Soc Inf Sci 27:292–306. doi:10.1002/asi.4630270505
Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C (2010) Altmetrics: a manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto. Accessed 31 May 2016
Remler D (2014) Are 90% of academic papers really never cited? Reviewing the literature on academic citations, London School of Economics. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/04/23/academic-papers-citation-rates-remler/. Accessed 4 June 2016
Science (2016) http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/dramatic-statement-european-leaders-call-immediate-open-access-all-scientific-papers. Accessed 31 May 2016
Thompson Reuter’s Web of Science (2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Science. Accessed 17 July 2015
U.S. Agencies Public Access Plans Details (2016) http://www.chorusaccess.org/resources/us-agency-public-access-plans-details/. Accessed 31 May 2016
van Raan AFJ (2004) Sleeping Beauties in Science. Scientometrics 59(3):461–466
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our special thanks to GMU’s Office of Research Computing (orc.gmu.edu) for computational resources to conduct largescale network analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kulkarni, R., Stough, R.R. (2017). Identifying Sleeping Beauties in the Lore of Regional Science. In: Jackson, R., Schaeffer, P. (eds) Regional Research Frontiers - Vol. 1. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50547-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50547-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50546-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50547-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)