Skip to main content

Integrated In Situ Investigations for the Restoration: The Case of Regio VIII in Pompeii

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sensing the Past

Abstract

This chapter presents the study case of the integration of noninvasive in situ investigation methods able to provide information useful to survey and characterize the state of decay of some masonry walls and frescoes in two blocks (insulae) of the Regio VIII in Pompeii. The integrated investigations demonstrated the complementarity of ground-penetrating radar (GPR), seismic tomography, and infrared thermography (IRT) for the diagnosis of the state of conservation and the restoration of structures and surfaces of archaeological monuments. The investigation was very useful in planning the restoration work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The evolution of Pompeian painting is distinguished in four periods, each one characterized by a distinct style by the German archaeologist August Mau (1900). The first style, known also as an encrustation or masonry style, dominated a period between 200 BC and 80 BC. It is characterized by the simulation of some materials such as marble and architectural elements such as wooden beams, white cornices and pillars, and the use of vivid colors. The second style, also referred to as illusionism or the architectural style, was most popular in the first century BCE. It is characterized by the use of trompe l’oeil compositions to create the optical illusion of three-dimensional objects, architectural elements, and landscapes. The third style, or ornate style, was popular in the last two decades of the first century BCE. It developed as a reaction against the austerity of the second style. Fourth-style paintings depict large-scale narrative scenes and panoramic views.

  2. 2.

    The petrographic analyses have been conducted by Giovanni Quarta and Davide Melica of CNR-IBAM.

  3. 3.

    The Kirchhoff two-dimensional (2D)–velocity migration is done in the xt range, which means that a weighted summation for each point of the profile over a calculated hyperbola of preset bandwidth is performed. The GPR data processing was performed used GPR-slice software (Goodman 2013).

References

  • Avdelidis NP, Moropoulou A (2004) Applications of infrared thermography for the investigation of historic structures. J Cult Herit 5:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binda L, Saisi A, Zanzi L (2003) Sonic tomography and flat jack tests as complementary investigation procedures for the stone pillars of the temple of S.Nicolo’ L’Arena (Italy). NDT & E Int 36:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binda L, Zanzi L, Lualdi M, Condoleo P (2005) The use of georadar to assess damage to a masonry Bell Tower in Cremona, Italy. NDT & E Int 38(3):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandi C (1963) Teoria del restauro di Cesare Brandi. Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardarelli E, Godio A, Morelli G, Sambuelli L, Santarato G, Socco LV (2002) Integrated geophysical surveys to investigate the Scarsella vault of St. John’s Baptistery in Florence. Lead Edge 67:467–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlomagno GM, Di Maio R, Fedi M, Meola C (2011) Integration of infrared thermography and high-frequency electromagnetic methods in archaeological surveys. J. Geophys. Eng 8(2011):S93–S105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cataldo R, De Donno A, De Nunzio G, Leucci G, Nuzzo L, Siviero S (2005) Integrated methods for analysis of deterioration of cultural heritage: the Crypt of “Cattedrale di Otranto”. J Cult Herit 6:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (2004) Ground-penetrating Radar for archaeology. AltaMira, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (2012) Interpreting ground-penetrating Radar for archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB, Goodman D (1997) Ground-penetrating Radar: an introduction for archaeologists. AltaMira, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino PL, Capizzi P, Fiandaca G, Martorana R, Messina P (2009) Advances in micro geophysics for engineering and cultural heritage. J Earth Sci 20:626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aranno PJV et al (2015) High-resolution geomatic and geophysical techniques integrated with chemical analyses for the characterization of a Roman wall. J Cult Herit. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2015.06.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Danese M, Demšar U, Masini N, Charlton M (2010) Investigating material decay of historic buildings using visual analytics with multi-temporal infrared thermographic data. Archaeometry 52(3):482–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumoulin J (2016) Infrared thermography: from sensing principle to non destructive testing considerations. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorelli G (1875) Descrizione di Pompei. Tipografia Italiana, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabellone F, Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R, Quarta G, Grasso F (2013) Non-destructive prospecting and virtual reconstruction of the chapel of the Holy Spirit in Lecce, Italy. Near Surf Geophys. doi:10.3997/1873-0604.2012030

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia L (2006) Danni di guerra a Pompei. Una dolorosa vicenda quasi dimenticata, Studi della Soprintendenza Archeologica di Pompei 15. “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D (2013) GPR Slice Version 7.0 Manual. http://www.gpr-survey.com. Accessed 28 Jan 2017

  • Grinzato EP, Bison G, Marinetti S (2002a) Monitoring of ancient buildings by the thermal method. J Cult Herit 3(2002):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinzato EP, Bressan C, Marinetti S, Bison PG, Bonacina C (2002b) Monitoring of the Scrovegni Chapel by IR thermography: Giotto at infrared. Infrared Phys Technol 43(3–5):165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS (2003) ICOMOS Charter- principles for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage. Ratified by the ICOMOS 14th General Assembly, in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki T, Ishii T, Iwamoto T (1999) On the NDT and E for the diagnosis of defects using infrared thermography. NDT&E Int 32:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioppolo G (ed) (1992) Le Terme del Sarno a Pompei. Iter di un’analisi per la conoscenza, il restauro e la protezione sismica del monumento, Soprintendenza Archeologica di Pompei. Monografie 5. “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Koloski Ostrow A (1990) The Sarno Bath Complex. “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordatos EZ, Exharcos DA, Stavrakos C, Moropoulou A, Matikas TE (2013) Infrared thermographic inspection of murals and characterization of degradation in historic monuments. Constr Build Mater 48:1261–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leucci G (2016) Seismic and Sonic Applications on artifacts and historical building. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R, Soldovieri F (2011) GPR and sonic tomography for structural restoration: the case of the cathedral of Tricarico. J Geophys Eng 8(3):76–92. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/8/3/S08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R, Quarta G, Dolce C (2012) A multidisciplinary analysis of the crypt of the holy spirit in monopoli (Southern Italy). Near Surf Geophys 10:1–8. doi:10.3997/1873-0604.2011032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leucci G, Persico R, Soldovieri F (2007) Detection of fractures from GPR data: the case history of the Cathedral of Otranto. J Geophys Eng 4:452–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maierhofer C, Leipold S (2001) Radar investigation of masonry structures. NDT & E Int 34:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maierhofer C et al (2003) Detection of shallow voids in concrete structures with impulse thermography and radar. NDT&E Int 36:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Nuzzo L, Rizzo E (2007) GPR investigations for the study and the restoration of the Rose Window of Troia Cathedral (Southern Italy). Near Surf Geophys 5:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Persico R, Rizzo E (2010a) Some examples of GPR prospecting for monitoring of the monumental heritage. J Geophys Eng 7:190–199. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/7/2/S05

  • Masini N, Persico R, Rizzo E, Calia A, Giannotta MT, Quarta G, Pagliuca A (2010b) Integrated techniques for analysis and monitoring of historical monuments: the case of S. Giovanni al Sepolcro in Brindisi (Southern Italy). Near Surf Geophys 8(5):423–432. doi:10.3997/1873-0604.2010012

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Gabellone F, Leucci G, Persico R, Soldovieri F (2013) Enhancement of the information content available from non invasive diagnostics for restoration and knowledge of architectural heritage. In: Proceedings of Built heritage 2013 monitoring conservation management, Milano, 18–20 Nov 2013, pp 824–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau A (1900) Pompeji in Leben und Kunst. Engelmann, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier T, Aura M, Fehr M, Köhn D, Cristiano L, Sobott R, Mosca I, Ettl H, Eckel F, Steinkraus T, Erkul E, Schulte-Kortnack D, Sigloch K, Bilgili F, Di Gioia E, Parisi Presicce C (2016) Chapter XX: Investigating surficial alterations of natural stone by ultrasonic surface measurements. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past. Geoscience and sensing technologies for cultural heritage. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Moropoulou A, Labropoulos K, Delegou E, Bakolas A (2013) Non-destructive techniques as a tool for the protection of built cultural heritage. Constr Build Mater 48:1222–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo L, Masini N, Rizzo E, Lasaponara R (2007) Integrated and multiscale NDT for the study of architectural heritage. In: Michel U, Civco DL, Ehlers M, Kaufmann HJ (eds) Proceedings of SPIE, remote sensing for environmental monitoring, GIS applications, and geology VIII, vol. 7110, p 711015

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo L, Calia A, Liberatore D, Masini N, Rizzo E (2010) Integration of ground-penetrating radar, ultrasonic tests and infrared thermography for the analysis of a precious medieval rose window. Adv Geosci 24:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Gracia V, Caselles JO, Clapés J, Martinez G, Osorio R (2013) Non-destructive analysis in cultural heritage buildings: evaluating the Mallorca cathedral supporting structures. NDT & E Int 59:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Gracia V, González-Drigo R, Di Capua D (2008) Horizontal resolution in a non-destructive shallow GPR survey: an experimental evaluation. NDT&E Int 41:611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persico R (2014) Introduction to ground penetrating radar: inverse scattering and data processing. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN:9781118305003

    Google Scholar 

  • Persico R, Sato M (2016) Ground penetrating radar: technologies and data processing issue for applications in the field of cultural heritage. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Persico R, Soldovieri F (2008) Effects of the background removal in linear inverse scattering. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 46(4):1104–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli D, Scozzafava M, Tallini M (2004) Ground penetrating radar investigations for the restoration of historic buildings: the case study of the Collemaggio Basilica (L’Aquila, Italy). J Cult Herit 5:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JK, Stasiuk MV (1997) Characterization of volcanic deposits with ground-penetrating radar. Bull Volcanol 58(7):515–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saisi A, Gentile C, Guidobaldi M (2015) Post-earthquake continuos dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua, Italy. Constr Build Mater 81:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldovieri F, Orlando L (2009) Novel tomographic based approach and processing strategies for GPR measurements using multifrequency antennas. J Cult Herit 10:e83–e92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present publication is based on the results of non invasive investigations performed in 2015 by CNR_IBAM, funded by Samoa srl, for the restoration of Regio VIII.

Author Contributions

N. Masini conceived the study. N. Masini and M. Sileo wrote the paper, with the contribution of G. Leucci for paragraphs 29.3.2. 29.3.3 and 29.4.2, and A. D’Antonio for the study area (paragraph 29.2). F. Soldovieri reviewed the manuscript. GPR and seismic data have been acquired by G. Leucci, L. De Giorgi and M. Sileo. Leucci and Sileo processed GPR data. Seismic data have been processed by Leucci. Infrared data have been acquired and processed by M. Sileo. The terrestrial surveys has been performed by M. Scavone, A. Pecci and A. D’Antonio, the UAV-based surveys has been made by A. Pecci. The interpretation of data has been done by N. Masini, G. Leucci, M. Scavone, M. Sileo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Masini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Masini, N. et al. (2017). Integrated In Situ Investigations for the Restoration: The Case of Regio VIII in Pompeii. In: Masini, N., Soldovieri, F. (eds) Sensing the Past. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics