Advertisement

From Social Practices to Reflective Agency: A Postsecular Ethics of Citizenship

Chapter

Abstract

In this essay I offer a normative account of citizenship based on the analysis of our condition as co-practitioners in civil society, an account that aims to address the public role of religions and to embrace multiple forms of citizenship. Under conditions of pluralism, one’s involvement in cooperative practices is shaped and unsettled by the presence of co-practitioners who carry different self-understandings about the relationship between their beliefs and their social agency. Social cooperation is threatened when these self-understandings come into conflict. The notion of postsecularism provides a valuable clue for better understanding this kind of conflict, thanks to its focus on how the self-understanding of religious and secular actors is affected by their co-implication in the same public space. Within this framework, I suggest that a reflective consideration of the practical cooperative relationships that ordinarily characterize our agency as actors within civil society may adequately ground a normative ethics of citizenship. This reflective awareness affects the self-understanding of both religious and secular citizens, and normatively points towards a disposition to cooperatively re-arrange and re-formulate one’s own beliefs and arguments in light of the structural co-implication of one’s own belief with the beliefs of others. The basic duties of citizenship emerge from the implications of participating in a body of social practices that extends to different communities of practice at a local, national and global level.

Keywords

Ethics of citizenship Social practices Civil society Postsecularism Reflective agency 

References

  1. Audi, R. (2001). The architecture of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, C. (2004) Media, democracy and representation: Disembodying the public, in C. Barnett–M. Low (ed.), Spaces of democracy: Geographical perspectives on citizenship, participation and representation, London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. (1999). The desecularization of the world. A global overview. Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. (2010). Between relativism and fundamentalism. In P. Berger (Ed.), Between relativism and fundamentalism: Religious resources for a middle position. Eerdmans: Grand Rapids.Google Scholar
  5. Calhoun, C., Juergensmeyer, M., & VanAntwerpen, J. (Eds.). (2011). Rethinking secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casanova, J. (2006). Religion, European secular identities, and European integration. In T. Byrnes & P. Katzenstein (Eds.), Religion in an expanding Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castiglione, D., & Warren, M. E. (2006). Rethinking democratic representation: Eight theoretical issues. Prepared for delivery to “Rethinking Democratic Representation. Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions University of British Columbia, 18–19 May, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Clanton, J. C. (2008). Religion and democratic citizenship: Inquiry and conviction in the American public square. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Danis, M., Biddle, A. K., & Goold, S. D. (2004). Enrollees choose priorities for medicare. The Gerontologist, 44(1), 58–67.Google Scholar
  12. Danis, M., Binnendijk, E., Vellakkal, S., Ost, A., Koren, R., & Dror, D. M. (2007). Eliciting health insurance benefit choices of low income groups. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(32), 3331–3339.Google Scholar
  13. Danis, M., Ginsburg, M., & Goold, S. (2010). Experience in the United States with public deliberation about health insurance benefits using the small group decision exercise, CHAT. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 33(3), 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorski, P. S., Kyuman Kim, D., Torpey, J., & VanAntwerpen, J. (Eds.). (2012). The postsecular in question. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (2008). ‘Prepolitical foundations of the constitutional state?’ in between naturalism and religion (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, D. (2005). On secularization: Towards a revised general theory. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Monti, P. (2012). On the rationality of social practices. In F. Botturi (Ed.), Understanding human experience: Reason and faith (pp. 103–120). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. Nynäs, P., Lassander, M., & Utriainen, T. (Eds.). (2012). Post-secular society. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Raz, J. (2003). The practice of value. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rorty, R. (2003). Religion in the public square: A reconsideration. Journal of Religious Ethics, 31(1), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salvatore, A. (2010). The public sphere: Liberal modernity Catholicism, Islam. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  25. Saward, M. (2005). Governance and the transformation of political representation. In J. Newman (Ed.), Remaking governance: People, politics and the public sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgenstenian approach to human activity and the social. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stout, J. (2003). Democracy and tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Szakolczai, A. (2013). Comedy and the public sphere. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Talisse, R. (2009). Democracy and moral conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Theobald, C. (2007). Le Christianisme comme style (Vol. I–II). Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  33. Tuomela, R. (2002). The philosophy of social practice: A collective acceptance view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolterstorff, N. (2012). In T. Cuneo (Ed.), Understanding liberal democracy: Essays in political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations