Abstract
Providing high quality learning experiences outside the classroom requires professional educators and educational programme designers to continuously improve their knowledge, skills and attitudes toward teaching and learning. This chapter describes long-term professional development courses designed and implemented by botanic gardens across Europe. The programmes were established as part of a project funded by the European Union (INQUIRE). They were designed to encourage school teachers and botanic garden educators to establish interdisciplinary learning communities . The participants in the course were asked to make their tacit knowledge more explicit, share it and adopt positive attitudes towards theory-based instruction as well as use reflective practice as tools for improving their educational programmes. Learning in a collaborative network is a special mode of knowledge production which values knowledge that is embedded in social structures within and between individuals. To gain more insight into these structures and eventually use this knowledge to scaffold the social process most effectively, Social Network Analysis was used. This approach enables the course instructor to identify particular individuals in the group who are recognised as ‘hubs’ and ‘authorities’ by others and therefore impact the whole community. The process of making social interactions visible may help to improve professional development offers in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker-Doyle, K. J., & Yoon, S. A. (2011). In search of practitioner-based social capital: A social network analysis tool for understanding and facilitating teacher collaboration in a US-based STEM professional development program. Professional development in Education, 37(1), 75–93.
Barton, D. P., & Tusting, K. (2005). Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (Learning in doing). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Booth, W., Cuzyova, A., Keys, P., Macauley, J., & Murison, S. (2004). Establishing a Community of Practice. A Resource Handbook, Draft for Discussion. UNDP/Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States (ECIS). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/nOlA9h.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Managment, 29(6), 991–1013.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social network. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Burt, R. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526.
Carolan, B. V. (2013). Social network analysis and education: theory, methods & applications. SAGE publications, Inc.
Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). district policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235. doi:10.3102/0162373708321829.
Coburn, C. E., Mata, W. S., & Choi, L. (2013). The embeddedness of teachers’ social networks: Evidence from a study of mathematics reform. Sociology of Education, 86(4), 311–342. doi:10.1177/0038040713501147.
Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 200–218.
Dillon, J. (2012). Panacea or passing fad—good is IBSE? Roots, 9(2), 5–9.
Grafendorfer, A., & Neureiter, H. (2009). Unterricht in Naturwissenschaften. In C. Schreiner, & U. Schwantner (Eds.), PISA 2006. Österreichischer Expertenbericht zum Naturwissenschaftsschwerpunkt (pp. 20–31). Graz, Austria: Leykam.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105–130). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure. The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 485–510.
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. doi:10.2307/2667032.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, New York: Routledge.
Hennig, M., Brandes, U., Pfeffer, J., & Mergel, I. (2012). Studying social networks: A guide to empirical research. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
Herz, A. (2014). Forgotten and future connections between social network research and educational research. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(S5), 241–256. doi:10.1007/s11618-014-0550-1.
Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy a teacher‘s guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Huberman, M. (1993). Linking the practitioner and researcher communities for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(1), 1–16.
Jansen, D. (2006). Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse – Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Kleinberg, J. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604–632.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McPherson, J. M., Popielarz, P. A., Drobnic, S. (1992). Social networks and organizational dynamics. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 153–170. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096202.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.
Minner, D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter: Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949.
OECD (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies policy report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/30/36645825.pdf.
Penuel, W., Riel, M., Krause, A., & Frank, K. (2009). Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers’ College Record, 111(1), 124–163.
Phillips, M., Finkelstein, D., & Wever-Frerichs, S. (2007). School site to museum floor: How informal science institutions work with schools. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1489–1507.
Rehrl, M., & Gruber, H. (2007). Netzwerkanalysen in der Pädagogik. Ein Überblick über Methode und Anwendung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 53(2), 243–264.
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: Directorate General for Research, Science, Economy and Society.
Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Retrieved from http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Tran, L. U., & King, H. (2011). Teaching science in informal environments: Pedagogical knowledge for informal educators. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 279–293). Dordrecht: Springer.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). ‘Communities of Practice. Learning as a social system’, Systems Thinker. Retrieved from http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Egg, J., Kapelari, S., Dillon, J. (2017). Visualising Social Network Structures in the Training of Professional Learning Communities of Educators in Informal and Formal Settings. In: Patrick, P. (eds) Preparing Informal Science Educators. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50398-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50398-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50396-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50398-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)