Skip to main content

Are We Missing Something? How Can Cluster Policies Create the Conditions for Value Generation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

Abstract

This chapter summarises the recurring barriers identified and their impact on the vision of clusters as a focus for value creation. It underlines the crucial importance of more timely feedback on operating conditions on the ground, to better inform policies on emerging needs, challenges and opportunities that also impact on economic outcomes. This is presented as complementing the role of models dealing with the factors and condition in the market. The chapter highlights the economic advantages of better leveraging the distributed knowledge of stakeholders on the ground, and the potential for more pro-active involvement of Universities in mediating this, through collaborative and practice–based research on the ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson R, Audretsch D (2008) Economic doctrines and policy differences: has the Washington policy debate been asking the wrong questions? Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Washington DC. http://wwwitiforg/files/EconomicDoctrinepdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2016

  • Bar-Yam Y (2005) About engineering complex systems: multiscale analysis and evolutionary engineering. In: Brueckner S et al (eds) ESOA, LNCS 3464. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 16–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yam Y (2006) Engineering complex systems: multiscale analysis and evolutionary engineering. In: Braha D, Minai A, Bar-Yam Y (eds) Complex engineered systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate R (2006) Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing the services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 15(5):307–310 Available on http://wwwncbinlmnihgov/pmc/articles/PMC2565809/. Accessed 30 Dec 2015

  • Botsman R, Rogers R (2010) What’s mine is yours. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2005) The social structures of the economy. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero RJ (2010) Macroeconomics after the crisis: time to deal with the pretense-of-knowledge syndrome. MIT Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Rabeharisoa V (2003) The increasing involvement of concerned groups in R&D policies: what lessons for public powers? In: Geuna A, Salter AJ, Steinmueller WE (eds) Science and innovation: rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 30–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr W, Kemmis S (1986) Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Falmer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluster2Cluster website for the project www.cluster2cluster.org

  • Desmet D, Maerkedahl, Shi P (2017) Adopting an ecosystem view of business technology. Online Article, February 2017. Available on http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/adopting-an-ecosystem-view-of-business-technology?cid=reinventing-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1702. Accessed 17 Feb 2017

  • Farrell D, Goodman K (2013) Government by design: four principles for a better public sector. Article December 13, McKinsey Quarterly

    Google Scholar 

  • Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E (2015) Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2015) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol, AIST

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1945) The use of hnowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530. (September)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Renewable Energy Association (2015) REthinking energy report. Available on http://www.irena.org/rethinking/IRENA%20_REthinking_Energy_2nd_report_2015.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2016

  • Jaegersberg G, Ure J (2003) Inter-regional cluster strategies: enhancing the competitiveness of the German brazilian automotive supply chain. Virtual SC conference, 17–28 November, Cranfield University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegersberg G, Ure J (2005) Inter-regional cluster strategies: value-adding partnerships between government education and industry in the automotive supply chain, CE2005, July 2006, Dallas, USA (Best Session Paper). In: Sobolewski M, Ghodous P (eds) Next generation concurrent engineering: smart and concurrent integration of product data services and control strategies. Proceeding of the 12th international conference on concurrent engineering: research and applications ISPE. Omnipress pp 253–2594

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegersberg G, Ure J, Lloyd (2007) Trans-regional supply chain research network: developing innovation stategies within and between regional oil and gas clusters. In: Loureiro G, Curran R (eds) Complex systems concurrent engineering. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegersberg G, Ure J (2008) Creating value within and between European regions in the photovoltaic sector. In: Curran R, Chou S, Trappery A (eds) Collaborative product and service life cycle management for a sustainable world. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegersberg G, Ure J (2011) Barriers to knowledge sharing and stakeholder alignment in solar energy clusters: learning from other sectors and regions in the solar energy supply chain: learning form clusters in other regions. Journal of Strategic information Systems (JSIS) Joint-authorship

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WHA (2009) Intermediates in triple helix collaboration: the roles of 4th pillar organisations in public to private technology transfer. Int J Technol Transf Commer 8:142–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavadias S, Ladas K, Loch C (2016) The transformative business model. Harvard Business Review, October–December Issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketels C, Lindqvist G, S­lvell Ö (2012) The role of cluster organisations. The EU Cluster Observatory

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie D (2006) An engine not a camera: how financial models shape markets. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1919) Industry and trade. Macmillan, London, p 287

    Google Scholar 

  • Morioka S, Farrington S, Hoe P, Brett K (2013) The business case for people powered health. The innovation Unit, NESTA. Available on http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_business_case_for_people_powered_health.pdf. Accessed Oct 2016

  • Nakwa K, Zawdie G, Intarakumnerd P (2012) Role of intermediaries in accelerating the transformation of inter-firm networks into triple helix networks: a case study of SME-based industries in Thailand. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 52:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini D (2009) Medical innovation as a process of translation: a case from the field of telemedicine. Br J Manag 21(4):1011–1026

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Peng L (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. J Manag Stud 49(8):1484–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T (2013) Capital in the twenty first century. Editions du Seuil, Belknap Press. (English version printed in 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1998) On competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, p 225

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2008) The sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney M, Parikh D (2001) Where value lives in a networked world. Harv Bus Rev 79(1):79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermer M (2009) Telecare and self-management: opportunity to change the paradigm. J Med Ethics 35(11):688–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper and Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott BR (2011) Capitalism: its origins and evolution as a system of governance. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (2010) Honeybee democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (2012) The price of inequality. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Segel LA, Cohen IR (2001) Design principles for the immune system and other distributed autonomous systems. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott T, Williams AD (2007) Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything atlantic books. Atlantic Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure J (2011) Minimising risk and maximising value: informing research and service development in collaboration with users in eHealth and eBusiness. British Computer Society Health Information Systems Conference, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure J, Jaegersberg G (2005) Invisible architecture: the benefits of aligning people, processes and technology: sociotechnical case studies for system designers and managers. British Computer Society, Swindon

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure J, Malins J, Murray P, Juwah C (2001) Beyond constructivism: generative networked environments, ALT-C conference ‘Changing learning Environments’, September, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure J, Jaegersberg G, Lloyd AD, Procter R (2007) Integrating innovation in the regional and inter-regional oil and gas supply chain: case studies from a trans-regional research network. European Symposium on Innovation Management Practice (ERIMA), 15–16th March 2007, Bidart (Biarritz), France

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure J, Procter R, Lin Y, Hartswood M, Anderson S, Lloyd S, Wardlaw J, Gonzalez-Velez H, Ho K (2009) The development of data infrastructures in eHealth: a socio-technical perspective. J Assoc Inf Syst 10(5), Art 3:417–428. Available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol10/iss5/3. Accessed 30 April 2012

  • Von Hippel E (2004) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2010) The business model: theoretical roots, recent developments and future research. Working Paper, IESE business School, University of Navarra

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Policy dos and don’ts in a nutshell

Don’t

Do

How?

Don’t ignore what policy users know

Get feedback to ensure you know how policy is impacting on different groups, if it meets their needs, and what the operational barriers are on the ground-such as bureaucracy

Executive fora for policy co-production

Ongoing collaborative action research by Universities with companies

Don’t have policy which is short term, fragmented, uncoordinated

Provide long stability, predictability, consistency, and coordination in part through better integration with other long term economic goals and policies, and their implementation

Consider how renewable energy fits into wider energy & economic policies over the long term

Expedite coordination of standards, processes, permits, regulations, across regions

Coordination of renewables policy X Ministries.

Don’t expect communication and collaboration between cluster players without opportunities and incentives

Support and incentivise alliances between actors, to leverage disparate knowledge skills and resources more effectively for innovation

Map gaps, barriers or disincentives to communication or collaboration as part of collaborative action research with Universities

Provide mechanisms and incentives to bridge these gaps e.g. Share Fairs, mentoring, executive foraa

Don’t reinvent the wheel

Learn from other sectors and clusters and anticipate or mitigate unnecessary cost and risk

Cross cluster research and collaboration networks.

Awareness of barriers in other sectors

Don’t consider renewables policy in isolation from energy and economic policy, or as an ‘add-on’

Integrate renewables into longer term economic policy, as part of managed change to address long term goals in energy, the economy, employment, health and the environment.

Interdepartmental committee to look at coordination, potential synergies towards common goals e.g. data sharing, interoperability, incentives for shared aims.

Don’t concentrate on the knowledge and the needs of larger companies at the expense of SMEs

Provide opportunities to leverage what all stakeholders know, and Identify the very different needs of SMEs which are so central for innovation in the cluster, and employment in the region

Executive fora for policy co-production

Ongoing collaborative action research by Universities with smaller companies

Don’t look at innovation simply as the spinning out of pure research on materials in Universities,

Recognise that much of the innovation in renewables is about more practice –based, company-led innovationb by SMEs who typically find it hard to get R&D support, research facilities or funding for concept testing

Provide targeted funding and incentives for collaboration of SMEs and Universities on more practice-based company-led innovations

Provide research vouchers for SMEs

Address the issues of IP and publication which deter collaboration (See Chap. 11)

Don’t restrict access to research facilities to SMEs that can foster innovation and regional employment

Recognise that large companies have access to in-house and private labs as well as university facilities, while SMEs often don’t

See above

Use targeted funding to even the playing field

Matching large oil and small renewables SMEs

Don’t let lack of training and expertise constrain the growth of companies and the cluster

Identify and address the gaps in skills and knowledge in relation to emerging industries such as renewables as both (a) a constraint on access to trained staff (b) a barrier to informed policy

Incentivise Universities to focus some of their student internships on more collaborative and practice-based research with businesses (i) to identify gaps in skills and knowledge; (ii) to inform professional development & policy.

  1. aAs long as these are not just ‘talking shops’ Senior executive staff must be there
  2. bE.g. new renewable installations and constructions where the power, reliability, cost, lifetime, scale etc need multidisciplinary research support to be viable, as well as new products and applications

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaegersberg, G., Ure, J. (2017). Are We Missing Something? How Can Cluster Policies Create the Conditions for Value Generation?. In: Renewable Energy Clusters. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50365-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics