Skip to main content

The SENS-IS Assay

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Alternatives for Dermal Toxicity Testing
  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

We have developed SENS-IS, a method based on the quantitative analysis of specific biomarkers expressed in 3D reconstructed epidermis. The use of a reconstructed 3D human epidermis as the test system allows the testing of chemicals/ingredients under conditions close to the human use. Using this approach, the SENS-IS assay can also be used for the measurement of chemical sensitizing potency. The end point analysis measures the quantitative overexpression of a carefully selected set of 65 biomarkers regrouped into three subsets to take into account the irritation potential and the diversity of chemical induction of skin sensitization. The performance of the SENS-IS assay was evaluated here with a subset of 41 chemicals. Its hazard and potency predictivity as compared to the corresponding LLNA data were, respectively, of 97.5% and 90.2%. The reproducibility and predictivity of the SENS-IS assay have been evaluated during a ring study organized with three laboratories. The SENS-IS assay was shown to be robust and transferable and delivered results that compared very well with corresponding human sensitization data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Martin SF, Esser PR, Weber FC, Jakob T, Freudenberg MA, Schmidt M, Goebeler M. Mechanisms of chemical-induced innate immunity in allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy. 2011;66(9):1152–63. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02652.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nosbaum A, Vocanson M, Rozieres A, Hennino A, Nicolas J-F. Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2009;19(4):325–32. doi:10.1684/ejd.2009.0686.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Freudenberg MA, Esser PR, Jakob T, Galanos C, Martin SF. Innate and adaptive immune responses in contact dermatitis: analogy with infections. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2009;144(2):173–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreilhon C, Gras D, Hologne C, Bajolet O, Cottrez F, Magnone V, et al. Live Staphylococcus aureus and bacterial soluble factors induce different transcriptional responses in human airway cells. Physiol Genomics. 2005;20(3):244–55. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00135.2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ade N, Leon F, Pallardy M, Peiffer J-L, Kerdine-Romer S, Tissier M-H, et al. HMOX1 and NQO1 genes are upregulated in response to contact sensitizers in dendritic cells and THP-1 cell line: role of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway. Toxicol Sci. 2009;107(2):451–60. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotovio J, Grandidier M-H, Portes P, Roguet R, Rubinstenn G. The in vitro skin irritation of chemicals: optimisation of the EPISKIN prediction model within the framework of the ECVAM validation process. ATLA. 2005;33(4):329–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottrez F, Boitel E, Auriault C, Aeby P, Groux H. Genes specifically modulated in sensitized skins allow the detection of sensitizers in a reconstructed human skin model. Development of the SENS-IS assay. Toxicology in Vitro. 2015;29(4):787–802. ISSN 0887-2333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loveless SE, Api A-M, Crevel RWR, Debruyne E, Gamer A, Jowsey IR, et al. Potency values from the local lymph node assay: application to classification, labelling and risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;56(1):54–66. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cottrez F, Boitel E, Ourlin J-C, Peiffer J-L, Fabre I, Henaoui I-S, Mari B, Vallauri A, Paquet A, Barbry P, Auriault C, Aeby P, Groux H. SENS-IS, a 3D reconstituted epidermis based model for quantifying chemical sensitization potency: Reproducibility and predictivity results from an inter-laboratory study. Toxicology in Vitro. 2016;32:248–260. ISSN 0887-2333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basketter DA, Alépée N, Ashikaga T, Barroso J, Gilmour N, Goebel C, et al. Categorization of chemicals according to their relative human skin sensitizing potency. Dermatitis. 2014;25(1):11–21. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Basketter DA, Lea LJ, Cooper K, Stocks J, Dickens A, Pate I, et al. Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation. Food Chem Toxicol. 1999;37(12):1167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen A. Final report on the safety assessment of benzaldehyde. Int J Toxicol. 2006;25(Suppl 1):11–27. doi:10.1080/10915810600716612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. OECD (2014), The Adverse Outcome Pathway for Skin Sensitisation Initiated by Covalent Binding to Proteins, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264221444-en.

  14. Hewitt NJ, Edwards RJ, Fritsche E, Goebel C, Aeby P, Scheel J, et al. Use of human in vitro skin models for accurate and ethical risk assessment: metabolic considerations. Toxicol Sci. 2013;133(2):209–17. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kft080.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hervé Groux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cottrez, F., Boitel, E., Auriault, C., Groux, H. (2017). The SENS-IS Assay. In: Eskes, C., van Vliet, E., Maibach, H. (eds) Alternatives for Dermal Toxicity Testing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50353-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50353-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50351-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50353-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics