Abstract
There is an age-old distinction between dyadic and triadic sign models in semiotics. Most of dyadic sign models describe the relationship between the meaning and the carrier of that meaning (e.g. the relationship between content and form or signified and signifier ). A classical example of the dyadic sign model is the model of the linguistic unit introduced by Swiss linguist and semiotician Ferdinand de Saussure . Triadic sign models add a third component to the sign—an external referent in relation to which the sign has its meaning. In the semiotic tradition stemming from the works of Charles S. Peirce , this aspect of the sign is called the “object” and the triadic sign, correspondingly, consists in the relationship between the representamen , the object and the interpretant.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Cobley, P. (2010). The cultural implications of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 3(2), 225–244.
Maran, T. (2010a). An ecosemiotic approach to nature writing. PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature, 7, 79–87.
Ransdell, J. (1977). Some leading ideas in Peirce’s semiotic. Semiotica, 19, 157–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maran, T. (2017). Second Excursion: Importance of the Object. In: Mimicry and Meaning: Structure and Semiotics of Biological Mimicry. Biosemiotics, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50317-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50317-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50315-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50317-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)