Abstract
This chapter presents the basics of classical physical geodesy , starting from the definitions of the gravity potential and gravity. The normal gravity potential is derived as the potential of a level ellipsoid plus the rotational potential of the ellipsoid. Normal gravity , defined as the gradient of the normal gravity potential, is presented on and above the level ellipsoid. The basic concepts of the geoid, reference ellipsoid, disturbing potential and geoid height are defined, as well as the classical definitions of gravity anomaly and disturbing potential. After derivation of the fundamental equation of physical geodesy , the gravity field components of the disturbing potential, gravity anomaly and its radial derivative are presented in spherical harmonics, followed by Kaula ’s power rule of the geopotential harmonics. The classical integral formulas of Poisson , Stokes, Hotine , Vening Meinesz and the vertical gradient of gravity anomaly are derived by spherical harmonics. Other spherical integral formulas are derived for determining the gravity anomaly and/or disturbing potential from deflections of the vertical (inverse Vening Meinesz formula ) and gravity gradient components. The classical procedures in geoid determination, including direct and secondary indirect topographic effects and downward continuation of gravity and primary indirect topographic effect on the disturbing potential, are described. Finally, the chapter deals with common height systems, such as geopotential numbers, dynamic, orthometric and normal heights, as well as normal-orthometric heights. Some approximate formulas to correct normal-orthometric heights to orthometric or normal heights are also presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bois GP (1961) Tables of indefinite integrals. Dover Publications Inc., New York
Bruns H (1878) Die Figure der Erde. Publ. Preuss. Geod. Inst, Berlin
Ekman M (1989) Impacts of geodynamic phenomena on systems for height and gravity. Bull Geod 63:281–296
Gauss FW (1828) Bestimmung des Breitenunterschiedes zwischen den Sternwarten von Göttingen und Altona durch Beobachtungen am Ramsdenschen Zenithsector. Vanderschoeck und Ruprecht, Göttingen, pp 48–50
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
Heiskanen WA, Vening Meinesz FA (1958) The earth and its gravity field. McGraw-Hill Inc
Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy. U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C
Hwang C (1998) Inverse Vening Meinesz formula and deflection-geoid formula: applications to prediction of gravity and geoid over South China Sea. J Geod 72:304–312
Kaula WM (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell Publications, London
Martinec Z (1998) Boundary-value problems for gravimetric determination of a precise geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 73. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
Molodensky MS, Eremeev VF, Yurkina MI (1962) Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth. Trans from Russian by Israel Programme for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem
Moritz H (2000) Geodetic reference system 1980. J Geod 74:128–133
Pizzetti P (1911) Sopra il calcolo teorico delle deviazioni del geoide dall’ ellipsoide. Atti Accad Sci Torino 46:331
Sjöberg LE (2000) Topographic effects by the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid and quasigeoid determinations. J Geod 74(2):255–268
Sjöberg LE (2014) On the topographic effects by Stokes formula. J Geod Sci 4:130–135
Somagliana C (1929) Teoria generale del campo gravitazionale dell’ ellisoide di rotazione. Mem Soc Astron Ital, vol IV
Stokes GG (1849) On the variation of gravity on the surface of the earth. Trans Cambridge Phil Soc 8:672–695
Vening Meinesz FA (1928) A formula expressing the deflection of the plumb-line in the gravity anomalies and some formulae for the gravity field and the gravity potential outside the geoid. Proc Koninkl Ned Akad Wetenschap 31(3):315–331
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Closed-Form Kernels
Referring to Bois (1961), the following formulas can be derived for \( 0 \le s \le 1 \) when using the notations \( L(x) = \sqrt {\left( {1 - 2xt + x^{2} } \right)} \) and \( L(s) = L \):
and
Appendix 2: Solutions to Exercises
Solution to Exercise 3.0:
\( \Delta W = \Delta V + \Delta\overline{\Omega } = 2 {\omega} + \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {0} \\ { - 4}{\pi}{\rho} \\ \end{array} } \right\} \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} \rm{exterior\; of\; the\; Earth} \\ \rm{inside\; the\; Earth } \\ \end{array} } \right. \)
Solution to Exercise 3.1:
Let us introduce the notations g, a and \( g_{\Omega } \) for the magnitudes of gravity, gravitation and the centrifugal force. Then the maximum and minimum gravity are given at the poles and the Equator, respectively, with
and
As \( g_{\Omega } \left( \theta \right) = \left| {\frac{{\partial \overline{\Omega } }}{\partial r}} \right| = R\omega^{2} \sin^{2} \theta \), it follows with R = 6371 km and \( \omega \) according to Table 1.1, that:
Hence, gravity at the Equator is 339 mGal less than at the pole for a spherical, homogeneous Earth model. (For this model the difference is only due to the rotation of the model.)
Solution to Exercise 3.2:
The gravity, gravitation and centrifugal force vectors (with notations adopting those in the previous exercise) are illustrated in Fig. 3.4a. If the Earth stops rotating, vector \( \bar{g} \) will move to and be equal to vector \( \bar{a} \). From Fig. 3.4b, the sine theorem can be applied, yielding the equation
which can be simplified to:
As \( \varphi = \pi /3 \) and \( \alpha \) is a small angel, the equation can be rewritten as:
In this case, \( g_{\Omega } = R\omega^{2} /4 = 0.085 \) [Gal], so that the numerical solution for the change of the plumb line is about \( (\alpha \approx ) \) 15″ towards the north.
Solution to Exercise 3.3
Let us start from the expression
where
with
Then
and
where \( u = x,y,z. \)
Hence
and therefore:
Solution to Exercise 3.4
Insert (3.24b) into (3.23b) and apply it for r p = R:
Insert “the hint”:
Hence, by applying “the hint” and (3.23b) once more and changing the order of summation and integration one obtains:
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sjöberg, L.E., Bagherbandi, M. (2017). Classical Physical Geodesy. In: Gravity Inversion and Integration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50298-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50298-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50297-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50298-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)