Advertisement

Soil Quality

  • Miglena ZhiyanskiEmail author
  • Maria Sokolovska
  • Maria Glushkova
  • Urša Vilhar
  • Lyudmila Lozanova
Chapter
  • 1.8k Downloads
Part of the Future City book series (FUCI, volume 7)

Introduction

Urbanization is the main driver of rapid land-use change around the world, with important consequences for soil quantity and quality. Urban soils , in addition to their slow formation due to long-term natural processes, are decisively modified by urbanization. High levels of soil disturbance and new substrates added to the soil due to human activities change the morphology of the soil profile and the overall soil processes and functions. This is important because soils play an essential role in sustaining the provisioning of ecosystem services (ES) . However, the protection of urban soils is still poorly considered in the planning and development of urban areas – and there is a lack of knowledge regarding the potential of different types of vegetation cover and plant species to moderate the degradation of, or even improve, urban soils .

In terms of environmental ES, the direct role of soils in urban ecosystems is mainly expressed through the provision of regulation and...

Keywords

Green Space Urban Forest Green Roof Soil Crust Urban Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson PH, Pezeshki SR (2001) Effect of flood pre-conditioning on responses of three bottomland tree species to soil waterlogging. J Plant Physiol 158:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armsona D, Stringerb P, Ennosa AR (2013) The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester UK. Urban For Urban Green 12:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asadian F, Arzjani Z, Varavipour M (2010) Changes of microenvironment in Gilan City due to landslides. CJEES 5(1):93–102Google Scholar
  5. Bainard LD, Klironomos JN, Gordon AM (2011) The mycorrhizal status and colonization of 26 tree species growing in urban and rural environments. Mycorrihiza 21(2):91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bojarczuk K, Kieliszewska-Rokicka B (2010) Effect of ectomycorrhiza on Cu and Pb accumulation in leaves and roots of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) seedlings grown in metal-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 207:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bothe H, Turnau K, Regvar M (2010) The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in protecting endangered plants and habitats. Mycorrhiza 20(7):445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carreiro MM, Pouyat RV, Tripler CE et al (2009) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in soils of remnant forests along urban–rural gradients: case studies in the New York metropolitan area and Louisville, Kentucky. In: McDonnell MJ et al (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 308–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham SD, Ow DW (1996) Promises and prospects of phytoremediation – update on biotechnology. Plant Physiol 110:715–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doichinova V, Zhiyanski M, Hursthouse A et al (2014) Study on the mobility and bioavailability of PTEs in soils from urban forest parks in Sofia, Bulgaria. J Geochem Explor 147(Part B):222–228. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dominati E, Patterson M, Mackay A (2010) A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol Econ 69:1858–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edmondson J, Davies Z, McCormack S et al (2011) Are soils in urban ecosystems compacted? A citywide analysis. Biol Lett 7:771–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Environment Agency EEA (2000) Down to earth: soil degradation and sustainable development in Europe, Environmental issue series No 16. EEA, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  15. Früh B, Becker P, Deutschländer T et al (2011) Estimation of climate-change impacts on the urban heat load using an urban climate model and regional climate projections. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 50:167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groffman PM, Williams CO, Pouyat RV et al (2009) Nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide flux in urban forests and grasslands. J Environ Qual 38:1848–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gülten A, Aksoy UT, Öztop HF (2016) Influence of trees on heat island potential in an urban canyon. Sustain Cities Soc. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.006 Google Scholar
  18. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2013) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): consultation on version 4, August-December 2012Google Scholar
  19. Janeau JL, Mauchamp A, Tarin G (1999) The soil surface characteristics of vegetation stripes in Northern Mexico and their influences on system hydrodynamics: an experimental approach. Catena 37:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaye JP, Mcculley RL, Burke IC (2005) Carbon fluxes, nitrogen cycling, and soil microbial communities in adjacent urban, native and agricultural ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 11:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kernaghan G (2005) Mycorrhizal diversity: cause and effect. Pedobiologia 49:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kibblewhite MG, Jones RJA, Baritz R, et al (2008) ENVASSO final report part I: scientific and technical activities. ENVASSO Project (Contract 022713) coordinated by Cranfield University, UK, for Scientific Support to Policy, European Commission 6th Framework Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  23. Kotzen B (2003) An investigation of shade under six different tree species of the Negev desert towards their potential use for enhancing micro-climatic conditions in landscape architectural development. J Arid Environ 2:231–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Livesley SJ, Ossola A, Threlfall CG et al (2016) Soil carbon and carbon/nitrogen ratio change under tree canopy, tall grass, and turf grass areas of urban green space. J Environ Qual 45:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorenz K, Lal R (2009) Biochemical C and N cycles in urban soils. Environ Int 35:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lovett GM, Traynor MM, Pouyat RV et al (2000) Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban-rural gradient. Environ Sci Technol 34:4294–4300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martinová V, van Geel M, Lievens B, Honnay O (2016) Strong differences in Quercus robur-associated ectomycorrhizal fungal communities along a forest-city soil sealing gradient. Fungal Ecol 20:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntyre NE, Rango J, Fagan WF et al (2001) Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landsc Urban Plan 52:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morel J, Schwartz C, Florentin L et al (2005) Urban soils. In: Hillel D (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment, vol 4. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mullaney J, Lucke T, Trueman SJ (2015) A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landsc Urban Plan 134:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oh K, Cao T, Li T et al (2014) Study on application of phytoremediation technology in management and remediation of contaminated soils. JOCET 2(3):216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oke TR (1995) The heat island of the urban boundary layer: characteristics, causes and effects. In: Cermak JE et al (eds) Wind climate in cities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 81–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perez-Moreno J, Read DJ (2000) Mobilization and transfer of nutrients from litter to tree seedlings via the vegetative mycelium of ectomycorrhizal plants. New Phytol 145:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pouyat RV (1991) The urban–rural gradient: an opportunity to better understand human impacts on forest soils. In: Proceedings of the society of American foresters, 1990 annual convention, Washington, DC. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Pouyat RV, Mcdonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1995) Soil characteristics of oak stands along an urban–rural land use gradient. J Environ Qual 24:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Yesilonis ID (2010) Chemical, physical and biological characteristics of urban soils. Urban ecosystem ecology (Agronomy monograph 55), American Society of Crop Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 119–152Google Scholar
  38. RCEP (2006) The urban environment. 26th report. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Sarah P (2002) Spatial patterns of soil moisture as affected by shrubs, in different climatic conditions. Environ Monit Assess 73:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scalenghe R, Marsan FA (2009) The anthropogenic sealing of soil in urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan 90:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Stroganova M, Prokofieva T (2001) Urban soils classification for Russian cities of the taiga zone. In: Micheli E, Nachtergaele FO, Jones RJA et al (eds) Soil classification, European soil Bureau research report №7, EUR 20398 EN, (2002), vol 248. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 153–156Google Scholar
  43. Tyburska J, Frymark-Szymkowiak A, Kulczyk-Skrzeszewska M et al (2013) Mycorrhizal status of forest trees grown in urban and rural environments in Poland. Ecol Quest 18(1):51–59Google Scholar
  44. Van Camp L, Bujjarabal B, Gentile A-R et al (2004) Reports of the technical working groups established under the thematic strategy for soil protection, EUR 21319 EN/1. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg, p. 872Google Scholar
  45. Wong MH (2003) Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 50(6):775–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhiyanski M, Hursthouse A, Doncheva S (2015) Role of different components of urban and peri-urban forests to store carbon – a case-study of the Sandanski region, Bulgaria. JCBPS 5(3):3114–3128 E- ISSN:2249 –1929Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miglena Zhiyanski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Sokolovska
    • 1
  • Maria Glushkova
    • 1
  • Urša Vilhar
    • 2
  • Lyudmila Lozanova
    • 3
  1. 1.Forest Research InstituteBulgarian Academy of Sciences (FRI-BAS)SofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Department of Forest EcologySlovenian Forestry Institute (SFI)LjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem ResearchBulgarian Academy of Sciences (IBERBAS)SofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations