Water Regulation and Purification

  • Urša VilharEmail author
Part of the Future City book series (FUCI, volume 7)


As detailed in previous chapters, urban forests and trees are an integral part of a city’s green infrastructure (Benedict and McMahon 2006; Sanesi et al. 2011) and provide an array of different ecosystem services (Bolund and Hunhammar 1999; Tyrväinen et al. 2005; Livesley et al. 2014). Among the most critical of these services, in many cases, is the contribution of urban forestation to water retention and flood regulation (Sanders 1986).

Overwhelming stormwater volumes in urban environments have become a worldwide environmental and financial concern. The potential causes for increased flooding in European cities include higher rainfall intensities, ongoing urbanization and surface sealing, aging urban infrastructure, and deficient infrastructure capacities – since the existing infrastructures were not designed for current rainfall intensities (Kirnbauer et al. 2013). As a result, the ability to mitigate stormwater runoff in many urbanized watersheds around Europe has been...


Urban Forest Understory Vegetation Green Infrastructure Tree Canopy Cover Surface Water Runoff 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Armson D, Stringer P, Ennos AR (2012) The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urban For Urban Green 11:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armson D, Stringer P, Ennos AR (2013) The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban For Urban Green 12:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asadian YUMSD (2010) Rainfall interception in an urban environment. Master of science thesis. University of British Columbia, Faculty of Graduate Studies. The University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartens J, Day SD, Harris JR et al (2008) Can urban tree roots improve infiltration through compacted subsoils for stormwater management? J Environ Qual 37:2048–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2006) Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press, Washington, DC, 320 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen L, Zhang Z, Ewers BE (2012) Urban tree species show the same hydraulic response to vapor pressure deficit across varying tree size and environmental conditions. PLoS One 7:e47882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crockford RH, Richardson DP (2000) Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrol Process 14:2903–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duda AM, Lenat DR, Penrose DL (1982) Water quality in urban streams: what we can expect. J Water Pollut Control Fed 54(7):1139–1147Google Scholar
  9. Gallo EL, Lohse KA, Brooks PD et al (2012) Quantifying the effects of stream channels on storm water quality in a semi-arid urban environment. J Hydrol 470–471:98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inkiläinen ENM, Mchale MR, Blank GB, James AL, Nikinmaa E (2013) The role of the residential urban forest in regulating throughfall: a case study in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 119:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kermavnar J (2015) Sestojne padavine v izbranih urbanih gozdovih Ljubljane. Stand precipitation in selected urban forests in the city of Ljubljana. Magistrsko delo. Master of science thesis. Biotehniška fakulteta. Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire. Univerza v Ljubljani, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirnbauer MC, Baetz BW, Kenney WA (2013) Estimating the stormwater attenuation benefits derived from planting four monoculture species of deciduous trees on vacant and underutilized urban land parcels. Urban For Urban Green 12:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Le Pape P, Ayrault S, Quantin C (2012) Trace element behavior and partition versus urbanization gradient in an urban river (Orge River, France). J Hydrol 472–473:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Livesley SJ, Baudinette B, Glover D (2014) Rainfall interception and stem flow by eucalypt street trees – The impacts of canopy density and bark type. Urban For Urban Green 13:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mell IC, Henneberry J, Hehl-Lange S et al (2013) Promoting urban greening: valuing the development of green infrastructure investments in the urban core of Manchester, UK. Urban For Urban Gree 12:296–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Newham M, Fellows C, Sheldon F (2011) Functions of riparian forest in urban catchments: a case study from sub-tropical Brisbane, Australia. Urban Ecosyst 14:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pauleit S, Duhme F (2000) Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landsc Urban Plan 52:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanesi G, Gallis C, Kasperidus HD (2011) Urban forests and their ecosystem services in relation to human health. In: Nilsson K, Sangster M, Gallis C, Hartig T, De Vries S, Seeland K, Schipperijn J (eds) Forests, trees and human health. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 23–40Google Scholar
  19. Schooling JT, Carlyle-Moses DE (2015) The influence of rainfall depth class and deciduous tree traits on stemflow production in an urban park. Urban Ecosyst 18(4):1261–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seitz J, Escobedo F (2008) Urban forests in Florida: trees control stormwater runoff and improve water quality. For 239:1–4Google Scholar
  21. Siegert CM, Levia DF, Hudson SA et al (2016) Small-scale topographic variability influences tree species distribution and canopy throughfall partitioning in a temperate deciduous forest. For Ecol Manag 359:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soares AL, Rego FC, Mcpherson EG et al (2011) Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal. Urban For Urban Green 10:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Šraj M, Lah A, Brilly M (2008) Meritve in analiza prestreženih padavin navadne breze (Betula pendula Roth.) in rdečega bora (Pinus sylvestris L.) v urbanem okolju. Measurements and analysis of intercepted precipitation of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in urban area. Gozdarski vestnik 66:406–416Google Scholar
  24. Toba T, Ohta T (2005) An observational study of the factors that influence interception loss in boreal and temperate forests. J Hydrol 313:208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tyrväinen L (2001) Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. J Environ Manag 62:75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vilhar U (2016) Sestojne padavine v mešanih sestojih smreke in bukve na Pohorju. Throughfall in mixed beech-spruce forest in the Pohorje mountains. Gozdarski vestnik 74:28–45Google Scholar
  27. Vilhar U, Kobal M, Žlindra D et al. (2015) Urban ecosystem services, related to regulation of water flow, water purification and air pollution reduction. Landscape ecology of urban forests: enhancing ecosystem services. University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry, Ljubljana, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  28. Walsh CJ, Fletcher TD, Ladson AR (2005) Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:690–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiao QF, Mcpherson EG, Simpson JR et al (1998) Rainfall interception by Sacramento’s urban forest. J Arboric 24:235–244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest EcologySlovenian Forestry Institute (SFI)LjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations