Advertisement

The Role and Value of Urban Forests and Green Infrastructure in Promoting Human Health and Wellbeing

  • Giuseppe CarrusEmail author
  • Payam Dadvand
  • Giovanni Sanesi
Chapter
Part of the Future City book series (FUCI, volume 7)

Overview of the State-of-the-Art

Research from many different disciplines – including environmental psychology, urban forestry, human ecology, human geography, landscape architecture, and environmental epidemiology – has consistently highlighted the tendency of human beings to prefer scenes and settings where there is a substantial presence of natural elements, such as plants, trees and water (e.g., Purcell et al. 2001; Van den Berg et al. 2007). According to a shared view in the scientific community, such a preference can be explained through an evolutionary mechanism, which has selected the human capacity of appreciating those elements in their life settings that make an environment more suitable for survival, providing food, shelter from predators, and better survival conditions, in general. This vision has come to be known as the “biophilia hypothesis” (e.g., Kellert and Wilson 1993).

In the last two decades, with an increasing emphasis on the potential benefits of people-nature...

Keywords

Subjective Wellbeing Green Space Urban Forest Green Infrastructure Community Garden 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agay-Shay K, Peled A, Crespo AV, Peretz C, Amitai Y et al (2014) Green spaces and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Occup Environ Med 71:562–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agustina I, Beilin R (2012) Community gardens: space for interactions and adaptations. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 36:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amoly E, Dadvand P, Forns J, López-Vicente M, Basagaña X, Julvez J, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Sunyer J (2015) Green and blue spaces and behavioral development in Barcelona schoolchildren: the BREATHE Project. Environ Health Perspect 122(12):1351–1358Google Scholar
  4. Bell SL, Phoenix C, Lovell R, Wheeler BW (2014) Greenspace, health and wellbeing: making space for individual agency. Health Place 30:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S (2008) The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol Sci 19:1207–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowler D, Buyung-Ali L, Knight T, Pullin A (2010) A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10:456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabannes Y, Raposo I (2013) Peri-urban agriculture, social inclusion of migrant population and Right to the City Practices in Lisbon and London. City 17(2):235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter M (2013) From ‘healthful exercise’ to ‘nature on prescription’: the politics of urban green spaces and walking for health. Landsc Urban Plan 118:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, Agrimi M, Portoghesi L, Semenzato P, Sanesi G (2015a) Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the wellbeing of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 134:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrus G, Passiatore Y, Pirchio S, Scopelliti M (2015b) Contact with nature in educational settings might help cognitive functioning and promote positive social behavior. Psyecology 6:191–212Google Scholar
  11. Dadvand P, Sunyer J, Basagaña X, Ballester F, Lertxundi A et al (2012a) Surrounding greenness and pregnancy outcomes in four Spanish birth cohorts. Environ Health Perspect 120:1481–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dadvand P, de Nazelle A, Figueras F, Basagaña X, Sue J et al (2012b) Green space, health inequality and pregnancy. Environ Int 40:110–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dadvand P, de Nazelle A, Triguero-Mas M, Schembari A, Cirach M, Amoly E et al (2012c) Surrounding greenness and exposure to air pollution during pregnancy: an analysis of personal monitoring data. Environ Health Perspect 120(9):1286–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dadvand P, Villanueva CM, Font-Ribera L, Martinez D, Basagaña X et al (2014) Risks and benefits of green spaces for children: a cross-sectional study of associations with sedentary behavior, obesity, asthma, and allergy. Environ Health Perspect 122:1329–1325Google Scholar
  15. Dadvand P, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Esnaola M, Forns J, Basagaña X et al (2015a) Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:7937–7942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dadvand P, Rivas I, Basagaña X, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Su J, De Castro PM et al (2015b) The association between greenness and traffic-related air pollution at schools. Sci Total Environ 523:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dadvand P, Bartoll X, Basagaña X, Dalmau-Bueno A, Martinez D, Ambros A et al (2016) Green spaces and general health: roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environ Int 91:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Leeuw M, van Wichelen S (2012) Civilizing migrants: integration, culture and citizenship. Eur J Cult Stud 15(2):195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Vries S, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P (2003) Natural environments – healthy environments? An exploratory analysis on the relationship between greenspace and health. Environ Plann A 35(10):1717–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DellaValle CT, Triche EW, Leaderer BP, Bell ML (2012) Effects of ambient pollen concentrations on frequency and severity of asthma symptoms among asthmatic children. Epidemiology 23:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dzhambov AM, Dimitrova DD, Dimitrakova ED (2014) Association between residential greenness and birth weight: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urban For Urban Green 13:621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frumkin H (2001) Beyond toxicity. Human health and the natural environment. Am J Prev Med 20(3):234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuertes E, Markevych I, Bowatte G, Gruzieva O, Gehring U et al (2016) Residential greenness is differentially associated with childhood allergic rhinitis and aeroallergen sensitization in seven birth cohorts. Allergy. doi: 10.1111/all.12915: n/a-n/a Google Scholar
  24. Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, Dadvand P, Forns J et al (2015) Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:4354–4379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, Dadvand P, Rojas-Rueda D et al (2016) Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review. Environ Int 86:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Öhrström E (2007) Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 83(2):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grazuleviciene R, Danileviciute A, Dedele A, Vencloviene J, Andrusaityte S et al (2015) Surrounding greenness, proximity to city parks and pregnancy outcomes in Kaunas cohort study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 218:358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Groenewegen PP, van den Berg AE, Maas J, Verheij RA, de Vries S (2012) Is a green residential environment better for health? If so, why? Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102(5):996–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guéguen N, Stefan J (2014) “Green altruism” short immersion in natural green environments and helping behavior. Environ Behav 48(2):324–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanski I, von Hertzen L, Fyhrquist N, Koskinen K, Torppa K et al (2012) Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8334–8339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris N, Minniss FR, Somerset S (2014) Refugees connecting with a new country through community food gardening. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014(11):9202–9216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartig T (2004) Restorative environments. In: Spielberger C (ed) Encyclopaedia of applied psychology, vol 3. Elsevier/Academic, San Diego, pp 273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartig T, Cooper-Marcus C (2006) Healing gardens-places for nature in health care. Lancet 368:S36–S37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ Behav 23(1):3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hartig T, van den Berg AE, Hagerhall CM, Tomalak M, Bauer N, Hansmann R, Ojala A, Syngollitou E, Carrus G, van Herzele A, Bell S, Camilleri Podesta MT, Waaseth G (2011) Health benefits of nature experience: psychological, social and cultural processes. In: Nilsson K et al (eds) Forests, trees and human health. Berlin, Springer Science, pp 127–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hordyk SR, Hanley J, Richard E (2015) "Nature is there; its free": urban green space and the social determinants of health of immigrant families. Health Place 34:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Kellert SR, Wilson EO (1993) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Korpela KM, Ylén M (2007) Perceived health is associated with visiting natural favourite places in the vicinity. Health Place 13:148–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Korpela KM, Ylen M, Tyrvainen L, Silvennoinen H (2008) Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health Place 14:636–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lachowycz K, Jones AP (2011) Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev 12:e183–e189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lafortezza R, Carrus G, Sanesi G, Davies C (2009) Benefits and well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress. Urban For Urban Green 2:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larson LR, Jennings V, Cloutier SA (2016) Public parks and wellbeing in urban areas of the United States. PLoS One 11(4):e0153211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laurent O, Wu J, Li L, Milesi C (2013) Green spaces and pregnancy outcomes in Southern California. Health Place 24:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lovasi GS, Quinn JW, Neckerman KM, Perzanowski MS, Rundle A (2008) Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:647–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lovasi GS, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Lu JWT, Sheehan D, Perzanowski MS et al (2013) Urban tree canopy and asthma, wheeze, rhinitis, and allergic sensitization to tree pollen in a New York City Birth Cohort. Environ Health Perspect 121(4):494–500Google Scholar
  48. Maas J, Verheij RA, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P, Schellevis FG et al (2009a) Morbidity is related to a green living environment. J Epidemiol Community Health 63:967–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maas J, Van Dillen SME, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP (2009b) Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place 15(2):586–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, St Leger L (2006) Healthy nature healthy people:‘contact with nature’as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promot Int 21(1):45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Warber SL (2013) Walking for well-being: are group walks in certain types of natural environments better for well-being than group walks in urban environments? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10:5603–5628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mensah CA, Andres L, Perera U, Roji A (2016) Enhancing quality of life through the lens of green spaces: a systematic review approach. Int J Wellbeing 6(1):142–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Milligan C, Bingley A (2007) Restorative places or scary places? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health Place 13:799–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mitchell R, Popham F (2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372:1655–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neal S, Bennett K, Jones H, Cochrane A, Mohan G (2015) Multiculture and public parks: researching super-diversity and attachment in public green space. Popul Space Place 21:463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Kruize H, Gidlow C, Andrusaityte S, Antó JM, Basagaña X et al (2014) Positive health effects of the natural outdoor environment in typical populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE): a study programme protocol. BMJ Open 4:e004951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pearson DG, Craig T (2014) The great outdoors? Exploring the mental health benefits of natural environments. Front Psychol 5:1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phelan PE, Kaloush K, Miner M, Golden J, Phelan B, Silva H et al (2015) Urban heat Island: mechanisms, implications, and possible remedies. Annu Rev Environ Resour 40(1):285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pilat MA, McFarland A, Snelgrove A, Collins K, Waliczek TM et al (2012) The effect of tree cover and vegetation on incidence of childhood asthma in metropolitan statistical areas of Texas. HortTechnology 22:631–637Google Scholar
  60. Purcell T, Peron E, Berto R (2001) Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environ Behav 33:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rook GAW (2013) Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: an ecosystem service essential to health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(46):18360–18367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rook GAW, Lowry CA, Raison CL (2013) Microbial ‘old friends’, immunoregulation and stress resilience. Evol Med Public Health 1:46–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schipperijn J, Bentsen P, Jens Troelsen J, Toftager M, Stigsdotter UK (2013) Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban For Urban Green 12:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Taylor AF, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2002) Views of nature and self-discipline: evidence from inner city children. J Environ Psychol 22:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Twiss J, Dickinson J, Duma S, Kleinman T, Paulsen H, Rilveria L (2003) Community gardens: lessons learned from California healthy cities and communities. Am J Public Health 93(9):1435–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ulrich R (1984) View through a window may influence recovery. Science 224(4647):224–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11(3):201–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van den Berg A, Hartig T, Staats H (2007) Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. J Soc Issues 63:79–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. WHO (2010) Global recommendations on physical activity for health. P. 58. Switzerland. ISBN 978 92 4 159 997 9Google Scholar
  70. Winterfeld A (2014) State actions to reduce and prevent childhood obesity in schools and communities. National Conference of State Legislatures, p 50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Carrus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Payam Dadvand
    • 2
  • Giovanni Sanesi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EducationRoma Tre UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.ISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL)BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural and Environmental ScienceUniversity of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations