Advertisement

Case Studies: Modeling the Atmospheric Benefits of Urban Greening

  • Ana Isabel MirandaEmail author
  • Helena Martins
  • Joana Valente
  • Jorge H. Amorim
  • Carlos Borrego
  • Richard Tavares
  • Roeland Samson
  • Rocío Alonso del Amo
Chapter
  • 1.8k Downloads
Part of the Future City book series (FUCI, volume 7)

Introduction

Urban green infrastructure (UGI ) holds the potential to mitigate increasing temperatures as a result of climate change, and vegetation can contribute to urban air quality through air pollution mitigation (Nowak et al. 2006). Along with these environmental benefits, however, the presence of vegetation can have unwanted and unexpected effects on local air quality, for example through the emission of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs ) that can act as precursors of secondary air pollutants (Nowak et al. 2000).

These processes are all influenced by the nature of air circulation within the urban area, and it has been shown in field campaigns (Kikuchi et al. 2007), wind-tunnel experiments (Gromke and Ruck 2009) and numerical modelling (Mochida et al. 2008; Buccolieri et al. 2009), that the complexity of wind flow in a given urban space is significantly increased in the presence of urban vegetation.

The interactions of UGI with its environment are a consequence of...

Keywords

Street Canyon Urban Forest Computational Fluid Dynamic Model Green Roof Green Infrastructure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by FDEDER funds, through the operational program COMPETE and by national funds, through the National Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), in the framework of the project CLICURB (EXCL/AAG-MAA/0383/2012). This work was also partly supported by COST Action FP1204 “Green Infrastructure approach: linking environmental with social aspects in studying and managing urban forests.”

References

  1. Alonso R, Elvira S, Sanz MJ et al (2008) Sensitivity analysis of a parameterization of the stomatal component of the DO3SE model for Quercus ilex to estimate ozone fluxes. Environ Pollut 155:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amorim JH, Rodrigues V, Tavares R et al (2013a) CFD modelling of the aerodynamic effect of trees on urban air pollution dispersion. Sci Total Environ 461-462:541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amorim JH, Valente J, Cascão P et al (2013b) Pedestrian exposure to air pollution in cities: modelling the effect of roadside trees. Adv Meteorol. doi: 10.1155/2013/964904 Google Scholar
  4. Bealey WJ, McDonald AG, Nemitz E et al (2007) Estimating the reduction of urban PM10 concentrations by trees within an environmental information system for planners. J Environ Manag 85:44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrego C, Tchepel O, Costa AM et al (2003) Emission and dispersion modelling of Lisbon air quality at local scale. Atmos Environ 37:5197–5205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borrego C, Tchepel O, Costa AM et al (2006) Traffic-related particulate air pollution exposure in urban areas. Atmos Environ 40:7205–7214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buccolieri R, Gromke C, Di Sabatino S et al (2009) Aerodynamic effects of trees on pollutant concentration in street canyons. Sci Total Environ 407(19):5247–5256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emberson LD, Wieser G, Ashmore MR (2000) Modelling of stomatal conductance and ozone flux of Norway spruce: comparison with field data. Environ Pollut 109(3):393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Escobedo FJ, Nowak DJ (2009) Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landsc Urban Plan 90:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Environment Agency (2012) Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe: Challenges and opportunities for cities together with supportive national and European policies. Report No 2/2012, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  11. Gromke C, Ruck B (2009) On the impact of trees on dispersion processes of traffic emissions in street canyons. Bound-Layer Meteorol 131(1):19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hertel O, de Leeuw F, Raaschou-Nielsen O et al (2001) Human exposure to outdoor air pollution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 73(6):933–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kikuchi A, Hataya N, Mochida A et al (2007) Field study of the influences of roadside trees and moving automobiles on turbulent diffusion of air pollutants and thermal environment in urban street canyons. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation and Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC ‘07), Sendai, Japan, pp 137–144Google Scholar
  14. Mochida A, Tabata Y, Iwata T et al (2008) Examining tree canopy models for CFD prediction of wind environment at pedestrian level. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96(10–11):1667–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nowak DJ, Civerolo KL, Rao ST et al (2000) A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmos Environ 34:1610–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Gree 4:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC et al (2008) A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboricult Urban For 34:347–358Google Scholar
  18. Paoletti E (2009) Ozone and urban forests in Italy. Environ Pollut 157:1506–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pugh T, MacKenzie R, Whyatt J et al (2012) Effectiveness of green infrastructure for improvement of air quality in urban street canyons. Environ Sci Technol 46:7692–7699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schär C, Vidal PL, Lüthi D et al (2004) The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature 427:332–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vautard R, Beekman M, Desplat J et al (2007) Air quality in Europe during the summer of 2003 as a prototype of air quality in a warmer climate. Compt Rendus Geosci 339:747–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J et al (2005) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Gree 3:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Isabel Miranda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Helena Martins
    • 2
  • Joana Valente
    • 1
  • Jorge H. Amorim
    • 3
  • Carlos Borrego
    • 1
  • Richard Tavares
    • 4
  • Roeland Samson
    • 5
  • Rocío Alonso del Amo
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Environment and Planning & CESAMUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological InstituteNorrköpingSweden
  3. 3.Atmospheric Environment Research Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological InstituteNorrköpingSweden
  4. 4.PRACE AISBLBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.Faculty of Sciences, Department of Bioscience EngineeringUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  6. 6.Ecotoxicology of Air PollutionCIEMATMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations