Advertisement

Speech Coding pp 123-130 | Cite as

Pre- and Postfiltering

  • Tom BäckströmEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

At low bitrates, basic CELP codecs have an easily recognisable distortion characteristic often described as noisiness or roughness. To reduce the perceptual distortion, we can try to identify and remove typical artefacts by filtering the decoded signal. In this chapter we present most typical postfiltering techniques such as formant enhancement and bass post filtering.

Keywords

Perceptual Model Harmonic Structure Randomise Quantisation Noisy Characteristic Harmonic Peak 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP. TS 26.445, EVS Codec Detailed Algorithmic Description; 3GPP Technical Specification (Release 12) (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bäckström, T., Ghido, F., Fischer, J.: Blind recovery of perceptual models in distributed speech and audio coding. In: Proceedings of Interspeech (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bastiaan Kleijn, W.: Enhancement of coded speech by constrained optimization. In: IEEE Workshop Proceedings, Speech Coding, 2002, pp. 163–165. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, J.-H., Gersho, A.: Adaptive postfiltering for quality enhancement of coded speech. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 3(1), 59–71 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiba, H., Kamamoto, Y., Moriya, T., Harada, N., Miyabe, S., Yamada, T., Makino, S.: Adaptive post-filtering controlled by pitch frequency for CELP-based speech coder. In: 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2014, pp. 838–842. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuchs, G., Lombard, A., Ravelli, E., Dietz, M.: A comfort noise addition post-processor for enhancing low bit-rate speech coding in noisy environments. In: 2015 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), pp. 498–502. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grancharov, V., Plasberg, J.H., Samuelsson, J., Kleijn, W.B.: Generalized postfilter for speech quality enhancement. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 16(1), 57–64 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herre, J., Gbur, U., Ehret, A., Dietz, M., Teichmann, B., Kunz, O., Brandenburg, K., Gerhäuser, H.: Method for signalling a noise substitution during audio signal coding. US Patent 6,766,293, 20 July 2004Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hojjat, S.P., Sadri, K.F., Shirani, S.: Multiple description coding of audio using phase scrambling. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2008, pp. 153–156. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ITU-T Recommendation G.718. Frame error robust narrow-band and wideband embedded variable bit-rate coding of speech and audio from 8–32 kbit/s (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jayant, N.S., Ramamoorthy, V.: Adaptive postfiltering of 16 kb/s-ADPCM speech. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, vol. 11, pp. 829–832. IEEE (1986)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malvar, H.S.: System and method for masking quantization noise of audio signals, US Patent 6,058,362, 2 May 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCree, A.V., Barnwell III, T.P.: A mixed excitation LPC vocoder model for low bit rate speech coding. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 3(4), 242–250 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taniguchi, T., Johnson, M., Ohta, Y.: Pitch sharpening for perceptually improved CELP, and the sparse-delta codebook for reduced computation. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, pp. 241–244. IEEE (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Truman, M.M., Davidson, G.A., Fellers, M.C., Vinton, M.S., Watson, M.A., Robinson, C.Q.: Audio coding system using spectral hole filling, US Patent 7,447,631, 4 Nov 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, S., Gersho, A.: Improved excitation for phonetically-segmented VXC speech coding below 4 kb/s. In: Global Telecommunications Conference and Exhibition, GLOBECOM’90, 1990, pp. 946–950. IEEE (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Audio Laboratories Erlangen (AudioLabs)Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations