Windowing and the Zero Input Response

  • Tom BäckströmEmail author
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)


Speech processing algorithms usually segment signals into finite-length blocks or windows, since block operations are generally more efficient in terms of both bitrate and computational complexity. Speech codecs model temporal correlations with linear prediction for both coding efficiency as well as to enable smooth transitions between frames. This chapter describes this framing or windowing process based on linear prediction. A central feature of this windowing process is the zero input response of the corresponding linear predictive model, which corresponds to the smooth overlap between processing windows.


Window Length Linear Prediction Error Energy Window Method Autocorrelation Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bäckström, T.: Comparison of windowing in speech and audio coding. In: Proceedings of WASPAA, New Paltz, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bäckström, T.: Computationally efficient objective function for algebraic codebook optimization in ACELP. In: Proceedings of Interspeech (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bäckström, T., Helmrich, C.R.: Decorrelated innovative codebooks for ACELP using factorization of autocorrelation matrix. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, pp. 2794–2798 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosi, M., Goldberg, R.E.: Introduction to Digital Audio Coding and Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edler, B.: Coding of audio signals with overlapping block transform and adaptive window functions. Frequenz 43(9), 252–256 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer, J., Bäckström, T.: Comparison of windowing schemes for speech coding. In: Proceedings of EUSIPCO (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerlach, C.G.: Analysis-by-synthesis speech coding with extended approximation interval. In: IEEE Workshop on Speech Coding for Telecommunications, 1993. Proceedings, pp. 33–34. IEEE (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerlach, C.G.: CELP speech coding with almost no codebook search. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, vol. 2, pp. II–109. IEEE (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malvar, H.S.: Lapped transforms for efficient transform/subband coding. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 38(6), 969–978 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malvar, H.S.: Signal Processing with Lapped Transforms. Artech House, Inc. (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rabiner, L.R., Schafer, R.W.: Digital Processing of Speech Signals, vol. 100. Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Audio Laboratories Erlangen (AudioLabs)Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations