Advertisement

Speech Coding pp 205-215 | Cite as

Relaxed Code-Excited Linear Prediction (RCELP)

  • Guillaume Fuchs
  • Tom BäckströmEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

While code-excited linear prediction shows good performance for bitrates above 8 kbits/s, the quality of the speech-specific waveform coding scheme drops noticeably at lower rates. At such low rates, all information included in the waveform of the speech cannot be correctly coded. On the other hand, parametric speech coders also called vocoders concentrate only on key perceptual features of speech, rather than the entire waveform. By encoding parameters of a linear model of speech, speech parametric coding can reach rates of 4 kbits/s down to 0.5 kbits/s, thought the quality is often qualified as synthetic. The relaxed code-excited linear prediction (RCELP) is a way of extending the code-excited linear prediction coding scheme towards low rates by keeping a natural speech quality. RCELP uses the generalised analysis-by-synthesis paradigm, which relaxes the waveform-matching constraints without affecting speech quality. The basic principle is to ease the encoding of the signal by modifying appropriately the input signal.

References

  1. 1.
    Enhanced variable-rate codec, speech service option 3 for wideband spread spectrum digital systems, in TIA/EIS/IS-127 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Enhanced variable rate codec, speech service option 3 and 68 for wideband spread spectrum digital systems, in 3GPP2 C.S0014-C v1.0 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.729: A silence compression scheme for G.729 optimized for terminals conforming to recommendation v.70, in G.729 Annex B (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kleijn, W.B., Kroon, P., Cellario, L., Sereno, D.: A 5.85 kbits CELP algorithm for cellular applications. In: Proceedings of the ICASSP, vol. 2, pp. 596–599 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kleijn, W.B., Ramachandran, R.P., Kroon, P.: Generalized analysis-by-synthesis coding and its application to pitch prediction. In: Proceedings of the ICASSP, vol. 1, pp. 337–340 (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krishnan, V., Rajendran, V., Kandhadai, A., Manjunath, S.: EVRC-wideband: the new 3GPP2 wideband vocoder standard. In: Proceedings of the ICASSP, vol. 2, pp. II–333–II–336 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laakso, T.I., Valimaki, V., Karjalainen, M., Laine, U.K.: Splitting the unit delay (FIR/all pass filters design). IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 13(1), 30–60 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tammi, M., Jelinek, M., Ruoppila, V.T.: Signal modification method for variable bit rate wide-band speech coding. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 13(5), 799–810 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang G., Shlomot, E., Benyassine, A., Thyssen, J., Su, H.-Y., Murgia, C.: The SMV algorithm selected by TIA and 3GPP2 for CDMA applications. In: Proceedings of the ICASSP, vol. 2, pp. 709–712 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Audio Laboratories Erlangen (AudioLabs)Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations