Advertisement

To Recall to Play in the Street: A Critical Review of the Transformation of the Game Concept, Importance and Place of Game in Children’s World

  • Pervin Oya TaneriEmail author
  • Mehmet M. Akgunduz
  • K. Funda Nayir
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10056)

Abstract

This argumentative study focused on the relationship between children’s traditional play cultures and their technology-based play. When the literature examined, it was seen that traditional games contribute children character development, as well as linguistic and communicative development. When children allowed to play outdoor and/or traditional games, they explore the nature, learn democratic behaviors, acquire creative and critical thinking skills, learn how to communicate politely with others, develop muscle strength and coordination, learn sharing and caring, and obtain problems solving skills and self-confidence. In other words, playing traditional games supports the overall development of mind and body of a children. However, nowadays, many children spend too much time indoors, by playing online games, and/or sitting in front of a screen (e.g. television, tablet pc, or smart phone). In contrast to traditional games, online games do not include social interaction. In this study, the significance of game was clarified, and both positive and negative effects of gamification was demonstrated. Consequently, the aim of this study to generate a theoretical framework that display an understanding of theories and concepts that are relevant to the place and importance of games on children’s world and disclose a critical perspective about playing games in digital world. Therefore, relevant research studies for theories and analytic models were reviewed and interpreted in order to present two sides of gamification and highlight the importance of games.

Keywords

Play Traditional games Digital games Loose of contact Contactless games Importance of games 

References

  1. 1.
    Fleer, M.: Universal fantasy: the domination of Western theories of play. In: Dau, E., Jones, E. (eds.) Child’s Play: Revisiting Play İn Early Childhood Settings, pp. 67–80. MacLennan and Petty Sydney, Philadelphia and London (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carr, H.H.: The survival value of play. Investigation of the Department of Psychology and Education: University of Colorado (1902)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arslan, F.: 1-3 Yas donemindeki cocugun oyun ve oyuncak ozelliklerinin gelisim kuramlari ile aciklanmasi. C.U. Hemsirelik Yuksek Okulu Dergisi 4(2), 40–43 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sevinc, M.: Erken Cocukluk Gelisimi ve Egitiminde Oyun. Morpa Kultur Yayinlari, Ankara (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Özyeşer-Cinel, N.: Farkli Sosyo-Ekonomik Duzeydeki 3-6 Yas Grubu Cocugu Olan Anne Babalarin Oyuncak ve Oyun Materyalleri Hakkindaki Goruslerinin ve Bu Yas Grubu Cocuklarin Sahip Olduklari Oyuncak ve Oyun Materyallerinin İncelenmesi. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Gazi University the Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colak, F.: Geleneksel Kayseri Cocuk Oyunlari ve Halkbilimsel İncelemesi. Komen Yayinlari, Konya (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elkind, D.: The Power of Play: Learning What Comes Naturally. Da Capo Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Senda, M.: Safety in public spaces for children’s play and learning. Int. Assoc. Traffic Saf. Sci. 38(2), 103–115 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sălceanu, C.: The influence of computer games on children’s development. Exploratory study on the attitudes of parents. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 149, 837–841 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffiths, M.D., Hunt, N.: Computer game playing in adolescence: prevalence and demographic indicators. J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 5, 189–194 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffiths, M.D., Hunt, N.: Dependence on computer game playing by adolescents. Psychol. Rep. 82, 475–480 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gunuc, S.: Relationships and associations between video game and Internet addictions: is tolerance a symptom seen in all conditions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 517–525 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weinstein, A.M.: Computer and video game addiction. A comparison between game users and non-game users. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 36(5), 268–276 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson, C.A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E.L., Bushman, B.J., Sakamoto, A., Saleem, M.: Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 136, 151–173 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferguson, C.J.: The good, the bad, and the ugly: a meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatr. Q. 78, 309–316 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greitemeyer, T., Mügge, D.O.: Video games do affect social outcomes: a meta- analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 578–589 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Griffiths, M.D.: Video games and aggression: a review of the literature. Aggress. Violent Behav. 4, 203–212 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huesmann, L.R.: Nailing the coffin shut on doubts that violent video games stimulate aggression: comment on Anderson et al. Psychol. Bull. 136(2010), 179–181 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCarthy, R.J., Coley, S.L., Wagner, M.F., Zengel, B., Basham, A.: Does playing video games with violent content temporarily increase aggressive inclinations? A pre-registered experimental study. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 67, 13–19 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Griffiths, M.D.: Computer game playing in children and adolescents: a review of the literature. In: Gill, T. (ed.) Electronic Children: How Children are Responding to the Information Revolution, pp. 41–58. National Children’s Bureau, London (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caillois, R.: The definition of play and the classification of games. In: The Games Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology. MIT Press, Cambridge, London (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Groos, K.: The Play of Animals. D. Appleton and Co., New York (1898)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens. Oyunun Toplumsal İşlevi Üzerine Bir Deneme, 4th edn. Çeviren: Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay. Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitchell, E.D., Mason, B.S.: The Theory of Play. Barnes and Co., New York (1948)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lazarus, M.: Uber die Reize des Spiels. F. Dummler, Germany (1883)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wood, E., Attfield, J.: Play, Learning and the Early Childhood Curriculum. Paul Chapman Publishing, London (1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dockett, S., Fleer, S.: Play and Pedagogy in Early Childhood: Bending the Rules. Harcourt Brace, San Diego (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sağlam, T.: Dramatik Eğitim: Amaç mı? Araç mı? Tiyatro Araştırmaları Dergisi 17, 4–21 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adıgüzel, H.Ö., Üstündağ, T., Öztürk, A.: İlköğretimde Drama. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, M.R.: Why play = learning. In: Tremblay, R.E., Boivin, M., Peters, R.D. (eds.) Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development (Summer, 2012 Ed.) (2008). http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/documents/Hirsh-Pasek-GolinkoffANGxp.pdf
  31. 31.
    Baranowski, T., Thompson, W.O., DuRant, R.H., Baranowski, J., Puhl, J.: Observations on physical activity in physical locations: age, gender, ethnicity, and month effects. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 64(2), 127–133 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown, W.H., Pfeiffer, K.A., McIver, K.L., Dowda, M., Addy, C.L., Pate, R.R.: Social and environmental factors associated with preschoolers’ non-sedentary physical activity. Child Dev. 80(1), 45–58 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kapoor, P.: Value of outdoor games. Educational and Informational Articles (2014). http://www.edgearticles.com/55/essays/value-of-outdoor-games/. Accessed 01 Sept 2016
  34. 34.
    Cornell, J.B.: Sharing Nature with Children: The Classic Parents’ & Teachers’ Nature Awareness Guidebook. DAWN Publications, Nevada City (1998)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gregson, B.: The Outrageous Outdoor Games Book: 133 Group Projects, Games, and Activities. Fearon Teacher Aids, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rockwell, R., Sherwood, E., Williams, R.: Hug a Tree: And Other Things to Do Outdoors with Young Children. Gryphon House Inc., Lewisville (1983)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rivkin, M.S.: The Great Outdoors: Restoring Children’s Right to Play Outside. National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington, D.C (1995)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sanders, B.: A is for Ox the Collapse of Literacy and the Rise of Violence in an Electronic Age. Random House, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sutton-Smith, B.: The Ambiguity of Play. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gill, T.: Free range kids: why children need simple pleasures and everyday freedom, and what we can do about it. Dairylea, Cheltenham (2011). http://www.dairyleasimplefunreport.co.uk/pdf/Dairylea%20Simple%20Fun%20Report%20-%20FINAL.pdf
  41. 41.
    Uğurlu, Ö.: Elektronik Dünyanın Çocuk Dünyasına Yansıması: “Temassız Oyun” Kavramı Bağlamında Eleştirel Bir İnceleme. İletişim ve Diplomasi Dergisi 1(2), 51–62 (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gunturkun, E.: Yapi Oyuncaklarinin Tarihsel ve Yapisal Gelisimi (Lego Ornegi İle). Yuksek Lisans Tezi (Yayinlanmis), Marmara Universitesi, Guzel Sanatlar Fakultesi, İstanbul (2009)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Toksoy, A.C.: Yarisma Niteligi Tasiyan Geleneksel Cocuk Oyunlari, Acta Turcica Cevrimici Tematik, Turkoloji Dergisi, II/1, 205–220 (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Girmen, P.: Eskisehir Folklorunda Cocuk Oyunlari ve Bu Oyunlarin Yasam Becerisi Kazandirmadaki Rolu. Milli Folklor 24(95), 263–273 (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bishop, J., Curtis, M.: Play Today in the Primary School Playground. Open University Press, Buckingham (2001)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gangadharbatla, H.: Technology component: a modified systems approach to creative thought. Creat. Res. J. 22(2), 219–227 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sibireva, M.: Socialization of Children through Play: Socialization of Children through Play (Children as Co-researchers) (2012). https://www.scribd.com/doc/126541380/Socialization-of-Children-in-the-City-Environment-Through-Play. Accessed 01 Sept 2016
  48. 48.
    Opie, I., Opie, P.: Children’s Games in Street and Playground: Chasing, Catching, Seeking, Hunting, Racing, Dueling, Exerting, Daring, Guessing, Acting, Pretending. Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Winter, K.: Children today would rather read, do chores or even do HOMEWORK than play outside and they get out half as much as their parents did (2013). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2307431/Children-today-read-chores-HOMEWORK-play-outside.html#ixzz4M2eQR1Pi. Accessed 01 Oct 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pervin Oya Taneri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mehmet M. Akgunduz
    • 2
  • K. Funda Nayir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesÇankırı Karatekin UniversityÇankırıTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Education Management and PolicyAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations