Advertisement

Designing Virtual River: A Serious Gaming Environment to Collaboratively Explore Management Strategies in River and Floodplain Maintenance

  • Robert-Jan den HaanEmail author
  • Vivian Juliette Cortes Arevalo
  • Mascha van der Voort
  • Suzanne Hulscher
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10056)

Abstract

Dutch river management is in transition from a phase of intervention and implementation to a phase of maintenance. In light of this transition, we discuss initial results towards the development of a serious gaming environment where river and floodplain management actors can collaboratively explore intervention and maintenance strategies. We introduce the design approach of a serious gaming environment based on qualitative interviews with river and floodplain maintenance actors. Based on these interviews, we identified two key variables to explore strategies for river and floodplain maintenance: maintenance intervals and floodplain scaling. We proceed with presenting the Virtual River; a concept for a serious gaming environment. In this environment, actors can play out intervention and maintenance scenarios around these two key variables over time using simplified hydrological, morphodynamic and vegetation models.

Keywords

Nature Objective Nature Manager Water Safety River Management Floodplain Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research for this paper was conducted as part of the program RiverCare: towards self-sustaining multifunctional rivers, funded by the Technology Foundation STW (Grant Number P12-P14). In addition, the authors would like to thank all interview participants for their participation and cooperation.

References

  1. 1.
    Chew, C., Lloyd, G.J., Knudsen, E.: Capacity building in water with serious games. In: Sourina, O., Wortley, D., Kim, S. (eds.) Subconscious Learning via Games and Social Media, pp. 27–43. Springer, Singapore (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoekstra, A.Y.: Computer-supported games and role plays in teaching water management. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 9, 1859–1884 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barreteau, O., Abrami, G.: Variable time scales, agent-based models, and role-playing games: the PIEPLUE river basin management game. Simul. Gaming 38, 352–361 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valkering, P., et al.: Modelling cultural and behavioural change in water management: an integrated, agent based, gaming approach. Integr. Assess. 9(1), 19–46 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valkering, P., et al.: A perspective-based simulation game to explore future pathways of a water-society system under climate change. Simul. Gaming 44(2-3), 366–390 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ubbels, A., Verhallen, A.J.M.: The use of role-playing in integrated water management. In: Proceedings of the International Assembly of Hydrological Sciences, pp. 191–197, Maastricht, The Netherlands (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rebolledo-Mendez, G., et al.: Societal impact of a serious game on raising public awareness: the case of FloodSim. In: Proceedings of the 2009 SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, pp. 15–22. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rijcken, T., Stijnen, J., Slootjes, N.: “SimDelta” - inquiry into an internet-based interactive model for water infrastructure development in The Netherlands. Water 4(2), 295–320 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mayer, I.S.: The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: a review. Simul. Gaming 40(6), 825–862 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bekebrede, G.: Experiencing complexity: a gaming approach for understanding infrastructure systems. Dissertation TU Delft, Delft University of Technology (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fliervoet, J.M., Van der Born, R.J.G.: From implementation towards maintenance: sustaining collaborative initiatives for integrated floodplain management in the Netherlands. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 1–21 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pahl-Wostl, C.: The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecol. Soc. 11(1) (2006). Article No. 10, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art10/
  13. 13.
    Warner, J., Edelenbos, J., Van Buuren, A.: Making space for the river: governance challenges. In: Warner, J., Van Buuren, A., Edelenbos, J. (eds.) Making Space for the River: Governance Experiences with Multifunctional River Flood Management in the US and Europe, pp. 1–14. IWA Publishing, London (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olsson, P., Folke, C., Berkes, F.: Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ. Manag. 34(1), 75–90 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Armitage, D.R., et al.: Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7(2), 95–102 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fliervoet, J.M., et al.: Combining safety and nature: a multi-stakeholder perspective on integrated floodplain management. J. Environ. Manag. 128, 1033–1042 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vreugdenhil, H.S.I.: Pilot projects in water management: practicing change and changing practice. Dissertation TU Delft, Delft University of Technology (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pahl-Wostl, C.: Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour. Manag. 21(1), 49–62 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pratt Miles, J.D.: Designing collaborative processes for adaptive management: four structures for multistakeholder collaboration. Ecol. Soc. 18(4) (2013). Article No. 5, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art5/
  20. 20.
    Mayer, I., Warmelink, H., Zhou, Q.: A frame-reflective discourse analysis of serious games. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(2), 342–357 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reed, M., et al.: What is social learning? Ecol. Soc. 15(4) (2010). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/
  22. 22.
    Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., Attonaty, J.: Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 4(2), 5 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duijn, M., et al.: Gaming approach route 26: a combination of computer simulation, design tools and social interaction. J. Artif. Soc. Soc.Simul. 6(3) (2003). Article No. 7, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/3/7.html
  24. 24.
    Hummel, H.G.K., et al.: Scripted collaboration in serious gaming for complex learning: effects of multiple perspectives when acquiring water management skills. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 42(6), 1029–1041 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keen, M., Brown, V.A., Dyball, R.: Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a Sustainable Future. Routledge, Abingdon (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Erlandson, D.A.: Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van der Bijl-Brouwer, M.: Exploring usability. Design for dynamic and diverse use situations. Dissertation University of Twente, The Netherlands (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dervin, B., Foreman-Wernet, L.: Sense-Making Methodology as an Approach to Understanding and Designing for Campaign Audiences. SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert-Jan den Haan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vivian Juliette Cortes Arevalo
    • 2
  • Mascha van der Voort
    • 1
  • Suzanne Hulscher
    • 2
  1. 1.Design DepartmentUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Water Engineering and ManagementUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations