Mobile Learning Game Authoring Tools: Assessment, Synthesis and Proposals

  • Aous KarouiEmail author
  • Iza Marfisi-Schottman
  • Sébastien George
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10056)


Mobile Learning Games (MLGs) show great potential for increasing engagement, creativity and authentic learning. Yet, despite their great potential for education, the use of MLGs by teachers, remains limited. This is partly due to the fact that MLGs are often designed to match a specific learning context, and thus cannot be reusable for other contexts. Therefore, researchers have recently designed various types of MLG authoring tools. However, these authoring tools are not always adapted to non-computer-scientists or non-game-designers. Hence, we propose in this paper to focus on five existing MLG authoring tools, in order to assess their features and usability with the help of five teachers, who are used to organizing educational field trips. In the second part of this paper, we present an approach for designing a MLG authoring tool, based on the lacks identified through the analysis, and tailored to the teachers’ different profiles and needs.


Mobile learning game Authoring tool Usability Assessment 


  1. 1.
    Admiraal, W., Huizenga, J., Akkerman, S., ten Dam, G.: The concept of flow in collaborative game-based learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 1185–1194 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwabe, G., Göth, C.: Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and motivational effects. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 21, 204–216 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spikol, D.: Exploring novel learning practices through co-designing mobile games. Presented at the (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., Kampylis, P., Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y.: Horizon Report Europe: 2014 Schools Edition. New Media Consort (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klemke, R., van Rosmalen, P., Ternier, S., Westera, W.: Keep it simple: lowering the barrier for authoring serious games. Simul. Gaming 46, 40–67 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karoui, A., Marfisi-Schottman, I., George, S.: Towards an efficient mobile learning games design model. In: European Conference on Games Based Learning, Steinkjer, Norway, pp. 276–285 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bastien, J.M.C., Scapin, D.L.: Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human-computer interfaces. INRIA (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gagnon, D.J.: ARIS. The University of Wisconsin-Madison (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rouillard, J., Serna, A., David, B., Chalon, R.: Rapid prototyping for mobile serious games. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8524, pp. 194–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07485-6_20 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slany, W.: Pocket code: a scratch-like integrated development environment for your phone. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Systems, Programming, and Applications: Software for Humanity, pp. 35–36. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zbick, J., Nake, I., Jansen, M., Milrad, M.: mLearn4Web: a web-based framework to design and deploy cross-platform mobile applications. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murray, T.: Design tradeoffs in usability and power for advanced educational software authoring tools. Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ 44, 10–16 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ritter, S., Blessing, S.B., Wheeler, L.: Authoring tools for component-based learning environments. In: Murray, T., Blessing, S.B., Ainsworth, S. (eds.) Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments, pp. 467–489. Springer, Netherlands (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oja, M.-K.: Designing for collaboration: improving usability of complex software systems. In: CHI 2010 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3799–3804. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murray, T.: Coordinating the complexity of tools, tasks, and users: on theory-based approaches to authoring tool usability. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26, 37–71 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aous Karoui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iza Marfisi-Schottman
    • 1
  • Sébastien George
    • 1
  1. 1.COMUE UBL, Université du Maine, EA 4023, LIUMLe MansFrance

Personalised recommendations