Advertisement

A Semantic Frame Approach to Support Serious Game Design

  • Manuel GentileEmail author
  • Giuseppe Città
  • Simona Ottaviano
  • Dario La Guardia
  • Valentina Dal Grande
  • Mario Allegra
  • Aki Jarvinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10056)

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodological framework to support the design of educational games based on a semantic frame analysis. Starting from a Frame Semantics point of view, the authors provide a deepen analysis of game mechanics definitions using the key concept of verb. To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed model an example is reported to illustrate how we can explicit the game mechanics used in a management/construction game by means of FrameNet and WordNet ontologies.

Keywords

Serious games design Game mechanics Semantic frame 

References

  1. 1.
    Lameras, P., Arnab, S., Dunwell, I., Stewart, C., Clarke, S., Petridis, P.: Essential features of serious games design in higher education: linking learning attributes to game mechanics (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rooney, P.: A theoretical framework for serious game design: exploring pedagogy, play and fidelity and their implications for the design process 2(4), 41–60 (2012). doi: 10.4018/ijgbl.2012100103
  3. 3.
    Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., De Freitas, S., Louchart, S., De Gloria, A.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(2), 391–411 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jrvinen, A.: Games Without Frontiers: Theories and Methods for Game Studies and Design. Tampere University Press, Tampere (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitgutsch, K., Alvarado, N.: Purposeful by design: a serious game design assessment framework. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG 2012, pp. 121–128 (2012). doi: 10.1145/2282338.2282364
  6. 6.
    Langacker, R.W.: Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, vol. 1. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Almeida, R.G., Manouilidou, C.: The study of verbs in cognitive science. In: de Almeida, R.G., Manouilidou, C. (eds.) Cognitive Science Perspectives on Verb Representation and Processing, pp. 3–39. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pinker, S.: Learnability Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levin, B., Hovav, M.R.: Argument Realization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tomasello, M.: Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gentner, D.: Why verbs are hard to learn. In: How Children Learn Verbs Action Meets Word, pp. 544–564 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langacker, R.W.: Investigations in Cognitive Grammar, vol. 42. Walter de Gruyter, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paradis, C.: Lexical semantics. In: Chapelle, C.A. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, pp. 3356–3357. WileyBlackwell, Hoboken (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fillmore, C.: Frame semantics. In: Linguistics in the Morning Calm, pp. 111–137 (1982)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fillmore, C.J., Atkins, B.T.: Toward a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In: Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, vol. 103, pp. 75–102 (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boas, H.C.: From theory to practice: frame semantics and the design of FrameNet. Semantik im Lexikon 479, 129–159 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pustejovsky, J., Boguraev, B.: Lexical semantics. Lexical Semantics (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baldwin, T.: Lexical Semantics: An Introduction, Lecture Notes from the ACL/HCSNet Advanced Program in Natural Language Processing, Melbourne, Australia (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elman, J.L.: Lexical knowledge without a mental lexicon? Ment. Lexicon 60, 1–33 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elman, J.L.: On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cogn. Sci. 33(4), 547–582 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Culicover, P.W., Jackendoff, R.: The simpler sintax hypotesis. TRENDS Cogn. Sci. 10(9), 413–418 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jackendoff, R.: Meaning and the Lexicon: The Parallel Architecture 1975–2010. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Gelder, T., Port, R.: Beyond symbolic: prolegomena to a kama-sutra of compositionality. In: Honavar, V., Uhr, L. (eds.) Symbol Processing and Connectionist Models in Artificial Intelligence and Cognition: Steps Toward Integration. Academic Press, San Diego (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Città, G.: L’asimmetria nominale del primo lessico come tappa iniziale di una conoscenza linguistica softly assembled. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 4, 21–32 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cruse, D.A.: Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fillmore, C.J.: Frame semantics. Cogn. Linguist.: Basic Readings 34, 373–400 (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Petruck, M.R.: Frame semantics. In: Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 1–13 (1996)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Minsky, M.: A framework for representing knowledge (1975)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Langacker, R.W.: Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J.: A frame approach to semantic analysis. In: Heine, B., Narrog, H. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Oxford, UK (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fellbaum, C.: WordNet. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Hoboken (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pazienza, M.T., Pennacchiotti, M., Zanzotto, F.M.: Mixing wordnet, verbnet and propbank for studying verb relations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC-2006, pp. 1372–1377 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ježek, E.: The Lexicon: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Gentile
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giuseppe Città
    • 1
  • Simona Ottaviano
    • 1
  • Dario La Guardia
    • 1
  • Valentina Dal Grande
    • 1
  • Mario Allegra
    • 1
  • Aki Jarvinen
    • 2
  1. 1.ITD - National Research Council of ItalyPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Sheffield Hallam University, City CampusSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations