Advertisement

Design Considerations for Building a Scalable Digital Version of a Multi-player Educational Board Game for a MOOC in Logistics and Transportation

  • Heide LukoschEmail author
  • Shalini Kurapati
  • Geertje Bekebrede
  • Simon Tiemersma
  • Daan Groen
  • Linda van Veen
  • Alexander Verbraeck
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10056)

Abstract

With more flexible and large-scale learning environments, new design requirements for games emerge. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are one of the most important innovations in the learning field. Still, it is a challenge to motivate learners and to keep them motivated in such huge learning environments. To address this challenge, we redesigned a board game targeting at an integrated view on disruption and communication management in an intermodal transportation situation. From the redesign, we have learned that an online game works better with fewer roles, requires immediate feedback, and an engaging way of challenge to keep players motivated. Our findings can inform the design of games for large groups of players in an online environment.

Keywords

Game Play Situational Awareness Game Design Online Game Container Terminal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Dutch Institute for Advanced Logistics (DINALOG-TKI) funded this research initiative.

References

  1. 1.
    Kafai, Y.B., Peppler, K.A.: Beyond small groups: new opportunities for research in computer-supported collective learning. In: Spada, H., Stahl, G., Miyake, N., Law, N. (eds.) Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practices: CSCL11 Community Events Proceedings, vol. 2, Short Papers & Posters, pp. 910–911. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Hong Kong (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakki, A., Oubahssi, L., Cherkaoui, C., George, S.: Motivation and engagement in MOOCs: how to increase learning motivation by adapting pedagogical scenarios? In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, É. (eds.) EC-TEL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9307, pp. 556–559. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_58 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romero, M., Usart, M.: Serious games integration in an entrepreneurship massive online open course (MOOC). In: Ma, M., Oliveira, M.F., Petersen, S., Hauge, J.B. (eds.) SGDA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8101, pp. 212–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40790-1_21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Voulgari, I., Sampson, G.D.: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) and massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs): synergies and lessons to be learned. In: Sampson, G.D., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, M.J., Isaias, P. (eds.) Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning, 41–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37, 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verbraeck, A., Kurapati, S., Lukosch, H.: Serious games for improving situational awareness in container terminals. In: Zijm, H., Klumpp, M., Clausen, U., ten Hompel, M. (eds.) Logistics and supply chain innovation. LNL, pp. 413–431. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22288-2_25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perla, P.P., Markowitz, M., Nofi, A.A., Weuve, C., Loughran, J.: Gaming and shared situation awareness. DTIC Document (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lo, J.C., Meijer, S.A.: Gaming simulation design for individual and team situation awareness. In: Meijer, S.A., Smeds, R. (eds.) ISAGA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8264, pp. 121–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04954-0_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurapati, S., Lukosch, H., Verbraeck, A., Brazier, F.M.T.: Improving resilience in intermodal transport operations in seaports: a gaming approach. EURO J. Decis. Process. 3, 375–396 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurapati, S., Groen, D., Lukosch, H., Verbraeck, A.: Microgames in practice: a case study in container terminal operations. In: The Shift from Teaching to Learning: Individual, Collective and Organizational Learning Through Gaming Simulation, pp. 333–346 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muller, G.: Intermodal Freight Transportation. Eno Transportation Foundation, Washington, DC (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steenken, D., Voss, S., Stahlbock, R.: Container terminal operation and operations research-a classification and literature review. OR Spectr. 26, 3–49 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brinkmann, B.: Operations systems of container terminals: a compendious overview. In: Bose, J.W. (ed.) Handbook of Terminal Planning. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol. 49, pp. 25–39. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bose, J.: General considerations on container terminal planning. In: Bose, J. (ed.) Handbook of Terminal Planning. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol. 49, pp. 3–22. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Behdani, B.: Handling disruptions in supply chains: an integrated framework and an agent-based model. Delft University of Technology (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harrington, L.H., Boyson, S., Corsi, T.: X-SCM: The New Science of X-Treme Supply Chain Management. Routledge, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurning, S., Cahoon, S.: Analysis of multi-mitigation scenarios on maritime disruptions. Marit. Policy Manag. 38, 251–268 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harteveld, C.: Triadic Game Design: Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klemke, R., Kurapati, S., Lukosch, H., Specht, M.: Transferring an Educational Board Game to a Multi-user Mobile Learning Game to Increase Shared Situational Awareness. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9192, pp. 583–594. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klemke, R., Kurapati, S., Lukosch, H., Specht, M.: Lessons learned from creating a mobile version of an educational board game to increase situational awareness. In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, É. (eds.) EC-TEL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9307, pp. 183–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_14 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Freire, M., del Blanco, Á., Fernández-Manjón, B.: Serious games as edX MOOC activities. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 867–871 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heide Lukosch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shalini Kurapati
    • 1
  • Geertje Bekebrede
    • 1
  • Simon Tiemersma
    • 2
  • Daan Groen
    • 3
  • Linda van Veen
    • 3
  • Alexander Verbraeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Gamelab TU Delft Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.InThere, The HagueThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations